View Poll Results: What kind of rear bumper do you want?
|
I want a bumper that will retain the stock tire carrier
|
|
9 |
10.98% |
I want a bumper that will retain the stock tire carrier
|
|
9 |
10.98% |
|
I want a high clearance bumper and don't care about the stock carrier
|
|
23 |
28.05% |
I want a high clearance bumper and don't care about the stock carrier
|
|
23 |
28.05% |
|
I want a bumper with tire carrier from the start
|
|
33 |
40.24% |
I want a bumper with tire carrier from the start
|
|
33 |
40.24% |
|
I want a one that I can add a tire carrier to later on even if it requires fabbing after the fact.
|
|
28 |
34.15% |
I want a one that I can add a tire carrier to later on even if it requires fabbing after the fact.
|
|
28 |
34.15% |
|
12-12-2011, 06:18 PM
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagobah
I want a bumper that doesn't toss affordability out the window when you add a tire carrier...
(the tire carrier is the main reason why I want a rear bumper)
|
Its extremely hard to do that. The easiest response to this is that "you can't have your cake and eat it too".
Let me explain. A tire carrier requires the entire setup to be built to the point of overkill. I, as a company, will over build everything since its my name on it, and my liability at risk. So, I would only use the strongest setup for the steel, spindle, and latching mechanism. Unfortunately, cheap and quality don't mix. And, therefore, a bumper/carrier like this would be priced based on quality.
I don't want to speculate on pricing, but I would expect it to be priced accordingly with the other setups like this on the market.
One more thing of note just so everyone is aware of this ahead of time. I refuse to build a carrier with fuel cans on it. So, there is absolutely no way I would ever build a carrier to house fuel cans. I don't want the liability of someone strapping a BOMB to the back of their car. If you get rear ended, it can literally explode. I also do not want the extra 45lbs of weight per fuel can hanging off of the spindle. Its not safe, and I will never put my name on it.
If you need more than 18 gallons of fuel, then you need to look into an auxiliary fuel tank. In fact, an auxiliary fuel tank can be installed in place of the stock tire carrier under the back.
Last edited by AddictedOffroad; 12-12-2011 at 09:38 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 06:20 PM
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IdahoAngler
If I recall, didn't your original rear bumper have dual rounded tubes vs. this new design with a rounded tube on top and a square (plate-like) bottom? Why the change in design?
I think I prefer the dual-tube look, but that's just me.
|
The original bumper used 2x4 square tubing through the center section.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 06:27 PM
|
#18
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 126
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AddictedOffroad
The original bumper used 2x4 square tubing through the center section.
|
Why the change in design?
__________________
1997 SR5 4WD; 5-SPD; ToyTec Ultimate Lift; Toyo MT 255/85/R16; 1.5" spacers; Rocky Road SuperSliders (modified); Full Length BajaRack; Upgraded 99+ Headlights; Plasti-dipped Grill
2013 FJ Cruiser TT; 6-SPD; Radflo 3" Suspension; ToyOutfitter front tube bumper; Expedition One rear tire-carrier bumper
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 06:31 PM
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IdahoAngler
Why the change in design?
|
Mainly because it appeals to the masses more, and it will help with the design. Don't worry, the aesthetics of the bumper itself will still look very similar. But, the function is what we are trying to improve.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 06:40 PM
|
#20
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 126
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AddictedOffroad
Mainly because it appeals to the masses more, and it will help with the design. Don't worry, the aesthetics of the bumper itself will still look very similar. But, the function is what we are trying to improve.
|
I like the new one very much...kind of splits the difference between plate/tube.
__________________
1997 SR5 4WD; 5-SPD; ToyTec Ultimate Lift; Toyo MT 255/85/R16; 1.5" spacers; Rocky Road SuperSliders (modified); Full Length BajaRack; Upgraded 99+ Headlights; Plasti-dipped Grill
2013 FJ Cruiser TT; 6-SPD; Radflo 3" Suspension; ToyOutfitter front tube bumper; Expedition One rear tire-carrier bumper
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 06:50 PM
|
#21
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 5th Gen San Diegan
Age: 41
Posts: 985
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 5th Gen San Diegan
Age: 41
Posts: 985
|
Well, I think most people who need a steel/aftermarket bumper is because they want higher clearence and would like the protection over the tin-foil stock one.
Saying that, you've probably got a lift and running at least a 285 tire, which doesn't fit in the stock location anyways. It also takes up a lot of space up on a roofrack and is not fun to get up and down.
That would conclude that a bumper with a tire carrier, and not caring about the stock location would be important to most people, but of course... Thats my own opinion on the matter.
Another thing that I would really like to see is that the tire carrier section being removable, so that you can put on the carrier when going on trips, but take it off with commuting to retain better vision, and ease of everyday use of the back hatch.
I really like the design as well. Id rather have a light weight bumper with high clearance since the rear is already on the heavy side. I really like you are asking the community for insight.
__________________
2005 Limited V8 4x4 4Runner
2005 SR5 V8 4Runner
1997 40th Anniversary FZJ80
2001 Ford F350 w/ FWC Hawk
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 06:57 PM
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baja Runner
Well, I think most people who need a steel/aftermarket bumper is because they want higher clearence and would like the protection over the tin-foil stock one.
Saying that, you've probably got a lift and running at least a 285 tire, which doesn't fit in the stock location anyways. It also takes up a lot of space up on a roofrack and is not fun to get up and down.
That would conclude that a bumper with a tire carrier, and not caring about the stock location would be important to most people, but of course... Thats my own opinion on the matter.
Another thing that I would really like to see is that the tire carrier section being removable, so that you can put on the carrier when going on trips, but take it off with commuting to retain better vision, and ease of everyday use of the back hatch.
I really like the design as well. Id rather have a light weight bumper with high clearance since the rear is already on the heavy side. I really like you are asking the community for insight.
|
This is where we are going. At this point, it appears that we will offer the bumper by itself with the option of adding a carrier later, and the bumper with a carrier. I can add a provision for a highlift. Oh, and yes, the swing out could be removed if needed for commuting.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 07:05 PM
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nelson, BC
Posts: 2,552
Real Name: Addison
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nelson, BC
Posts: 2,552
Real Name: Addison
|
I still think having a gas can holder on the swing-out is beneficial for SUV's. Who wants to keep spare gas inside the rig? (assuming you dont have an aux. tank) I understand your point for not including them, and it's completely reasonable... but an aux. fuel tank just isn't within the scope of a lot of peoples rigs who serve both DD and trail functionality. I guess I can stop talking and just put a jerry can on the roof too... lol
The bumper looks awesome! I've always liked this design.
- Hi-Lift mount would be a good provision.
- A stove table on the inside of the swing-out would seal the deal for me, as my truck sees tons of camping use. The stove table on some "competitors" bumpers is pretty appealing IMO. Plus, if your worried about overloading the spindle etc, this option won't weigh very much! Im curious on the weight of this bumper....
Oh, and I voted #4 because with rear bumpers and tire carriers being so expensive, it may be beneficial for some to split-up the "investment".
edit: I took the time to read through the whole thread... haha
Last edited by rickashay; 12-12-2011 at 08:14 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 07:15 PM
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis area
Age: 56
Posts: 1,872
Real Name: Throws like a girl
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis area
Age: 56
Posts: 1,872
Real Name: Throws like a girl
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AddictedOffroad
I don't want the liability of someone strapping a BOMB to the back of their car. If you get rear ended, it can literally explode.
|
This happened to my neighbors when we were kids. Their family had a can strapped to the back of their motorhome and someone rear ended them. They lost 2 of the kids and various other bits and pieces. After that the mom just sat on the porch staring at us with the eye she had left, the dad nearby looking lost. Ick.
I like 3. Actually the original version seems a little leaner and I like that better but there's no way I'm going to get a tire on the roof rack so it's either underneath or on back. Don't like either option that much but on back makes more sense than underneath given why for the bumper anyway. I'd just strap it inside but that's where all the doing stuff goes.
Being perpetually kid going to college broke , it'll be a loooonnnngggg while before I get to do anything. At all. Ever.
__________________
'96 4Runner SR5, assorted baubles and doodads. Stuff happened to it. Stuff is still happening to it. Okay, now the stuff is just getting ridiculous.
'99 4Runner SR5 Highlander, manual w/locker. Stuff is starting to happen to this one too...too much stuff! Too much stuff!!
http://www.yotatech.com/f200/habaner...thread-201751/
Quote:
Originally Posted by PWD4R
I know this is a weird ass question but do you shave your legs or something?
|
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 07:35 PM
|
#25
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 205
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 205
|
If I could, I'd vote #2 AND #3.
IMHO: The main reason for an aftermarket bumper is to provide clearance. The majority of the people that need the clearance are running larger tires that do not fit in the stock location. The interior and the roof of our 4Runners are not the smartest places to put an oversized tire, for obvious reasons.
The only way you're going to create a well selling bumper is to make it practical for everyone. And Affordable.
edit: Ok, so I basically said the same thing as Baja Runner, I'm just slower.
__________________
A Giant work in progress.
Last edited by Brignola85; 12-12-2011 at 07:38 PM.
Reason: double post?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 08:15 PM
|
#26
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Age: 37
Posts: 5,150
Real Name: Waldo
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Age: 37
Posts: 5,150
Real Name: Waldo
|
I'll have to agree with Baja and Brignola (even though he said the same thing ) I'm not carrying a spare, which sucks, and it's because 1) I'm not putting it on top 2) I don't have room for it in the back and 3) A 285 just wont fit under the truck, plus it's a major rear clearance factor.
The main reason for me with getting an aftermarket bumper is having a tire carrier. I would still benefit from the high clearance and stronger steel cus trust me, my rear bumper is in no shape or form pristine or even close to it.
I vote #4, mainly because I just can't afford to throw about a grand or more at a bumper w/ a carrier at once. I would love to but it's not an option for me right now.
What I think you should do is offer an add-on tire carrier package for a specific bumper and make the bumper versatile enough that it would still look ok without it. Put together a package that contains everything you would need to install the tire carrier onto the bumper with instructions. I have more than enough connections with friends that will allow me to get this done whether it's grinding, welding, cutting, etc etc.. You can probably assume that about 75% of the people on here have the same connections if not already obtain the skills. I honestly don't see why companies don't already do this..
__________________
'99 Toyota 4Runner LTD - Dual Locked | Geared | Mid-Travel | 35s | Armored
Last edited by JWaldz; 12-12-2011 at 08:18 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-12-2011, 10:53 PM
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,521
Real Name: Alex
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,521
Real Name: Alex
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AddictedOffroad
|
If that were a woman, I would make sweet, sweet, sensual love to it. For a minute, maybe two, if she were lucky.
__________________
2006 Lexus GX 470 Sport- RR Diff Lock, Metal Tech Sliders, RCI Aluminum Skids, Front Runner Slimline II Rack, SCS F5s, 255/80R17 ST Maxx , OME BP-51s, Dirt King UCAs, Metal Tech RR Lower Links
2016 Lexus IS300 F Sport- F-Sport Air Filter RR Racing tuner
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-13-2011, 09:45 AM
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Windsor, CO
Age: 48
Posts: 1,795
|
Okay, so based on the poll its pretty much an overwhelming response in favor of ditching the stock carrier, so we will be doing that. (Sorry to those who wanted to keep it)
We have decided to offer a bumper that will allow attachment of a tire carrier after the fact so it can be purchased later. This will require fabrication on the end user's part later on. We will also off the carrier completely fabbed and ready to bolt on after paint.
We will send out some pieces for press bend. I will try to get pricing info up as soon as we get some quotes back what these pieces are going to run us. Not to mention I need to get some quotes on the spindles and latches.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-13-2011, 12:44 PM
|
#29
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 190
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 190
|
Good news, I'm glad it went this way
__________________
97 SR5 5 speed, 285/75/16 Duratracs, adjustable 3" Toytec coilovers, 8 wrap LC coils and 5125 Bilstein shocks, Addicted Offroad bumper, M8000 winch, Addicted Offroad rock sliders
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-13-2011, 09:21 PM
|
#30
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Age: 37
Posts: 5,150
Real Name: Waldo
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Age: 37
Posts: 5,150
Real Name: Waldo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AddictedOffroad
We have decided to offer a bumper that will allow attachment of a tire carrier after the fact so it can be purchased later. This will require fabrication on the end user's part later on. We will also off the carrier completely fabbed and ready to bolt on after paint.
|
Glad yall decided on this.
I wish more companies would do it.. Hopefully it catches on. I really think you guys will benefit from it more.
It's also awesome to see the sponsors get on here and ask what we'd like to see. You guys get a golden star sticker next to your name.. Trust me, you don't want a thundercloud sticker
Waldz
__________________
'99 Toyota 4Runner LTD - Dual Locked | Geared | Mid-Travel | 35s | Armored
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|