10-17-2014, 12:17 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
Advertised approach and departure angles
I was looking at the spec sheet for approach and departure angles on the 5th gen. I've heard a few people say the trail matches the FJ and always thought how could that be.
The advertised specs for the 4runner are.
Approach
33 degrees - Trail
25 degrees – SR5 V6 (w/ appearance package), Limited
Departure
26 degrees - Trail
24 degrees – SR5 V6 (w/ appearance package), Limited
My understanding of these measurement is to draw a line on the ground across on the center of the tire contact patch, from that point on the ground run a line up to the lowest leading or trailing edge. to come up with the angle.
I get that the trail has a different front bumper and that would account for the improved approach, but on the rear the hitch is the lowest trailing point, so how does the trail end up with 2 degrees more departure. I'm pretty sure the frame and hitch are the same.
Same tire size, same ground clearance stock. In fact the trail has a .5" wider rim so should be a tad lower. Do they take angled (not straight on) approaches and departures into account in their advertised specs? There I can see the rear trail bumper making a difference.
Just curious how they come up with the advertised numbers.
I want to gain a bit more departure in the rear, but can't lose the utility of my hitch. Wondering what departure gains the CBI and others provide and what happens to the hitch position.
__________________
2011 SR5 4x4, Magnuson Supercharger, ICON ET coil overs, MT ICON LT rear, MT offset lower links, URD Y-Pipe, TC UCAs, Baja Rack, MT Sliders, RCI Aluminum skids, 4.56 gearing with ARB lockers front and rear. 305/70 Goodyear MTRs (34") on Konig Countersteer 17x8. Addicted front bumper, Custom undercover tube protection rear. LT font or SAS going on next.
1989 Hilux - 22RE, SAS, hydro assist, Full Exo cage, dual ultimate cases, RCVs, 529s w Detroit locker rear + ARB front, Diamond Axle, bead locks, 40s.
Last edited by wfo9; 10-17-2014 at 12:32 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-17-2014, 12:44 PM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
Approach and departure lines should be tangent to the tire OD to the lowest front or rear portion of bumper. The SR5 and LE go below the hitch a bit if I remember correctly. Yes, hitch is lowest part but you can drag a hitch with minimal damage. Width of rim does not matter. The easiest way to improve angles is to get larger diameter tires.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-17-2014, 01:04 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: KC
Posts: 3,225
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: KC
Posts: 3,225
|
It is due to plastic bumber skirt extendin below hitch on SR5 (see pic):
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-17-2014, 01:28 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by <<<<
It is due to plastic bumber skirt extendin below hitch on SR5 (see pic):
|
But the hitch is the most trailing edge and will drag the most. If you cheat and don't consider the the hitch itself, then the bumper cover difference (between older sr5 and trail) could make a 2* difference. Also on an angled departure the trail and 2014+ sr5 bumper give more clearance, but my understanding of the actual measurement is that only a straight on line is considered.
It's just a number and does not mean all that much in the real world, but it would be nice to know how modified rigs compare.
__________________
2011 SR5 4x4, Magnuson Supercharger, ICON ET coil overs, MT ICON LT rear, MT offset lower links, URD Y-Pipe, TC UCAs, Baja Rack, MT Sliders, RCI Aluminum skids, 4.56 gearing with ARB lockers front and rear. 305/70 Goodyear MTRs (34") on Konig Countersteer 17x8. Addicted front bumper, Custom undercover tube protection rear. LT font or SAS going on next.
1989 Hilux - 22RE, SAS, hydro assist, Full Exo cage, dual ultimate cases, RCVs, 529s w Detroit locker rear + ARB front, Diamond Axle, bead locks, 40s.
Last edited by wfo9; 10-17-2014 at 07:47 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-17-2014, 01:36 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1engineer
Approach and departure lines should be tangent to the tire OD to the lowest front or rear portion of bumper. The SR5 and LE go below the hitch a bit if I remember correctly. Yes, hitch is lowest part but you can drag a hitch with minimal damage. Width of rim does not matter. The easiest way to improve angles is to get larger diameter tires.
|
Tanget to the tire makes more sense. I should have realized that.
Width of rim would matter with the same tire size as it will decrease effective diameter. It is minimal, but could make a difference as would tire pressure....
__________________
2011 SR5 4x4, Magnuson Supercharger, ICON ET coil overs, MT ICON LT rear, MT offset lower links, URD Y-Pipe, TC UCAs, Baja Rack, MT Sliders, RCI Aluminum skids, 4.56 gearing with ARB lockers front and rear. 305/70 Goodyear MTRs (34") on Konig Countersteer 17x8. Addicted front bumper, Custom undercover tube protection rear. LT font or SAS going on next.
1989 Hilux - 22RE, SAS, hydro assist, Full Exo cage, dual ultimate cases, RCVs, 529s w Detroit locker rear + ARB front, Diamond Axle, bead locks, 40s.
Last edited by wfo9; 10-17-2014 at 01:41 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-17-2014, 03:05 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 1,433
Real Name: Dave
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 1,433
Real Name: Dave
|
Approach and Departure Angles
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1engineer
Approach and departure lines should be tangent to the tire OD to the lowest front or rear portion of bumper. The SR5 and LE go below the hitch a bit if I remember correctly. Yes, hitch is lowest part but you can drag a hitch with minimal damage. Width of rim does not matter. The easiest way to improve angles is to get larger diameter tires.
|
Yes, larger tires or a lift of the suspension or both. Another way is to raise the bumpers and shorten them. The 4Runners have long rear overhangs and bumpers. The FJ Cruiser is shorter at the rear end and has less cargo capacity inside as a result. The front bumper is low too. By changing the bumpers to steel, off-road aftermarket bumpers you can dramatically lift the bumper overhang, reduce or eliminate the front fenders dropping in front of the front wheels and slightly shorten the back bumper overhang. These bumpers dramatically alter the look of the car. They do provide recovery point shackles front and rear and a place to mount a winch, two important things a stock T4R lacks. ¿I am not sure what the aftermarket rear bumpers do with a trailer hitch?
Doesn't the Trail Edition have a 1" lift over the SR5 and the Limited? I thought I read that in the spec's. The rocker panels have less body trim and are thereby higher.
Another important measurement is the break-over angle, the angle of contact between wheels. Anyone care to comment on the body overhangs?
Dave
__________________
2015 T4R Trail Edition w/KDSS. Baja Rack flat utility rack, Baja Rack ladder, WeatherTech floor mats, Demello rock sliders. RCI skid plates, Falken AT3W LT285/70R17 tires, ICON Stage 7 tubular 2" extended travel lift, ICON Rebound 17x8.5" 0 offset alloy wheels, Baxter Performance remote oil filter adapter. Side exit exhaust, 2nd recovery hook on rear frame corner, DIY wheel well liners with 1/4" neoprene rubber.
Last edited by DesertCanyons; 10-17-2014 at 03:09 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-17-2014, 07:38 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertCanyons
Yes, larger tires or a lift of the suspension or both. Another way is to raise the bumpers and shorten them. The 4Runners have long rear overhangs and bumpers. The FJ Cruiser is shorter at the rear end and has less cargo capacity inside as a result. The front bumper is low too. By changing the bumpers to steel, off-road aftermarket bumpers you can dramatically lift the bumper overhang, reduce or eliminate the front fenders dropping in front of the front wheels and slightly shorten the back bumper overhang. These bumpers dramatically alter the look of the car. They do provide recovery point shackles front and rear and a place to mount a winch, two important things a stock T4R lacks. ¿I am not sure what the aftermarket rear bumpers do with a trailer hitch?
Doesn't the Trail Edition have a 1" lift over the SR5 and the Limited? I thought I read that in the spec's. The rocker panels have less body trim and are thereby higher.
Another important measurement is the break-over angle, the angle of contact between wheels. Anyone care to comment on the body overhangs?
Dave
|
The 2010-2013 sr5s and LEs had more trim hanging down compared to the trail, but I think they made the SR5s pretty much match the trail in 2014. Also the CA edition sr5 was the same as the trail from 2010 on.
Most people who run sliders on older sr5s and LEs remove the rocker panel or go to trail or shockworks trim, but the front and rear bumpers still have more plastic down low. It's not really a big deal since you probably want to eventually go with plate bumpers anyway at some point. I'm just curious how the angles measure out with the different bumpers, lifts, tires..... It seems like Toyota plays with the numbers a bit for the spec sheet and don't consider the hitch.
__________________
2011 SR5 4x4, Magnuson Supercharger, ICON ET coil overs, MT ICON LT rear, MT offset lower links, URD Y-Pipe, TC UCAs, Baja Rack, MT Sliders, RCI Aluminum skids, 4.56 gearing with ARB lockers front and rear. 305/70 Goodyear MTRs (34") on Konig Countersteer 17x8. Addicted front bumper, Custom undercover tube protection rear. LT font or SAS going on next.
1989 Hilux - 22RE, SAS, hydro assist, Full Exo cage, dual ultimate cases, RCVs, 529s w Detroit locker rear + ARB front, Diamond Axle, bead locks, 40s.
Last edited by wfo9; 10-17-2014 at 07:41 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-17-2014, 08:36 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 216
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wfo9
... It seems like Toyota plays with the numbers a bit for the spec sheet and don't consider the hitch.
|
They do put out suspect numbers in the spec sheets. They list the overall height of all models at 71.5", but that proves to be way low. They list the Limited wheel as 20 X 7.5, and that is wrong. And you might get the impression from the spec sheet that the Limited has no transfer case.
__________________
2014 LE BR, The Red Hare
1997 SR5, sold at 235K
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|