Home Menu

Site Navigation


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 18 votes, 2.83 average. Display Modes
Old 10-28-2016, 05:03 PM #181
AdmiralAugbar's Avatar
AdmiralAugbar AdmiralAugbar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 248
AdmiralAugbar is on a distinguished road
AdmiralAugbar AdmiralAugbar is offline
Member
AdmiralAugbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 248
AdmiralAugbar is on a distinguished road
Just received my AT3/W LT in 275 70 18 for my 4th gen. Getting them mounted Tuesday, tires look great and got an excellent deal on them.
__________________
2006 Limited V8 - 1.25" wheel spacers | 275/70/18 LT Falken A/T3W | Bilstein 5100s | OME 885 springs in front | FJ springs in rear | LED light bar | Rhino Rack X-Tray
AdmiralAugbar is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 10:33 AM #182
Decipher's Avatar
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
Decipher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by e60ral View Post
that's overinflated for P tires


The max pressure on these in p-rated fashion is 55psi. So I don't think 40 is overinflated especially when we're only talking 2 psi between what most people are running and the 40 I stated.

Nonetheless I dropped them to 38 and surprise surprise, I can't tell any difference in anything; bulge, MPG, or ride quality. Either way, thanks for the input but I don't think 40 is too high for a tire rates to 55 max pressure. I think we can all agree the recommended 32 is waaaaay too low.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Anger Fuels Motion...Motion Fuels Momentum...Momentum Fuels Action...DO SOMETHING!

2010 4Runner SR5
Decipher is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 10:37 AM #183
zefram47's Avatar
zefram47 zefram47 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arvada, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 101
Real Name: Aaron
zefram47 is on a distinguished road
zefram47 zefram47 is offline
Member
zefram47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arvada, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 101
Real Name: Aaron
zefram47 is on a distinguished road
I'm about to buy a set of these, but can't decide between the P-metric and the LT (stock 265/70/17 size)...wish they made them in LT-C load. Probably going to call Falken and see if they have a recommendation, but have any of you run the P's off-road and have either good things to say or problems you've had as a result? Being in CO, we have a lot of rock to deal with, but if I can avoid it, I don't want to deal with the weight penalty of the E-load. Also, the silica rubber compound is only available on the P-metric, and is another reason the LTs have deeper tread depth...the P's apparently wear better than the LT compound.
__________________
2016 TEP w/KDSS - Nautical Blue
TRD Matte Grey Wheels | Falken AT3W LT265/70R17
RCI Sliders | RCI Skids (front/trans/t-case/filler/lower-link)
Toytec Boss 2.5 | Rokmen Rear LCAs | SPC UCAs
zefram47 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 11:27 AM #184
zefram47's Avatar
zefram47 zefram47 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arvada, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 101
Real Name: Aaron
zefram47 is on a distinguished road
zefram47 zefram47 is offline
Member
zefram47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arvada, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 101
Real Name: Aaron
zefram47 is on a distinguished road
Just spoke with a rep at Falken. They confirmed 2-ply sidewall construction on both LT and P, with a bit more robustness on the LTs. Recommended tire pressure on the P was the standard 32, but possibly as high as 36 psi. For the LTs, the guy told me 48-49 psi, which seems a bit high. As much highway as I'm likely to run and unknown how much off-road I'm going to do, still leaning towards P, but really not sure.
__________________
2016 TEP w/KDSS - Nautical Blue
TRD Matte Grey Wheels | Falken AT3W LT265/70R17
RCI Sliders | RCI Skids (front/trans/t-case/filler/lower-link)
Toytec Boss 2.5 | Rokmen Rear LCAs | SPC UCAs
zefram47 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 02:13 PM #185
rshawiii's Avatar
rshawiii rshawiii is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Lake City Colorado
Posts: 17
rshawiii is on a distinguished road
rshawiii rshawiii is offline
Junior Member
rshawiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Lake City Colorado
Posts: 17
rshawiii is on a distinguished road
looking at buying a new sr5 or trail. These seem to come with M+S, nothing special tires. considering swapping them out for something better in snow/ice. I have had good experience with M+S rated Falkens on a pickup truck, so I'm good with that brand.

Do you know if these tires have the mountain snowflake symbol that designates them as a winter/snow/ice tire or are they an M+S ????

How about hard highway driving noise ?
rshawiii is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 02:18 PM #186
Lightenup_bro's Avatar
Lightenup_bro Lightenup_bro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 187
Real Name: Austin
Lightenup_bro is on a distinguished road
Lightenup_bro Lightenup_bro is offline
Member
Lightenup_bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 187
Real Name: Austin
Lightenup_bro is on a distinguished road
I've set a time Saturday morning to get a set of the 285/70/17 P installed. I like the silica compound (which should help in wet conditions) which you don't get in the LT. The less weight per tire is also a plus.

If you are going this route check out discount tire's ebay store. $100 off for a tire purchase of $400 +.
__________________
'16 TE (KDSS Delete) / other goodies
Lightenup_bro is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 02:26 PM #187
Lightenup_bro's Avatar
Lightenup_bro Lightenup_bro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 187
Real Name: Austin
Lightenup_bro is on a distinguished road
Lightenup_bro Lightenup_bro is offline
Member
Lightenup_bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 187
Real Name: Austin
Lightenup_bro is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by rshawiii View Post
Do you know if these tires have the mountain snowflake symbol that designates them as a winter/snow/ice tire or are they an M+S ????
These are severe snow rated.
__________________
'16 TE (KDSS Delete) / other goodies
Lightenup_bro is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 03:36 PM #188
zefram47's Avatar
zefram47 zefram47 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arvada, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 101
Real Name: Aaron
zefram47 is on a distinguished road
zefram47 zefram47 is offline
Member
zefram47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arvada, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 101
Real Name: Aaron
zefram47 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightenup_bro View Post
I've set a time Saturday morning to get a set of the 285/70/17 P installed. I like the silica compound (which should help in wet conditions) which you don't get in the LT. The less weight per tire is also a plus.

If you are going this route check out discount tire's ebay store. $100 off for a tire purchase of $400 +.
That was another thing the Falken rep told me... The LT version does have the silica rubber compound, but the P version has 20% more silica-rubber than the LT version. The additional silica is apparently to help the P version have the same mileage warranty as the LT with 4/32nds less tread depth.
__________________
2016 TEP w/KDSS - Nautical Blue
TRD Matte Grey Wheels | Falken AT3W LT265/70R17
RCI Sliders | RCI Skids (front/trans/t-case/filler/lower-link)
Toytec Boss 2.5 | Rokmen Rear LCAs | SPC UCAs
zefram47 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 03:45 PM #189
BigMike603 BigMike603 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Nashua NH
Posts: 32
BigMike603 is on a distinguished road
BigMike603 BigMike603 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Nashua NH
Posts: 32
BigMike603 is on a distinguished road
So after going back and forth with the place I bought my tires from, and a call to Falken, they replaced my front tires to see if the shaking at 60 MPH would stop. Well I still have a shake at 60 MPH, and I convinced them to replace the rear tires which will be done on Wednesday. We will see if this helps but I am thinking it is the vehicle. I have talked to 2 other people with the same shake at 60 MPH and they were running different tires. Anyone else heard of this?

I had a chance to run these tire a couple weeks ago on the highway in a torrential down pour and the tires never skipped a beat. At 55 Mph I never had a bit of hydroplaning. It is getting colder here in NH so hopefully I will be able to test the snow traction soon.
BigMike603 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 04:36 PM #190
1engineer's Avatar
1engineer 1engineer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light
1engineer 1engineer is offline
Moderator
1engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decipher View Post
The max pressure on these in p-rated fashion is 55psi. So I don't think 40 is overinflated especially when we're only talking 2 psi between what most people are running and the 40 I stated.

Nonetheless I dropped them to 38 and surprise surprise, I can't tell any difference in anything; bulge, MPG, or ride quality. Either way, thanks for the input but I don't think 40 is too high for a tire rates to 55 max pressure. I think we can all agree the recommended 32 is waaaaay too low.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And you think the tire pressure is predicated on bulge, MPG or ride quality? Tell me, what is your justification for running 40 psi? Calculations? Data?
1engineer is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 04:39 PM #191
Decipher's Avatar
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
Decipher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
New Falken AT tire (A/T3W)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1engineer View Post
And you think the tire pressure is predicated on bulge, MPG or ride quality? Tell me, what is your justification for running 40 psi? Calculations? Data?


What is YOUR justification for running less?

I have done the chalk line test and my runner rides perfectly even at 40. So I'm good at 38 but whoa, 40 is ludicrous? Come on...

Besides, I said I'm down to 38 AND thanked those who made that recommendation. So what's the issue here?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Anger Fuels Motion...Motion Fuels Momentum...Momentum Fuels Action...DO SOMETHING!

2010 4Runner SR5

Last edited by Decipher; 10-31-2016 at 04:49 PM.
Decipher is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 04:40 PM #192
Lightenup_bro's Avatar
Lightenup_bro Lightenup_bro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 187
Real Name: Austin
Lightenup_bro is on a distinguished road
Lightenup_bro Lightenup_bro is offline
Member
Lightenup_bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 187
Real Name: Austin
Lightenup_bro is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by zefram47 View Post
That was another thing the Falken rep told me... The LT version does have the silica rubber compound, but the P version has 20% more silica-rubber than the LT version. The additional silica is apparently to help the P version have the same mileage warranty as the LT with 4/32nds less tread depth.
Well geez....Can't they update their website then haha.
__________________
'16 TE (KDSS Delete) / other goodies
Lightenup_bro is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 04:46 PM #193
Decipher's Avatar
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
Decipher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
New Falken AT tire (A/T3W)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zefram47 View Post
I'm about to buy a set of these, but can't decide between the P-metric and the LT (stock 265/70/17 size)...wish they made them in LT-C load. Probably going to call Falken and see if they have a recommendation, but have any of you run the P's off-road and have either good things to say or problems you've had as a result? Being in CO, we have a lot of rock to deal with, but if I can avoid it, I don't want to deal with the weight penalty of the E-load. Also, the silica rubber compound is only available on the P-metric, and is another reason the LTs have deeper tread depth...the P's apparently wear better than the LT compound.


I've done a good amount of off roading, but it's Illinois where it's mostly just hard packed dirt and mud. I'm perfectly content with the P-Rated version since they seem to be a good balance between road manners and my off road necessity.

All of that being said, if you think you'll be encountering a lot or even a fair share of rock, the LT will give you some peace of mind that may be worth the money. I would have gone LT under those conditions. I'm not in the least bit disappointed in my choice so if you won't see excessive amounts of rock, don't hesitate on the P series. Your call though.

Just want to add that after about 5,000 miles these tires are an absolute pleasure both on and off road. I've picked up a little road noise but nothing bad at all.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Anger Fuels Motion...Motion Fuels Momentum...Momentum Fuels Action...DO SOMETHING!

2010 4Runner SR5

Last edited by Decipher; 10-31-2016 at 04:52 PM.
Decipher is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 04:51 PM #194
1engineer's Avatar
1engineer 1engineer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light
1engineer 1engineer is offline
Moderator
1engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light 1engineer is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decipher View Post
What is YOUR justification for running less?

I have done the chalk line test and my runner rides perfectly even at 40. So I'm good at 38 but whoa, 40 is ludicrous? Come on...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Calculations. Engineering. Design. Analysis. Tables. Recommendations from people who design this stuff.

I didn't say you were good at 38. I didn't say 40 was too much. I just wanted to know WHY you picked 40. Seat of the pants engineering? Just a feeling? Looked good?

That last one seems to be most people's answer. Oh, way to redirect. I asked you a question and you just turned it around. I answered your question above though.

I'll make sure to take your future posts to heart.
1engineer is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 10-31-2016, 05:02 PM #195
Decipher's Avatar
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
Decipher Decipher is offline
Member
Decipher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chicagoland (Ugh)
Posts: 902
Real Name: B-Money
Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough Decipher is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1engineer View Post
Calculations. Engineering. Design. Analysis. Tables. Recommendations from people who design this stuff.



I didn't say you were good at 38. I didn't say 40 was too much. I just wanted to know WHY you picked 40. Seat of the pants engineering? Just a feeling? Looked good?



That last one seems to be most people's answer.


You did ALL those things? Do you work for Falken's R&D department?

I decided on 40 after the chalk line test. Seemed like the best balance plus I was towing trailers so I prefer to air up and found it to be a good compromise. After reading through here, including your post, I decided maybe 40 was too high for daily and dropped to 38. Chalk line is still even and the ride may be marginally more forgiving. 32 is way too low in my experience. 38-40 seems good but I have no issue at the current 38. If anyone isn't sure, chalk line your tire and pick what works for you. I'm apparently within 2 psi of Falken's recommendation. Now we're splitting hairs.

At the end of the day, this is like arguing which oil is best. You have to pick what's right for you and call out the people dispelling bad info for others. Even at 40, it's far from the rated max pressure so it's not like I'm telling people to use cooking oil in their truck. Your mileage may vary.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Anger Fuels Motion...Motion Fuels Momentum...Momentum Fuels Action...DO SOMETHING!

2010 4Runner SR5
Decipher is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4Runner in Falken ad in Outside Magazine Paisano 5th gen T4Rs 8 08-19-2015 05:15 PM
Goodyear vs Falken Jbot 3rd gen T4Rs 29 07-16-2014 07:00 PM
Falken Wildpeak A/T Thoughts? jswinkT4R Classic T4Rs 14 02-16-2014 05:47 PM
Falken Wild Peak A/T Paulie6909 4th Gen T4Rs 11 10-30-2011 12:49 PM
Falken Tires...your thoughts... njharrell Engines / Suspension / Wheels / Tires / Audio / Accessories 2 10-25-2009 03:36 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
***This site is an unofficial Toyota site, and is not officially endorsed, supported, authorized by or affiliated with Toyota. All company, product, or service names references in this web site are used for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Toyota name, marks, designs and logos, as well as Toyota model names, are registered trademarks of Toyota Motor Corporation***Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
 
Copyright © 2020