10-29-2019, 03:05 PM
|
#1
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
Target Air Fuel Ratio for ScanGauge in my 97.
Target AF Ratio for B1S1 for my 97 with the 3.4. It works.
TXD 686AF10106
RXF 044145060000
RXD 2808
MTH 05B900800000
Name A/F
Edit: I just corrected the TXD and RXF to show the 06 memory location instead of the 05.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by 19963.4lsr5; 09-17-2020 at 08:07 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-02-2019, 10:26 PM
|
#2
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
Just so you all know. Running an engine temp colder than 191f will not achieve the 14.7:1 air fuel ratio. It has to be 191 or higher.
I blocked 6” of my rad and I am still running 186-191 this time of year in PA. I’d like to get it to 195. I wonder if flipping the thermostat the wrong way will do it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-02-2019, 10:38 PM
|
#3
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19963.4lsr5
Just so you all know. Running an engine temp colder than 191f will not achieve the 14.7:1 air fuel ratio. It has to be 191 or higher.
I blocked 6” of my rad and I am still running 186-191 this time of year in PA. I’d like to get it to 195. I wonder if flipping the thermostat the wrong way will do it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Everything I've read has said that it's not very accurate to try and get afr readings off the stock O2 sensor. Not sure what you are meaning that you cant get 14.7 unless you are higher that 191 temp, I have an aftermarket afr gauge and welded bung in the exhaust and bounces around 14.7 ratio well under 191 temp. Am I missing something here? I run a super charger and with a cooler thermostat. Normal operating temps for me is 181. Are you basing your findings on your scan gauge readings?
__________________
97 Charged, lifted, armored, geared, locked SR5.
Last edited by Toy2play; 11-02-2019 at 10:55 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-02-2019, 10:45 PM
|
#4
|
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Western PA
Posts: 6,012
Real Name: Jon
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Western PA
Posts: 6,012
Real Name: Jon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19963.4lsr5
Just so you all know. Running an engine temp colder than 191f will not achieve the 14.7:1 air fuel ratio. It has to be 191 or higher.
I blocked 6” of my rad and I am still running 186-191 this time of year in PA. I’d like to get it to 195. I wonder if flipping the thermostat the wrong way will do it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
I would say you would gain a few degrees by putting the jiggler at 12 o'clock instead of 6. Good to know that 191 up required for 14.7: 1 ratio.
Your thermostat isn't stick open is it?
Sent from my SM-J337V using Tapatalk
__________________
7 3rd gens listed in the build thread (2 are parts mobiles)
Build Thread: https://www.toyota-4runner.org/3rd-g...os-builds.html
Brillo's Bucket Fluid Ex changer: https://www.toyota-4runner.org/3rd-g...ml#post3358086
Sparks Plugs Wire and Coil Information: https://www.toyota-4runner.org/3rd-g...on-5vz-fe.html
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-02-2019, 11:27 PM
|
#5
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy2play
Everything I've read has said that it's not very accurate to try and get afr readings off the stock O2 sensor. Not sure what you are meaning that you cant get 14.7 unless you are higher that 191 temp, I have an aftermarket afr gauge and welded bung in the exhaust and bounces around 14.7 ratio well under 191 temp. Am I missing something here? I run a super charger and with a cooler thermostat. Normal operating temps for me is 181. Are you basing your findings on your scan gauge readings?
|
It’s the target AF ratio not the actual.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-02-2019, 11:28 PM
|
#6
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brillo_76
I would say you would gain a few degrees by putting the jiggler at 12 o'clock instead of 6. Good to know that 191 up required for 14.7: 1 ratio.
Your thermostat isn't stick open is it?
Sent from my SM-J337V using Tapatalk
|
I get up to temp in around 2-3 miles when it’s in the low 30’s outside.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-02-2019, 11:42 PM
|
#7
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19963.4lsr5
It’s the target AF ratio not the actual.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
I still a bit confused by your post. I'm not sure the purpose of saying that you cant achieve 14.7:1 unless you are over 191 degrees. I know very little about afr, but have been forced to get a better understanding because of the supercharger. I'm just trying to grasp your statement since my afr gauge does not show that at all. Are you saying that your afr is not 14.7:1 ratio under 191 engine temp? If so, where are you getting this reading?
__________________
97 Charged, lifted, armored, geared, locked SR5.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-03-2019, 12:35 AM
|
#8
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
Target Air Fuel Ratio for ScanGauge in my 97.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy2play
I still a bit confused by your post. I'm not sure the purpose of saying that you cant achieve 14.7:1 unless you are over 191 degrees. I know very little about afr, but have been forced to get a better understanding because of the supercharger. I'm just trying to grasp your statement since my afr gauge does not show that at all. Are you saying that your afr is not 14.7:1 ratio under 191 engine temp? If so, where are you getting this reading?
|
I’m getting the reading from the above PID settings VIA my ScanGauge.
When the engine cold starts it’s target air fuel ratio is really rich. In the weather I’m having it starts out around 7 to 8. It slowly ramps up the target AFR as the engine warms up around 1 min into this the engine goes closed loop and starts using the front O2 sensor to achieve the target AFR. The warmer the engine the higher the target. It uses the O2 sensor and the LTFT and STFT to achieve the target AFR. When the engine hits 191f the target AFR is at 14.7. 188f engine temp is around 14.4 AFR as an example.
I don’t know your year buy my 97 would have the target AFR around 14.0 at 181. I can verify that in the morning by watching the engine temp and AFR target at the same time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by 19963.4lsr5; 11-03-2019 at 12:38 AM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-03-2019, 10:08 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Age: 25
Posts: 917
Real Name: Phoenix
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Age: 25
Posts: 917
Real Name: Phoenix
|
Prior to I beleive 1999 Toyota used narrowband o2 sensors in all the 4runners. These sensors don't understand afr they only read on a 0 to 1v scale that is either rich or lean. I have an AEM afr gauge installed in my truck and I hit 14.7 afr almost immediately after startup and it hovers there untill my tune takes over in boost. Not really understanding the purpose of having a "target afr" reading on the scangauge. Also attached a graph showing how narrowband o2s read
__________________
98 Limited - Solid Axle Swapped,Turboed,And On 37s - Build
Transgo Shit Kit Writeup - Click Here
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-03-2019, 11:03 AM
|
#11
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19963.4lsr5
I’m getting the reading from the above PID settings VIA my ScanGauge.
When the engine cold starts it’s target air fuel ratio is really rich. In the weather I’m having it starts out around 7 to 8. It slowly ramps up the target AFR as the engine warms up around 1 min into this the engine goes closed loop and starts using the front O2 sensor to achieve the target AFR. The warmer the engine the higher the target. It uses the O2 sensor and the LTFT and STFT to achieve the target AFR. When the engine hits 191f the target AFR is at 14.7. 188f engine temp is around 14.4 AFR as an example.
I don’t know your year buy my 97 would have the target AFR around 14.0 at 181. I can verify that in the morning by watching the engine temp and AFR target at the same time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
I appreciate the explanation. As per my afr gauge, mine also runs rich at first, but bounces around 14.7 fairly quick which is normal. I dont think you are getting an accurate reading with the scan gauge. Mine is also a 97. To make the engine run hotter so that you can achieve stoich seems a little extreme in this case. I dont believe you are getting an accurate reading. Even my afr bounces around quite a bit at idle/cruising within a seconds time it can change 2 or 3 times from 14.5 to 14.9 range with some 14.7, 14.8 in the mix. I have my doubts that what you are seeing is really 14.0 on the scan gauge at 181 degrees.
I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that you cant achieve stoich unless your temps are over 191. I mean no disrespect, imo I just think you are making assumptions on data that isnt true. I mean it wouldnt be hard for the ECU to regulate the afr for a 10 degree variance in engine temp. It does it at quite a bit lower temperatures just fine based off my wideband O2 sensor that I installed.
__________________
97 Charged, lifted, armored, geared, locked SR5.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-03-2019, 11:17 AM
|
#12
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Western US
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black798
Prior to I beleive 1999 Toyota used narrowband o2 sensors in all the 4runners. These sensors don't understand afr they only read on a 0 to 1v scale that is either rich or lean. I have an AEM afr gauge installed in my truck and I hit 14.7 afr almost immediately after startup and it hovers there untill my tune takes over in boost. Not really understanding the purpose of having a "target afr" reading on the scangauge. Also attached a graph showing how narrowband o2s read
|
I've even heard the 99+ runners that have a wideband O2 sensor are not reliable either. Everything I read came to the same conclusion, you need to install an aftermarket wideband sensor to get any accurate reading.
__________________
97 Charged, lifted, armored, geared, locked SR5.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-03-2019, 04:27 PM
|
#13
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy2play
I've even heard the 99+ runners that have a wideband O2 sensor are not reliable either. Everything I read came to the same conclusion, you need to install an aftermarket wideband sensor to get any accurate reading.
|
Yes, it is not ever to be used as an actual sensor. I was just curious if the parameter was available like on my Saturn, And if it behaved like it. That’s why I kept calling it target.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-03-2019, 06:19 PM
|
#14
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-03-2019, 06:55 PM
|
#15
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Stouchsburg PA
Posts: 5,304
|
Target Air Fuel Ratio for ScanGauge in my 97.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black798
Prior to I beleive 1999 Toyota used narrowband o2 sensors in all the 4runners. These sensors don't understand afr they only read on a 0 to 1v scale that is either rich or lean. I have an AEM afr gauge installed in my truck and I hit 14.7 afr almost immediately after startup and it hovers there untill my tune takes over in boost. Not really understanding the purpose of having a "target afr" reading on the scangauge. Also attached a graph showing how narrowband o2s read
|
I found it and put it on the ScanGauge to see if it behaved like my saturns. Stoch on a 0-1v Sensor is .50v. But it’s not near as accurate as a wide band and you need a a way to average the high and low swing to see what the AF Ratio is.
Tuning with a narrow band in the 90’s before wide band sensors and displays became available I shot for .4v to .5v in cruise mode and .92v at wide open throttle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by 19963.4lsr5; 11-03-2019 at 06:59 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|