04-27-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Long Island
Posts: 56
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Long Island
Posts: 56
|
4th Gen 2007 V8 vs. 5th Gen V6
I just test drove a new 4Runner Limited. I now understand why it was "limited." It's limited to only 6 cylinders, which is anemic compared to the 10 year older V8 sitting in my 4th gen. Toyota really messed up when it dropped the V8, even if it was trying to make its ugly GX more appealing and distinguished from the 4Runner line.
I thought the new V6's would be fine, but learned they're course, raspy and under powered. And my V8 isn't exactly a pony car either.
Toyota needs to give us a better engine choice!
__________________
2007 Toyota 4Runner Limited V8
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-27-2017, 03:32 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: [un]Free State - Frederick Co.
Posts: 686
Real Name: Steve
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: [un]Free State - Frederick Co.
Posts: 686
Real Name: Steve
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKTackDriver
I just test drove a new 4Runner Limited. I now understand why it was "limited." It's limited to only 6 cylinders, which is anemic compared to the 10 year older V8 sitting in my 4th gen. Toyota really messed up when it dropped the V8, even if it was trying to make its ugly GX more appealing and distinguished from the 4Runner line.
I thought the new V6's would be fine, but learned they're course, raspy and under powered. And my V8 isn't exactly a pony car either.
Toyota needs to give us a better engine choice!
|
Seems to be the ongoing gripe for 4th gen V8 owners that gen upped. I've never driven the V8, but I do know that the throttle programming in the 5th gens is anemic. You have to smash it to get going. But when you do that it's not too bad at all. Of course, it doesn't have the low end grunt still.
__________________
'15 Mag Gray LE -- TOTALED | '14 TE wheels - dipped black, Falken AT3W 285/70/17 | SPC Adjustable UCAs | Daystar 2.5/1.5 top spacer lift | RCI Fuel Tank Skid (Steel) | Shrockworks Step Sliders (trimmed LE Rocker Trim) | SR5 front end conversion
'08 BP Urban Runner -- 5100 fronts at .85 with Toytec 620# springs | SPC Adjustable UCAs | Plastics Guy Front Bump Stops | ICON VS 2.0 Rear with Toytec Superflex 2 inch springs | RCI Transition, Front and Transmission Steel Skid | LT275/65/18 Falken Wildpeak A/T3W | 1.25 inch wheels spacers
www.4runnerfamily.com | IG: Runn4est
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-27-2017, 03:51 PM
|
#3
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 985
Real Name: Matt
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 985
Real Name: Matt
|
The 5th gen is also heavier by at least 300lbs. The limited might be even heavier with all the useless stuff they add like power seats.
In Colorado it's even worse because the altitude decreases the available power. A bigger engine or forced induction helps make up for that.
__________________
2007 V8 Limited 4WD
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-27-2017, 04:18 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 3,528
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 3,528
|
preaching to the choir
Ill keep saving... Land Cruiser is starting to look better and better as I get older.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-27-2017, 05:26 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 499
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 499
|
I've been saving for a 5th gen for about 6 months and sold my v6 4th gen already. My buddy got a 5th gen before me, which gave me a chance to drive it a bit. After driving it and hearing him complain about it for the past few months I will be looking at, and possibly purchasing a 4th gen V8 with 80k on Saturday. The thought of spending that much money on something that in all honesty was not fun at all to drive is something I'm glad I didn't commit to. In addition to that the mpg he is getting is terrible for a 2017 v6 SUV.
__________________
2009 Trail Edition
2006 Sport Edition - SOLD
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-27-2017, 06:54 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 55
Real Name: Ethan
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 55
Real Name: Ethan
|
+1 to most of the comments here. It'll be a GX for me next time or a 200 series LC/LX if I can find one in my price range. I've gotten used to V8 power.....
__________________
08 SR5 V8, Bilstein 5100's set at 0.85", stock springs, KO2 265/70-17
09 Lexus RX350, stock (fiancees ride)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-27-2017, 09:33 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 143
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 143
|
In addition to all that, I think the 5th gens are really ugly, inside and out.
__________________
2008 V8 Limited 4WD
2006 V8 Limited 4WD-Totaled
2000 Pathfinder SE 4x4-Sold
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 02:29 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 3,528
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 3,528
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffMerr
In addition to that the mpg he is getting is terrible for a 2017 v6 SUV.
|
It really is fine...
Body on frame SUV... don't expect anything better from anyone else.
Why do you think body on frame is a dying breed with other manufactures moving to unibody. Sucks for off-road, great for MPG.
If fuel economy was the goal you should just look for something else. Personally I am pretty content with what it puts down. Still my gas saver over my 13 mpg Chevy Silverado lol.
My biggest concern is Toyota listening to stuff like this and eventually making the decision to move away from body on frame design. I very much appreciate that its built like a truck and not a crossover.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 09:50 AM
|
#9
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 42
Posts: 593
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 42
Posts: 593
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffMerr
I've been saving for a 5th gen for about 6 months and sold my v6 4th gen already. My buddy got a 5th gen before me, which gave me a chance to drive it a bit. After driving it and hearing him complain about it for the past few months I will be looking at, and possibly purchasing a 4th gen V8 with 80k on Saturday. The thought of spending that much money on something that in all honesty was not fun at all to drive is something I'm glad I didn't commit to. In addition to that the mpg he is getting is terrible for a 2017 v6 SUV.
|
I sold a 4th gen and purchased a 2016 last year. Needless to say I went back to a 4th gen. Everything felt like a downgrade to me in the 5th gen: power, handling, speed, MPG, etc.
__________________
Current: 2007 Limited
Previous: 2004 SR5, 2005 SE V8, 2007 SR5, 2016 SR5
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 11:09 AM
|
#10
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 630
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 630
|
I wonder what the 6th gen will bring? I haven't heard much about it to-date.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 11:18 AM
|
#11
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 499
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 499
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumbo
It really is fine...
Body on frame SUV... don't expect anything better from anyone else.
Why do you think body on frame is a dying breed with other manufactures moving to unibody. Sucks for off-road, great for MPG.
If fuel economy was the goal you should just look for something else. Personally I am pretty content with what it puts down. Still my gas saver over my 13 mpg Chevy Silverado lol.
|
Except for the Chevrolet Tahoe right? The 4Runner fuel economy is due to it being way underpowered. I'd be fine with the mpg if it was due to a v8 with more hp/torque, but it's not, and you can tell when you drive one.
__________________
2009 Trail Edition
2006 Sport Edition - SOLD
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 11:49 AM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,146
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,146
|
This has been beaten to death over in the 5th gen section and O.T. and G.D. sections. The reality is there is ample enough power in the 5th gen you just have to put your foot down on that skinny pedal. Sure the v8 has more low end torque, but comparatively the 5th gen is fine. I mean look at all the modified 5th gens out there fully armored up and oversized tires. Hell look at Lawndart's LT with massive tires, front and rear bumpers, full skids, loaded up rear cargo area, goose gear in the middle row, and a covered rack. It does just fine. The reality is its an SUV not a race car confused by what you guys are expecting with these things?
__________________
-2013 T4R SR5-MYSALSA-KO2's
-(SOLD)2006 T4R SR5. Nautical Blue Metallic. 255/70/17 General AT2. LED Interior Swap. Toytec Ultimate 3inch lift/Icon 2.0s Rear, SHROCKWORKS Front Bumper, OEM FJ wheels, WM Roofrack, slowly working it up. My Build thread HERE
-(SOLD)2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi. BMW Mica Blue paint job. Cobb stage 2 tuning. Other modifications.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 03:18 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In the Mountains
Posts: 133
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In the Mountains
Posts: 133
|
I've gotta agree with wadle5. I've got a 2004 v6 limited which I have owned since new. 13 years later with "assertive" mountain off roading, camping, long hauls through the Rocky Mountains, as well as my daily driver. I definitely use it as a utility vehicle. And I couldn't be happier with its performance. The engine is reliable and capable. It is awesome in deep snow winter driving etc etc etc. I call it my tank as it has got me through everything I have put it through.
Now I know peeps are comparing the 4th gen to 5 gens. But the complaint is often more about v6 vs v8. Unless one is doing some significant trailer hauling with which the lower end pull would be an advantage, I otherwise have not felt lacking with the v6. If one is doing a lot of trailer pulling they are likely into a truck for that anyway.
My attempt here is just to put out there my happiness with my v6 so if any are looking into one not to be dissuaded by what is often said around here about the disappointment about v8's being drop from the 4Runner line up.
I absolutely love my 4Runner and I drive it with as much pride now as when it was shiny new.
If someone comes across a 4th gen ( I can only speak for the 4th gen) (especially one in well kept shape) buy it. It does not disappoint for what it was designed for.
__________________
2004 V6 4Runner 4x4 Limited
Daystar lift 2.5/1.5, FJ Springs, RCI Full Skids, CBI Hidden front Hitch, ARB on-board Air, Rear Dif Breather Mod, Swaybar Links and Swaybar Bushing Upgrade, Compustar 2-way Autostart, Window Visors, Bug Deflector, Husky Mats, 265/70R17 General Grabber AT2/Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac, Black Oak LED's...
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 03:46 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,181
Real Name: Ron
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,181
Real Name: Ron
|
I so agree with the last two posters. So many people seem to think that if a vehicle doesn't accelerate briskly at 1500-2000 rpm it's gutless. That may be true for a Cummins diesel, but it's not true for any Toyota engine I've ever driven. You've gotta put your foot into it. Even the lowly 3.0 V6 in my '94 can do pretty well, but you simply have to get the rpms up above 3000 to get any performance. The 4.0 V6 and even the 4.7 V8 aren't that much different. The V8 has more low end torque, but if you're heading up I70 west of Denver and planning to hold 60 mph, you had better plan on rpms between 3 and 4 thousand on some of the grades. These engines only make real horsepower at higher rpms. The good news is that, because they are extremely well machined and balanced, they are very happy running that way for hours on end.
__________________
2006 Sport Edition, V8, 206K miles, 2.5/1.5" OME lift, SPC adjustable UCA's, 255/75/17 BFG KO2's load range C @ 40psi. Regeared diffs to 4.30, with TrueTrac in rear.
1994 SR5, V6, 5-spd, Aussie locker front, Aisin manual hubs, Truetrac rear, 33/10.50/15 BFG KO's, stock suspension, OBA (Viair 400C), Front Range Offroad twin stick, 225K miles. Dual 2.28 transfer cases, for a 90:1 crawl ratio.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
04-28-2017, 04:41 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 3,528
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 3,528
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffMerr
Except for the Chevrolet Tahoe right? The 4Runner fuel economy is due to it being way underpowered. I'd be fine with the mpg if it was due to a v8 with more hp/torque, but it's not, and you can tell when you drive one.
|
You have to drive it like a grandma to get those MPG numbers with a Tahoe.
We have a 5th Gen in the family so I am much familiar with how it drives. You just need to drive it like a rice rocket, get the food down and the revs up.
Or buy this and remap throttle position.
https://www.sprintboostersales.com/?...Fc7JKgodKlTVtQ
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|