Home Menu

Site Navigation


View Single Post
Old 08-22-2022, 05:49 PM
Jetboy's Avatar
Jetboy Jetboy is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,020
Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute
Jetboy Jetboy is offline
Elite Member
Jetboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Utah
Posts: 5,020
Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute Jetboy has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by honda250xtitan View Post
that shock tower hoop is suspicious as hell lol. all that work to run a 10"???stroke shock and stock width control arms. silly toyota.


stock bumps, no double shear UCA mounts, stock spindle. lol
To run in stock class there's a lot of limits on suspension mods. Basically you must use all OEM suspension and drive train other than springs and shocks. So there wasn't a choice in using longer arms. They have to be OEM parts.

I don't think there's any reason to have double shear UCA mounts with OEM rubber bushings. The rubber bushings provide a lot of cushioning. That's why IMO they really are better than poly or rigid bushings for most uses.

It performed pretty well for what it is. Had a decent lead in the class until the rollover. Then they lost the front drive. I think due to an ECU issue related to rolling, but I've yet to read anything definitive on what the issue was. I don't think it was physical damage. But still ended second in class. It actually did better than any of the half dozen Ford raptor runs. But that's not really unusual. A stock taco also beat the raptor head to head in the same mint 400 a few years ago.

Some of the fab work looks questionable to me. But I don't know what the build schedule was. Might have done it in two weeks? There's a lot more out there to read about the raptor builds. They are really invasive - usually they cut the cab in half on those and build the cage and then rebuild the cab and repaint to look OEM. On this one I think they just built what they could without major chopping. Probably on a much smaller budget.



What we need is more oems racing. I'd love to see a stock class with a TRX, raptor, Tundra, and stock mini full of Tacoma, rangers, Colorado, 4Rs, wranglers, and broncos. All running the same year head to head in stock classes.
Jetboy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
***This site is an unofficial Toyota site, and is not officially endorsed, supported, authorized by or affiliated with Toyota. All company, product, or service names references in this web site are used for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Toyota name, marks, designs and logos, as well as Toyota model names, are registered trademarks of Toyota Motor Corporation***Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
 
Copyright © 2020