09-18-2012, 04:46 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
Worse mileage after K&N?!??
I know what you're going to say, I like the sound so I have a heavier foot.
But I've honestly tried to drive very conservatively and still swear my mileage is 1-2 mpg worse.
Has anybody experienced this with an aftermarket intake?
Thanks for your input!
__________________
2005 Sport Edition V8, OME 885/895, Goodyear Duratrac 285/70R17's, Spidertrax spacers, K&N Intake, 15% over all glass - (Sold, but not forgotten)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-18-2012, 04:49 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Jersey
Age: 31
Posts: 2,480
Real Name: Mike
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Jersey
Age: 31
Posts: 2,480
Real Name: Mike
|
My guess is that you like the sound so you get on the throttle more, thus using more gas.
__________________
2006 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V8 4x4-Nautical Blue Metallic
1986 Toyota MR2 AW11 NA 5 Speed
NJshadow93's 2006 SR5 Build
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-18-2012, 04:53 PM
|
#3
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
Ha! I guess I should mention it's the complete intake, not the drop in filter.
And I read this thing would be loud... but holy crap, it's LOUD!
__________________
2005 Sport Edition V8, OME 885/895, Goodyear Duratrac 285/70R17's, Spidertrax spacers, K&N Intake, 15% over all glass - (Sold, but not forgotten)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-18-2012, 05:09 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Jersey
Age: 31
Posts: 2,480
Real Name: Mike
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Jersey
Age: 31
Posts: 2,480
Real Name: Mike
|
On a serious note, have your MAF sensor checked/cleaned. It may have been affected with the install.
__________________
2006 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V8 4x4-Nautical Blue Metallic
1986 Toyota MR2 AW11 NA 5 Speed
NJshadow93's 2006 SR5 Build
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-18-2012, 07:00 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,472
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,472
|
My guess would be... "More air = more fuel"
Your computer has adjusted the amount of fuel to keep the air:fuel ratio where it needs to be. I'm not sure how long it takes to dial itself in after a change, but I would think it could do it pretty quickly. Sometimes I wish that I had more air (living at 6500' elevation), but I do like my mileage up here better than closer to sea level!
__________________
Doozi's 2006 Sport Edition V6 4WD - Titanium Metallic - purchased 09-13-10
Dobinson's F: C59-302/GS59-220, R: C59-677V/GS59-575 / LR UCA's / Medic links / LT285/70R17 DuraTracs on Countersteer Type-X wheels / WeatherTech DigitalFits and Window Visors / Rear Diff Breather Mod / J.A.'s Fog Light Mod / Centric Premium rotors w/ Akebono Pro-Act Ultra Premium pads / LED interior lights / HIDs (4500k lows) / Man-A-Fre engine+tranny skids / RCI MetalWorks T-case skid / B.A.M.F LCA skids / CBI front/rear, Sherpa Equipment Company roof rack, WKOR sliders welded on, Panhard Correction Kit... Lovin' it!
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-18-2012, 07:14 PM
|
#6
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Central NJ
Age: 40
Posts: 437
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Central NJ
Age: 40
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doozi
My guess would be... "More air = more fuel"
Your computer has adjusted the amount of fuel to keep the air:fuel ratio where it needs to be. I'm not sure how long it takes to dial itself in after a change, but I would think it could do it pretty quickly. Sometimes I wish that I had more air (living at 6500' elevation), but I do like my mileage up here better than closer to sea level!
|
This will be my first winter with my truck. I'm afraid it's going to drink like a college freshman once the really cold air hits.
__________________
---------------------
2005 4R V8 4x4 Limited - LEDs, FX-Rs, Gibson exhaust, TRD Red Front/Rear shocks, OME front springs, Toyotec rear springs, BF Goodrich 275/70/17 K02s, 1.25" Spidertrax. Front/Rear Polyurethane sway bar bushings, Total Chaos lower control arm alignment tabs. 150k miles and counting
2005 Prius - DD/Grocery getter. 250k miles and counting.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-19-2012, 11:23 AM
|
#7
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJshadow93
On a serious note, have your MAF sensor checked/cleaned. It may have been affected with the install.
|
That's a good thought, I'll have to check it. Thanks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doozi
My guess would be... "More air = more fuel"
Your computer has adjusted the amount of fuel to keep the air:fuel ratio where it needs to be. I'm not sure how long it takes to dial itself in after a change, but I would think it could do it pretty quickly. Sometimes I wish that I had more air (living at 6500' elevation), but I do like my mileage up here better than closer to sea level!
|
I've never heard of better mileage because of altitude. I live at 6,000 ft myself and don't notice anything but power loss and 1/4 mile times a full second slower!
__________________
2005 Sport Edition V8, OME 885/895, Goodyear Duratrac 285/70R17's, Spidertrax spacers, K&N Intake, 15% over all glass - (Sold, but not forgotten)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-19-2012, 12:07 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,472
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,472
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnBkr
I've never heard of better mileage because of altitude. I live at 6,000 ft myself and don't notice anything but power loss and 1/4 mile times a full second slower!
|
The general rule of thumb is that you lose 3% power per 1000' in elevation gain. That reduction in power is the result of decreasing fuel quantities to match the decreasing oxygen content in the air. The stoichiometric ratio for gasoline is about 14.7:1... lower the available oxygen, the fuel has to be reduced to keep that ratio where it needs to be. That's why you have to re-jet carburetors for different elevations... you're controlling the amount of fuel delivered to the combustion chamber.
I definitely get better mileage at altitude, but definitely have less power... about 18% less power than at sea level. Most engine builders in our area use a "correction factor" of about 20%. I am also able to run 85-octane with no issues.
So that Pikes Peak hill climb car sitting at the starting line (~9,000 feet) with 1000hp can only produce 850hp at the finish line! But there's less air so, technically, you need less hp to push your vehicle through the air!! ;-)
__________________
Doozi's 2006 Sport Edition V6 4WD - Titanium Metallic - purchased 09-13-10
Dobinson's F: C59-302/GS59-220, R: C59-677V/GS59-575 / LR UCA's / Medic links / LT285/70R17 DuraTracs on Countersteer Type-X wheels / WeatherTech DigitalFits and Window Visors / Rear Diff Breather Mod / J.A.'s Fog Light Mod / Centric Premium rotors w/ Akebono Pro-Act Ultra Premium pads / LED interior lights / HIDs (4500k lows) / Man-A-Fre engine+tranny skids / RCI MetalWorks T-case skid / B.A.M.F LCA skids / CBI front/rear, Sherpa Equipment Company roof rack, WKOR sliders welded on, Panhard Correction Kit... Lovin' it!
Last edited by Doozi; 09-19-2012 at 12:13 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-19-2012, 03:19 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Age: 37
Posts: 295
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Age: 37
Posts: 295
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doozi
The general rule of thumb is that you lose 3% power per 1000' in elevation gain. That reduction in power is the result of decreasing fuel quantities to match the decreasing oxygen content in the air. The stoichiometric ratio for gasoline is about 14.7:1... lower the available oxygen, the fuel has to be reduced to keep that ratio where it needs to be. That's why you have to re-jet carburetors for different elevations... you're controlling the amount of fuel delivered to the combustion chamber.
I definitely get better mileage at altitude, but definitely have less power... about 18% less power than at sea level. Most engine builders in our area use a "correction factor" of about 20%. I am also able to run 85-octane with no issues.
So that Pikes Peak hill climb car sitting at the starting line (~9,000 feet) with 1000hp can only produce 850hp at the finish line! But there's less air so, technically, you need less hp to push your vehicle through the air!! ;-)
|
I can agree, lots of people forget how hard it is to move an object (car/truck) through (air) at high speed. Each parsec of air has a atmosphere of density when you move faster and faster the density or resistance increases (air is not weightless) so more power is needed, if the air is thinner and has less resistance (high elevation) then yeah it should be a little easier to navigate.... think of the raw power of a tornado...its only wind but it can push a car over, toss it through the air, or blow a house off its foundation... even at 60-85MPH i can feel a great amount of resistance from the air.
~INTERESTING STUFF!
__________________
__________________
2003 Sport Edition 4.7L V8 4WD, weather tech, carbon Filter delete, POR-15, Deeza Heavy Duty End-links, Prothane Bushings, AMSoil tranny, AMSoil diffs, Mobile 1 Synthetic, stay tuned more to come!
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-20-2012, 04:47 PM
|
#10
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jackson, TN
Age: 35
Posts: 7
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jackson, TN
Age: 35
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJshadow93
On a serious note, have your MAF sensor checked/cleaned. It may have been affected with the install.
|
Shadow is definitely on to something. I have had CAI's on all my cars and everytime the tube goes on, the MPGs go down. Dipping the MAF in rubbing alcohol definitely helps but as others have said, you are now sucking in way more air. Your engine recognizes this and is attempting to achieve the same air:fuel ratio that it is programmed to have with the stock intake. More air = more fuel.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-22-2012, 05:09 PM
|
#11
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 17
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 17
|
CAI can get you hydrolock though
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-22-2012, 05:52 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 715
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 715
|
I have a buddy with the CAI on a V6 and his is LOUD when he punches on it. I can only imagine how loud it is on a V8. He also doesn't get any better gas mileage and we're here in the sunny, flat-ass state of Florida. Although he does accelerate much faster than I do, but I've got a V8, so every ounce of fuel saved helps
__________________
'05 Black Limited V8 with XREAS / LED Interior & Exterior Swap / Custom LED Ground Lighting Strips Mounted Below Running Boards / HCF Delete / AFE Air Filter (Dry) / Optima YellowTop / DDM Tuning 35W 5000K HID Fogs / Weathertech Digital Floor Liners & Cargo Mat / 20" Enkei Wheels / Tacoma Skidplate / Built In Headrest DVD Monitors with Custom Covers / iPod Adapter / Pioneer AVIC-D3 HU with Navigation / PassPort 9500xi, Hardwired / 50% Tint / Custom White/Blue LED Gauges & HVAC /
Coming Soon: Lift, UCAs, 1.25" Spidertrax (have 'em, just waiting on install)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-27-2012, 10:23 AM
|
#13
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
Thanks for all the input. I think some of the oil from the filter made it's way to the MAF sensor.
Right after I installed the intake, I took the thing to the drag strip. (There was also a guy with an XJ on full width's and 40" tires there, so I wasn't the only douchebag with a lifted SUV running the 1/4 mile ) It was tons of fun but I think all the passes at WOT ended up causing my problems.
After cleaning the MAF, I gained about 2.5 mpg's back. I still think it's about 1/2mpg off what it was stock, but I can live with it.
__________________
2005 Sport Edition V8, OME 885/895, Goodyear Duratrac 285/70R17's, Spidertrax spacers, K&N Intake, 15% over all glass - (Sold, but not forgotten)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-27-2012, 10:35 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Jersey
Age: 31
Posts: 2,480
Real Name: Mike
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Jersey
Age: 31
Posts: 2,480
Real Name: Mike
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowbrdr033
I have a buddy with the CAI on a V6 and his is LOUD when he punches on it. I can only imagine how loud it is on a V8. He also doesn't get any better gas mileage and we're here in the sunny, flat-ass state of Florida. Although he does accelerate much faster than I do, but I've got a V8, so every ounce of fuel saved helps
|
You're friend with a V6 4Runner accelerates faster than your V8 4Runner? I find that hard to believe. Not with just a CAI anyway
__________________
2006 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V8 4x4-Nautical Blue Metallic
1986 Toyota MR2 AW11 NA 5 Speed
NJshadow93's 2006 SR5 Build
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
09-28-2012, 05:10 PM
|
#15
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morrison, Crawlerado
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJshadow93
You're friend with a V6 4Runner accelerates faster than your V8 4Runner? I find that hard to believe. Not with just a CAI anyway
|
I think he just means his friend has a heavier foot than he does.
At the dragstrip here, the V6 about a second slower in the 1/4 mile.
__________________
2005 Sport Edition V8, OME 885/895, Goodyear Duratrac 285/70R17's, Spidertrax spacers, K&N Intake, 15% over all glass - (Sold, but not forgotten)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|