Quote:
Originally Posted by scfw0x0f
Let's assume we're trying to construct a general model for a variety of tasks. While driving trails in Indiana (for example) may generally be lower risk than attempting high-risk technical trails in Utah or Colorado, is the risk profile for a specific location on a 4Runner substantially different relative to the risks to other systems? That is, for example, is the fuel tank always at the same level of relative risk vs. the rear diff, or are there operational modes that shift the relative risk among the various systems?
|
Uhhh…. It matters because if you’re trying to save weight, stock armor is more adequate in many situations too. Lots of trails people consider off roading or overlanding are nothing more than overgrown fire roads that don’t really need armor at all. Context matters.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
