12-30-2014, 01:07 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
Must decide: Toyota 4Runner vs Highlander
We need to buy a larger vehicle (my current daily commuter is a Mazda Miata) and my wife wants either a Highlander or a Mazda CX9. Personally, I think that the 4Runner is a more interesting alternative, although the lack of manual transmission is a major turn-off. My off-roading experience is zero, although I did take my Miata to the track a few times. I would be interested in having fun off-road, although I dont know where to begin
From a driver enthusiast's perspective, which one is superior? Is the 4Runner essentially an off-road truck?
Thank you for your help!
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 01:13 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Jose
Posts: 600
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Jose
Posts: 600
|
Buy a highlander.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 01:43 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Madison, CT
Posts: 1,037
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Madison, CT
Posts: 1,037
|
^^^^^ x2
__________________
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 01:45 AM
|
#4
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheers!
Buy a highlander.
|
Thanks. Are you saying that simply because the Highlander is more car-like than the 4Runner?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 01:46 AM
|
#5
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 30
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 30
|
Yep, if you're even considering a Highlander and a CX-9, then you'll probably be happier with the Highlander.
__________________
2013 Magnetic Grey TE
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 01:51 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 124
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 124
|
FWIW, i went on a road trip last year in a 2012 highlander and it drives a lot better on the highway than my 4runner.
__________________
2011 blizzard pearl LE ~ OEM bells & whistles ~ tint ~ Satoshi grill ~ WeatherTechs ~ Camelback Metal Gear roof rack
Front Suspension: MetalTech 2.5" lift Icon coilovers & shocks /Rear Suspension: Icon shocks w/ 3''
OME coils ~ Front & Rear CBI steel bumpers ~ Rigid LED light bar
Fuel Trophy 17x8.5 rims ~ 285/70r17 Mickey Thompson MTZ's ~ LR UCA's ~ Rocker panel chop ~ N-fab steps
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 01:57 AM
|
#7
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gobius
Yep, if you're even considering a Highlander and a CX-9, then you'll probably be happier with the Highlander.
|
Let me clarify. If it was my choice alone, I would buy a Subaru WRX.
However, my wife (not me!) wants 'an SUV'. I was wondering which SUV can potentially offer ME a potential for fun. The Highlander is nice, but super-boring.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:00 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Beacon Hill
Age: 37
Posts: 1,222
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Beacon Hill
Age: 37
Posts: 1,222
|
Wife would enjoy the Highlander a lot more. My auntie has one and her kids love riding in it.
Especially with the 2014+ 4Runners, most females consider then too "aggressive" in the front but the 4th gens are good looking in their books.
If you plan to drive an SUV offroad on just gravel roads/grass but not rough terrain with mud, dirt and primitive roads I would opt the Highlander or even a Pilot.
Last edited by Seattle206; 12-30-2014 at 02:03 AM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:05 AM
|
#9
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
Highlander for the win for you.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:13 AM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: the meadows n the desert
Age: 73
Posts: 3,160
Real Name: Mike
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: the meadows n the desert
Age: 73
Posts: 3,160
Real Name: Mike
|
Assume we're talking 2wd ? If so highlander for sure rides like a camry & the best part of an suv IMO is being up higher to see traffic which to me is super important especially if you have kids ! The advantage to see ahead is a luxury with as many bad drivers out there . Also have awd if needed !
__________________
2011 SR5 Mgm 4x4 alpharex pro headlights & depo black tail lights level 8 trackers wheels & p285/70/17 cooper at3s, 6112s all around set 2.5 rear rancho spacer 11/4, FJ coils TRD intake.w/afe-dry filter Urd y-pipe flowmaster super70ii TE roofrails! 2014 Sr5 Superwhite Bils 6112s/eibach 2.5 /1 "rear springs 285s Cooper at3 ms on fj pc-d satin black, Urd y-pipe/Flow delta 50 muffler/all interior led lights & low beams sealights h7 led with laminx yellow fogs & oldreds puddle harness w/2010-13 mirrors
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:20 AM
|
#11
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 471
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 471
|
The Highlander is crossover, the 4Runner is a body on a frame truck.
The Highlander will ride better, it's smoother, the steering is more precise, the turning radius is smaller, it'll brake better, etc, etc, etc, it's an easier to drive vehicle, it's like a big car.
The 4Runner is bigger, higher, MUCH burlier, better off road, better in bad weather, it can haul more, it can tow more, it can accidentally back over your miata if you're not paying attention. It's a big, burly, rugged, reliable go (almost) anywhere truck.
Neither one is better than the other, it's all about using the right tool for the job. If you look under a Highlander it's a McPherson Strut front suspension, independent rear suspension, small axles, small driveshafts, small differentials, small control arms... it's a big cushy AWD hatchback. You look under a 4Runner and it's a solid rear axle, skid plates, huge suspension components, bulky drivetrain, big everything... it's a truck with a full body. They are totally different classes of vehicles, if you're cross shopping a CX9 a 4Runner is not what you're looking for.
__________________
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:31 AM
|
#12
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 16
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 16
|
There is more vertical clearance in a miata with the top down than any suv
I have a 97 Miata (supercharged) a 94 4R SR5 and 2012 T4R trail with KDSS. Before purchasing the trail I rented several suv's including a Jeep, a Caddie, a highlander and test drove a CX9. Of all the vehicles the T4R Trail was the best handling on the road. The lack of manual box is annoying but I have gotten use to it and frequently use manual selection of gears especially on twisty roads. I liked the handling of the highlander and I drove both on and off road -rutted and steep gravel roads covered in snow and ice and the AWD worked well in all situations I encountered. Generally a good ride but softer than my trail. I liked the highlander and shortlisted it. Especially the price compared to the Trail.
The Highlander I think has easier access for driver and passengers (not as high off the ground)
The T4R with KDSS has thicker roll bars which help in the handling coupled with manual selection of gears makes for an all round joy in driving on road.
Now the T4Rs have stability control and if the ecu thinks you are going too fast round a bend it will "break" the outside front wheel causing the front end to wash out of the bend. When it first happens it does cause certain muscles to contract. The SR5 and trail are both part time 4X4 , which means they are rear wheel drive when not in 4x4. It's definitely not a miata but for a big truck the handling is excellent. The T4R is an off road truck that handles well on the road. If you are considering T4R do test drive a trail with KDSS before you decide. Now I will admit my Trail spends nearly 100% of its time on the road but when it has been in adverse conditions it has performed exceptionally well……which just means you will have the capability of getting really stuck in a really remote place!
…as for space the miata wins….I needed to transport a compressor and tall air tank that had to be kept vertical so the oil would stay in place. So it was top down in the miata with the thing squeezed between the center console and the door with window down in the passenger seat…oh and it was snowing.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:38 AM
|
#13
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 135
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 135
|
You sound like a car enthusiast with a miata taken to the track and the desire for a WRX. The 4Runner is more of an enthusiast vehicle than a highlander. If it is mainly for you to drive, then consider the 4Runner. If it is mainly for your wife, then she would likely be happier in the highlander. You could also consider a used SUV and a WRX
__________________
2015 TRD Pro - super white
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:39 AM
|
#14
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudiTech
The Highlander is crossover, the 4Runner is a body on a frame truck.
The Highlander will ride better, it's smoother, the steering is more precise, the turning radius is smaller, it'll brake better, etc, etc, etc, it's an easier to drive vehicle, it's like a big car.
The 4Runner is bigger, higher, MUCH burlier, better off road, better in bad weather, it can haul more, it can tow more, it can accidentally back over your miata if you're not paying attention. It's a big, burly, rugged, reliable go (almost) anywhere truck.
Neither one is better than the other, it's all about using the right tool for the job. If you look under a Highlander it's a McPherson Strut front suspension, independent rear suspension, small axles, small driveshafts, small differentials, small control arms... it's a big cushy AWD hatchback. You look under a 4Runner and it's a solid rear axle, skid plates, huge suspension components, bulky drivetrain, big everything... it's a truck with a full body. They are totally different classes of vehicles, if you're cross shopping a CX9 a 4Runner is not what you're looking for.
|
That was an excellent explanation. Thank you!
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-30-2014, 02:53 AM
|
#15
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 107
|
Thank you all for the informative replies. I now have a much better idea of what is involved.
My wife is asking: which of these vehicles is easier to get into trouble (accident) with for a causal driver: 4Runner or Highlander/CX9?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|