Quote:
Originally Posted by Gone4Wheeling
They are on my list too. Per specs they would be 11" wide on 8" rim per BFG specs which is wider than the OEM 20" set up.
As I mentioned, I was thinking the narrower 9" would have a couple advantages. I guess the wider 265/70/R17 being an OE size would not cause rubbing issues on a 15mm offset rim, is that correct?
Your point about using a common size if a very valid one to consider.
|
There should not be rubbing at the stock size. However if there is, it would be minimal with the mud flaps or fender liner due to the extra tread depth and squared off shoulders of an AT Easily resolved using a heat gun (look up fender liner mod). I don’t think its an issue at +15 offset as my rubbing was extremely minimal and only at full lock in reverse at +4 offset.
I think you’re overthinking this. E load might even be overkill even here in Colorado for your specific purposes. I ran SL Wildpeaks all over 4-5 rated trails trails here without ever worrying about it. I did recently switch up to C load as I’m doing more rock crawling.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
