|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,991
|
Also, the 2wd models will get better MPG than any 4wd model because there is no front diff or transfer case to turn.
Even on sr5 and trails, the front axle on the drivers side is always spinning the differential planetary gears. This is slightly more rolling resistance than just wheel bearings. Also the transfer case itself introduces a slight efficiency loss as there is simply more mass for the motor to spin (even when in 2H).
With all else being equal (same tires. ride height...) the limited will get slightly worse MPG than a part time system in 2H. A 2wd model will clearly get the best mpg, but they are still not that great.
Like mentioned before. They are bricks and the motor is not the most efficient design in production. Direct injection and a better transmission would help a bunch, but it is still a heavy brick.
And just to clarify. The sr5 has a part time locked center/transfer case. The limited has a center diff that can be locked. Neither has a rear or front locker, but they both have atrac (a brake activated system that attempts to keep both wheels on an axle spinning at the same speed in crawl conditions)
__________________
2011 SR5 4x4, Magnuson Supercharger, ICON ET coil overs, MT ICON LT rear, MT offset lower links, URD Y-Pipe, TC UCAs, Baja Rack, MT Sliders, RCI Aluminum skids, 4.56 gearing with ARB lockers front and rear. 305/70 Goodyear MTRs (34") on Konig Countersteer 17x8. Addicted front bumper, Custom undercover tube protection rear. LT font or SAS going on next.
1989 Hilux - 22RE, SAS, hydro assist, Full Exo cage, dual ultimate cases, RCVs, 529s w Detroit locker rear + ARB front, Diamond Axle, bead locks, 40s.
Last edited by wfo9; 12-16-2014 at 07:42 PM.
|