01-16-2017, 03:10 PM
|
#1
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 44
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 44
|
Horse Power concepts.
The new standard being Hp per liter as a measurement of Volumetric efficiency.
I figured I would pull this over to a mew thread instead of tacking it onto an old one. These are new standards about observable power liter correlations not some definable algebraic equation.
Introducing the 5 stroke Gas engine.
https://www.buzzspeed.com/join-five-...e-from-the-uk/
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-16-2017, 04:32 PM
|
#3
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Great PNW
Posts: 2,016
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Great PNW
Posts: 2,016
|
Horse Power concepts.
Damn. That's incredible. Mind blown is right! That FreeValve technology is so simple, yet so innovative
Last edited by Tyler James Inc; 01-16-2017 at 06:01 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-16-2017, 04:51 PM
|
#4
|
 |
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CO
Posts: 6,022
|
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CO
Posts: 6,022
|
Ohh WOW, I cant believe it!
__________________
1996 Toyota 4runner Limited - 4" Lift, 33's, AOR Bumper w/winch
1990 Eagle Talon Tsi- E316G @ 32psi E85 Tuned, 272 cams, ECMlink v3.0, 405whp - Gave back to Brother
2012 Toyota Tacoma DCSB - Stock on 32's- Wifes
2004 Cadillac CTS-V - 5.7L LS6 v8, 6-speed 400hp/400tq - My new DD
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/3rd-ge...read-pics.html
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-16-2017, 07:57 PM
|
#5
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 15
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
Well, they do admit that their gas-burning five-stroke engines will not match the efficiency and low emission levels of VW’s diesel engines; those cannot be beat!
|
Im going to go out on a limb and assume this isnt the most recent of articles
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-16-2017, 09:37 PM
|
#6
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 180
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by utekineir
Im going to go out on a limb and assume this isnt the most recent of articles
|
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-16-2017, 11:57 PM
|
#7
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 44
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 44
|
Could anyone imagine a 5.7l with freevalve running 240 hp per liter VE? Just the 165 hp per liter non turbo is freaking ridiculous at 940hp. 1368hp from a 5.7 shit is changing. Now what do you think of the new Hellcat?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-17-2017, 03:34 AM
|
#8
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 2,301
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jt2El46
Could anyone imagine a 5.7l with freevalve running 240 hp per liter VE? Just the 165 hp per liter non turbo is freaking ridiculous at 940hp. 1368hp from a 5.7 shit is changing. Now what do you think of the new Hellcat?
|
I'll believe it when I can buy it/see it.
__________________
1989 FJ62 5.3 Chevy, FZJ80 Axles, 4.88's with ARB.
2000 2wd runner, 4 cylinders, yes it IS slow.
1999 4WD SR5 Desert Dune 3.4 351K and counting.
2000 4WD sport 3.4 Elocker <--My son's but I still end up paying.
2001 2WD SR5 3.4 <-- My daughter's...see preceding line.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-17-2017, 04:42 AM
|
#9
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern California
Age: 50
Posts: 2,160
Real Name: Woody
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern California
Age: 50
Posts: 2,160
Real Name: Woody
|
Oh wow yay...just what I've been dreaming of — yet another new "thing" to make my 20 year old engine seem even more archaic, punny and inefficient.
__________________
"Variety is for your mind, not your body " —OS
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-17-2017, 09:04 AM
|
#10
|
 |
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,146
Real Name: C8H18 Mike
|
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,146
Real Name: C8H18 Mike
|
__________________
.
1999 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Sport 4WD, V6 5-Speed e-Locker-> 4WD 4runner Journal Thread
1999 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Un-Sported 2WD, V6 Auto -> 2WD 4runner Journal Thread
1959 Chevy 3100 1/2 Ton Pickup EVERYTHING done 'cept paint and body
.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-17-2017, 09:23 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
Huge power is so 1995. These days you can probably buy a 12 second minivan from the factory and then an electric car that makes it look slow. What's the point?
It's over guys. Time to come up with a new yardstick. I think the cool "hot rods" of the next 20 years will either be radically custom, or perhaps various examples of electric retrofit on something classic. Bragging rights will come with range, rather than power output.
__________________
1997 4Runner SR5 4X4 5MT elocker.
2005 Echo Hatchback 5MT.
1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan.
1991 Volvo 740 wagon.
2000 Mercedes E55 sedan.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-17-2017, 10:01 AM
|
#12
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Burlington, Vt
Posts: 417
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Burlington, Vt
Posts: 417
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jt2El46
|
I want one!
__________________
Black 99 highlander. toytec ultimate lift with bilstiens, and diff drop. 255 85 BFG KM2's, and tundra 231mm brake mod to stop them. ISR, and deckplate mod, rear diff breather. Front ARB locker and compressor. Scan gauge 2. Yakima mega warrior. Savage rear with swing out. AND NOW....SC'D!!
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-17-2017, 10:38 AM
|
#13
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 2,301
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
Huge power is so 1995. These days you can probably buy a 12 second minivan from the factory and then an electric car that makes it look slow. What's the point?
It's over guys. Time to come up with a new yardstick. I think the cool "hot rods" of the next 20 years will either be radically custom, or perhaps various examples of electric retrofit on something classic. Bragging rights will come with range, rather than power output.
|
In the early 80's they tried to convince us power was passe, mileage was the new standard.
Adrenalin is hard to beat, and shutting down cylinders is so 80's Cadillac.
Of course I don't want a 12 second minivan either, but power won't be out of fashion in my lifetime.
__________________
1989 FJ62 5.3 Chevy, FZJ80 Axles, 4.88's with ARB.
2000 2wd runner, 4 cylinders, yes it IS slow.
1999 4WD SR5 Desert Dune 3.4 351K and counting.
2000 4WD sport 3.4 Elocker <--My son's but I still end up paying.
2001 2WD SR5 3.4 <-- My daughter's...see preceding line.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-17-2017, 10:52 AM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBallEngineer
Of course I don't want a 12 second minivan either, but power won't be out of fashion in my lifetime.
|
Not saying power won't be out of fashion, but we've long passed the point of diminishing returns. My newest car is 16 years old and I can't run wide open for more than a few seconds at a time. I've never had it to top speed. So what does double the power get me?
Here's one from 10 years ago that already could do it in mid 13s
__________________
1997 4Runner SR5 4X4 5MT elocker.
2005 Echo Hatchback 5MT.
1990 Volvo 740 Turbo sedan.
1991 Volvo 740 wagon.
2000 Mercedes E55 sedan.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
01-18-2017, 02:14 AM
|
#15
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 44
|
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 44
|
Long story short the Head math in our engines have been pushing the so called American engines to catch up. From the 3.4 on there is much more power to be had if you understand the math and without loosing reliability.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|