Home Menu

Site Navigation


View Single Post
Old 08-05-2019, 08:23 AM
kcdehart's Avatar
kcdehart kcdehart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 770
Real Name: Kevin
kcdehart is a jewel in the rough kcdehart is a jewel in the rough kcdehart is a jewel in the rough kcdehart is a jewel in the rough
kcdehart kcdehart is offline
Member
kcdehart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 770
Real Name: Kevin
kcdehart is a jewel in the rough kcdehart is a jewel in the rough kcdehart is a jewel in the rough kcdehart is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAST4R View Post
This is old, but for the record, it is wrong. Many SL tires in 4R sizes have maximum pressure of 51 psi and the remaining ones are 44 and not 36. Load ratings between P and C are often identical after adjusting for LT application (which is a discussion in itself, since the 4R is not a pickup).

I have not seen one ounce of evidence that a C tire is necessarily stronger for offroading than a B tire. Of course, if the tire does have a 3-ply sidewall (like many LTCs in 255 75 17) then the C will be stronger.



It is the common perception that E-load tires have stronger sidewalls for offroading because they have stronger construction so as to hold 80 psi and thus higher loads.

But in practice, unless the E load has a 3-ply sidewall, the advantage is likely way smaller offroad than it is when hauling, which is the design parameter.

I could definitely use a tough tire offroad yet I am running SL which is better at everything other than sidewall strength. The trick is to run the SL at or near street pressures. By contrast, the E must be aired down both for traction (terrain compliance) and comfort. On road the only possible advantage of D or E is added cornering stability at proper pressures. The rest is a laundry list of shortcomings.
On Grabbers, at least, the sidewalls are rated at 10-ply. I believe it's a '3-ply rated at 10-ply' (not sure how that's actually measured) but like I said, it's capable of handling more abuse than I can throw at them with something the weight of the 4Runner. The hit in gas mileage was 1 mpg. Oh well. I didn't buy this thing for gas mileage.

I would much rather run an aired down (or even aired up, I've offroaded mine at 40psi and they're bumpy but still grip fine for light offroad) E-load and not worry about sidewall punctures than run an SL and not have to worry about airing down.

Also, that sidewall stability on-road is amazing. I've been in trucks with C-load Grabbers and they handle like complete garbage compared to mine with the E's. It's night and day. Otherwise though, I didn't buy them to be good on-road. I bought them to be good offroad. If your truck sees 90% pavement, yeah, there's 0 reason to get E-load tires. Otherwise, I see no reason not to.
__________________

'04 4Runner - Build Thread | '05 CBR 600RR & 1000RR - The slow vehicles ;)
kcdehart is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
***This site is an unofficial Toyota site, and is not officially endorsed, supported, authorized by or affiliated with Toyota. All company, product, or service names references in this web site are used for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Toyota name, marks, designs and logos, as well as Toyota model names, are registered trademarks of Toyota Motor Corporation***Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
 
Copyright © 2020