User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-07-2019, 10:07 PM #1
Hammeredsole Hammeredsole is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Posts: 30
Hammeredsole will become famous soon enough
Hammeredsole Hammeredsole is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Posts: 30
Hammeredsole will become famous soon enough
PSA: Your Amazon Hi-beam LED headlights are garbage.

I posted this in another forum, and I figured I would share it here. I realize that I'm not the most subtle person, but I feel that this issue needs to be discussed. On an almost daily basis I am blinded at night by someone who "upgraded" their headlights in their car. This was a well recognized issue with HID's, causing them to fall out of favor. Lately, however, LED retro-fit manufacturers have taken the torch of creating bulbs that claim "Proper Placement". This is true, only to the extent that the center of the LED emitter matches the placement of the center of the incandescent coil. Marketing material completely disregards the void where no emitters are present on roughly 90º of bulb circumference, nor do they discuss that the emitter profile is physically larger than the incandescent coil itself.

I posted this is response to a bunch of folks fluffing up the Xenon Depot 9005 retrofits, that they were raving about working with their DRL. If you don't feel like reading the whole thing, I will sum it up. Retrofitting LED 9005 bulbs is NOT an upgrade. You are paying for the color alone, and actually losing lighting performance. If you're okay with that, cool, but don't think your getting anything useful out of the equation.
__________________________________________________ _______________

The geometric reflector of the hi-beams is tuned for a very small incandescent filament that emits all of its light in a 360 degree pattern from a very small surface area emitter. An LED, on the other hand, emits all of its light from 2 panels that emit at only about 270 degrees from a relative surface area that is about 2-3x larger than the filament of an equivalent incandescent bulb.

So, from emitter placement alone, we have an LED that is engaging entirely different parts of the reflector design, putting light where it doesn't belong. Additionally, entire portions of the reflector aren't being engaged at all, due to the 2 sided design of LED bulbs. So, the net effect is an apparent increase in brightness because suddenly there is LIGHT EVERYWHERE! Wow, these things are bright, and that must be better, right?

The 9011 is roughly a 2,350 lumen bulb, and I'll (arbitrarily) give an optimistic Chinese LED headlight 3,350 lumens to give it a clear 1,000 lumen advantage. The long lasting OEM 9005 are roughly 1,550 lumens for reference.

We have the 9011 that will engage the reflector at exactly the right angles, putting exactly the right light pattern for Hi-beams onto the road; a narrow focused cone of light. All of the 2,350 lumens are projected to precisely where they need to be.

We have the LED with 3,350 lumens, engaging the reflector at the wrong angles, scattering the light over entirely new areas of the road. It appears bright, because there is more light. But much of the light isn't where it's supposed to be. In effect, the reflector is scavenging less light from the designed emitter geometry. If you trimmed the LED emitter size to be the same as the incandescent coil, lumens would be far less than the extremely condensed 9011 incan coil area. They are getting more lumens by making a larger surface.

Next would be CRI, or color rendering index. Which is an easy Wikipedia read, but in summary: the cool white LED is actually worse for depth perception and detail recognition than a good old incandescent. In fact, LED manufacturers make great strides to get LED color closer to incandescent. Color temperature and CRI often follow each other, but are not the same. A warm LED with the same 2700k color temp as incandescent will still never be 100 CRI. It is very expensive to build a high CRI LED, and also decreases the efficacy of the LED output at a given amperage in comparison to a "cool" white. In practice, high CRI (incan) also causes markedly less glare and eye strain than low CRI LED's (cool whites). A good way to think of this is this: 1 single high CRI (100) lumen is 100% effective to the human eye, while a low CRI (65) lumen is only 65% effective to the human eye. It's not quite that simple, but it's an easy way to understand. The 9011 bulb is 100 CRI (although lacking in the blue spectrum... blue is not desirable in night time driving anyways), while the LED in question is absolutely no higher than 80 (even if it was a high end warm Nichia bulb, which its not), it's more likely in the mid 60's.

Sure, LED headlight's lumen output is higher when it is measured at the emitter. However, I would wager that the candela measured at a distance of 100m from an LED (when installed in an incandescent reflector housing) is drastically lower than a good incandescent bulb in the same housing.

People are literally paying for less real world performance and reliability. To top it off, they are now blinding other drivers when they're driving around in their car with super cool LED headlights.

A cool way to understand how the reflectors are working is to grab a low powered flashlight, go out to your car, and really try to find the incandescent coil reflection in the reflector housing bands. You will see that it is almost like looking at the coil with a magnifying glass. Try the same with an LED, and you will see that you can see large areas of the reflector are engaging circuit board material, and entirely new areas of the reflector are engaging LED emitter from entirely inappropriate angles.

Marketing will have you think the LED emitters "are in proper placement"... sure they are, enough to sell a bunch of product. A final kick in the balls is that the Xenon Depot 9005 are merely rated to 1,750 lumens, meaning they have a very marginal increase over OEM 1,550 incandescent bulbs, with all of the draw backs of improper emitter placement and lower CRI, but they also have a MASSIVE 600 lumen deficit to the homely 9011 (at approximately 400% the cost of a pair of 9011).

Last edited by Hammeredsole; 11-07-2019 at 10:17 PM.
Hammeredsole is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-07-2019, 10:26 PM #2
JMZ400's Avatar
JMZ400 JMZ400 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central FL
Posts: 148
JMZ400 will become famous soon enough
JMZ400 JMZ400 is offline
Member
JMZ400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central FL
Posts: 148
JMZ400 will become famous soon enough
X100!

I'm blinded nightly

Sent from my SM-A205U using Tapatalk
__________________
2012 Trail Edition
2006 SR5 V6 Sold
1981 FJ40
1991 CRX Si - Sort Of
JMZ400 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-07-2019, 11:06 PM #3
ax2021 ax2021 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 202
ax2021 will become famous soon enough ax2021 will become famous soon enough
ax2021 ax2021 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 202
ax2021 will become famous soon enough ax2021 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammeredsole View Post
I posted this in another forum, and I figured I would share it here. I realize that I'm not the most subtle person, but I feel that this issue needs to be discussed. On an almost daily basis I am blinded at night by someone who "upgraded" their headlights in their car. This was a well recognized issue with HID's, causing them to fall out of favor. Lately, however, LED retro-fit manufacturers have taken the torch of creating bulbs that claim "Proper Placement". This is true, only to the extent that the center of the LED emitter matches the placement of the center of the incandescent coil. Marketing material completely disregards the void where no emitters are present on roughly 90º of bulb circumference, nor do they discuss that the emitter profile is physically larger than the incandescent coil itself.

I posted this is response to a bunch of folks fluffing up the Xenon Depot 9005 retrofits, that they were raving about working with their DRL. If you don't feel like reading the whole thing, I will sum it up. Retrofitting LED 9005 bulbs is NOT an upgrade. You are paying for the color alone, and actually losing lighting performance. If you're okay with that, cool, but don't think your getting anything useful out of the equation.
__________________________________________________ _______________

The geometric reflector of the hi-beams is tuned for a very small incandescent filament that emits all of its light in a 360 degree pattern from a very small surface area emitter. An LED, on the other hand, emits all of its light from 2 panels that emit at only about 270 degrees from a relative surface area that is about 2-3x larger than the filament of an equivalent incandescent bulb.

So, from emitter placement alone, we have an LED that is engaging entirely different parts of the reflector design, putting light where it doesn't belong. Additionally, entire portions of the reflector aren't being engaged at all, due to the 2 sided design of LED bulbs. So, the net effect is an apparent increase in brightness because suddenly there is LIGHT EVERYWHERE! Wow, these things are bright, and that must be better, right?

The 9011 is roughly a 2,350 lumen bulb, and I'll (arbitrarily) give an optimistic Chinese LED headlight 3,350 lumens to give it a clear 1,000 lumen advantage. The long lasting OEM 9005 are roughly 1,550 lumens for reference.

We have the 9011 that will engage the reflector at exactly the right angles, putting exactly the right light pattern for Hi-beams onto the road; a narrow focused cone of light. All of the 2,350 lumens are projected to precisely where they need to be.

We have the LED with 3,350 lumens, engaging the reflector at the wrong angles, scattering the light over entirely new areas of the road. It appears bright, because there is more light. But much of the light isn't where it's supposed to be. In effect, the reflector is scavenging less light from the designed emitter geometry. If you trimmed the LED emitter size to be the same as the incandescent coil, lumens would be far less than the extremely condensed 9011 incan coil area. They are getting more lumens by making a larger surface.

Next would be CRI, or color rendering index. Which is an easy Wikipedia read, but in summary: the cool white LED is actually worse for depth perception and detail recognition than a good old incandescent. In fact, LED manufacturers make great strides to get LED color closer to incandescent. Color temperature and CRI often follow each other, but are not the same. A warm LED with the same 2700k color temp as incandescent will still never be 100 CRI. It is very expensive to build a high CRI LED, and also decreases the efficacy of the LED output at a given amperage in comparison to a "cool" white. In practice, high CRI (incan) also causes markedly less glare and eye strain than low CRI LED's (cool whites). A good way to think of this is this: 1 single high CRI (100) lumen is 100% effective to the human eye, while a low CRI (65) lumen is only 65% effective to the human eye. It's not quite that simple, but it's an easy way to understand. The 9011 bulb is 100 CRI (although lacking in the blue spectrum... blue is not desirable in night time driving anyways), while the LED in question is absolutely no higher than 80 (even if it was a high end warm Nichia bulb, which its not), it's more likely in the mid 60's.

Sure, LED headlight's lumen output is higher when it is measured at the emitter. However, I would wager that the candela measured at a distance of 100m from an LED (when installed in an incandescent reflector housing) is drastically lower than a good incandescent bulb in the same housing.

People are literally paying for less real world performance and reliability. To top it off, they are now blinding other drivers when they're driving around in their car with super cool LED headlights.

A cool way to understand how the reflectors are working is to grab a low powered flashlight, go out to your car, and really try to find the incandescent coil reflection in the reflector housing bands. You will see that it is almost like looking at the coil with a magnifying glass. Try the same with an LED, and you will see that you can see large areas of the reflector are engaging circuit board material, and entirely new areas of the reflector are engaging LED emitter from entirely inappropriate angles.

Marketing will have you think the LED emitters "are in proper placement"... sure they are, enough to sell a bunch of product. A final kick in the balls is that the Xenon Depot 9005 are merely rated to 1,750 lumens, meaning they have a very marginal increase over OEM 1,550 incandescent bulbs, with all of the draw backs of improper emitter placement and lower CRI, but they also have a MASSIVE 600 lumen deficit to the homely 9011 (at approximately 400% the cost of a pair of 9011).


Agree 100%. . I drive ~140K ml a year sick and tired of those aftermarket (upgrades)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ax2021 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-07-2019, 11:07 PM #4
Matze's Avatar
Matze Matze is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Real Name: Matt
Matze will become famous soon enough
Matze Matze is offline
Member
Matze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Real Name: Matt
Matze will become famous soon enough
Amen


Seriously, the OP is right!
Let’s make it clear, a lot of light is surely safer BUT only when it end up in the right spots - in case it doesn’t you’ll get the opposite effect. Maybe the blinded oncoming traffic “decided” to turn than ugly blinding light off and dumb there vehicles directly into yours - it could be pretty awful.
but, depending on speed, it doesn’t hurt for long.

So don’t buy sh.., do it right or don’t do it at all
__________________
2020 black ORP
Matze is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-07-2019, 11:11 PM #5
halusha halusha is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 50
halusha will become famous soon enough
halusha halusha is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 50
halusha will become famous soon enough
Gotta agree, you would be better off replacing your incandescents more often (and so much cheaper) than retrofit LEDs. If you really want LEDs you should buy a whole new housing that was built for it.
halusha is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-07-2019, 11:33 PM #6
spartacus's Avatar
spartacus spartacus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: denver
Posts: 3,010
spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of
spartacus spartacus is offline
Senior Member
spartacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: denver
Posts: 3,010
spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of spartacus has much to be proud of
I agree with the OP. On a two lane narrow state highway it gets dangerous specially when there is no shoulder and the oncoming traffic blinding you driving in the front range through the mountain roads.
spartacus is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 04:33 PM #7
tm965 tm965 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 536
tm965 is a jewel in the rough tm965 is a jewel in the rough tm965 is a jewel in the rough
tm965 tm965 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 536
tm965 is a jewel in the rough tm965 is a jewel in the rough tm965 is a jewel in the rough
good leds in the high beams are so vastly superior to incandescent bulbs its clear to me that the posters that say otherwise have never been the behind the drivers seat of a car equipped with them. i do, however, admit that they are blinding as DRL and should not be used as such. but as a high beam, the throw is so so much further
tm965 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 04:45 PM #8
TrkyMfns's Avatar
TrkyMfns TrkyMfns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 197
TrkyMfns is on a distinguished road
TrkyMfns TrkyMfns is offline
Member
TrkyMfns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 197
TrkyMfns is on a distinguished road
Proper HID's in a vehicle that comes with them from the factory have always been my favorite. They throw light very far. I always figured they were better than LED's, but maybe I am wrong. HID's do suck in the rain though lol.
__________________
2011 SR5/P 4WD Blizzard Pearl - 285/70/17 Falken Wildpeak AT3/W - Bilstein 5100 Lift @ 2.5 - SPC UCA's - Two-Tone Katzkin Interior - 15% Lumar Pinnacle Ceramic Tint - Canvasback Liner - Husky Weatherbeater Liners - Phillips Interior LED's - Completely upgraded ICE.
TrkyMfns is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 04:55 PM #9
jp.vegas jp.vegas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 831
jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light
jp.vegas jp.vegas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 831
jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light
That's all well and good, but when Toyota decided to mount LED fogs at 4500-5000K paired with incandescent low and high beams at 2700K, it looks like ass.

Bring me the 5K incandesents and I'm on board.

Note: This is mostly tongue in cheek. Mostly. It does look like ass.
__________________
'20 Army Green 4Runner TRD PRO
'16 Quicksand Tundra TRD PRO Gone
'08 Salsa Red Pearl 4x4Runner SE V6:
Gone
jp.vegas is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 05:13 PM #10
1jzgte 1jzgte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,184
1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice
1jzgte 1jzgte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,184
1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice
good LEDs are not sold on amazon at all. PERIOD.

good led's come from OEM lighting ONLY. PERIOD. no ifs or buts!
1jzgte is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 05:15 PM #11
1jzgte 1jzgte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,184
1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice
1jzgte 1jzgte is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,184
1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice 1jzgte is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by ax2021 View Post
Agree 100%. . I drive ~140K ml a year sick and tired of those aftermarket (upgrades)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
thank frigging god my cars now have auto dimming rear views.. never thought i would ever care for this feature
1jzgte is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 05:29 PM #12
Matze's Avatar
Matze Matze is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Real Name: Matt
Matze will become famous soon enough
Matze Matze is offline
Member
Matze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Real Name: Matt
Matze will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jp.vegas View Post
That's all well and good, but when Toyota decided to mount LED fogs at 4500-5000K paired with incandescent low and high beams at 2700K, it looks like ass.

Bring me the 5K incandesents and I'm on board.

Note: This is mostly tongue in cheek. Mostly. It does look like ass.
Is there so much fog around Vegas all the time?

Fog lights as the name maybe reveal are for foggy weather, the lower attachment purposes to shine below the fog. The headlights should be off in that case since they would only bright up the fog...

Sure, I seen fog lights misuse before, especially teens use them to show receptiveness or something like that but I think you’re one of those!?
__________________
2020 black ORP
Matze is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 06:00 PM #13
jp.vegas jp.vegas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 831
jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light
jp.vegas jp.vegas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 831
jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light jp.vegas is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matze View Post
Is there so much fog around Vegas all the time?

Fog lights as the name maybe reveal are for foggy weather, the lower attachment purposes to shine below the fog. The headlights should be off in that case since they would only bright up the fog...

Sure, I seen fog lights misuse before, especially teens use them to show receptiveness or something like that but I think you’re one of those!?
Here's the thing, they're useful in dust too ;) but Toyota in their infinite wisdom defaults to requiring the headlights to be on in order for the fogs to be on as well.
__________________
'20 Army Green 4Runner TRD PRO
'16 Quicksand Tundra TRD PRO Gone
'08 Salsa Red Pearl 4x4Runner SE V6:
Gone
jp.vegas is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 06:38 PM #14
Matze's Avatar
Matze Matze is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Real Name: Matt
Matze will become famous soon enough
Matze Matze is offline
Member
Matze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Real Name: Matt
Matze will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jp.vegas View Post
Here's the thing, they're useful in dust too ;) but Toyota in their infinite wisdom defaults to requiring the headlights to be on in order for the fogs to be on as well.

My bad, I did not except that kind of stupidity from a manufacturer.
Fact is that the fogs definitely give better light in conditions like fog, heavy dust or even heavy rain but not when combined with headlights.
But I can imagine that’s a easy fix!

Anyway, the thing is that a lot of this “bright up your stock headlight”-kits are unsafe since they blind almost everyone else and that can’t be the solution!

I mean back in the days a h4 In a ordinary reflector housing was the common headlight, hard to imagine but a lot of people, me included, survived the lack of illumination.
__________________
2020 black ORP
Matze is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 06:46 PM #15
jhguth jhguth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,305
jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold
jhguth jhguth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,305
jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold jhguth is a splendid one to behold
My biggest complaint about the factory headlights is that they are too high, even if you make them brighter they are still too high.


I plan on fitting driving lights in the factory fog light location it just hasn't made it to the top of my priority list yet
jhguth is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Tags
cri , incandescent , led , light , reflector

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High beam headlights N2TRKYS 5th gen T4Rs 50 02-14-2018 12:46 AM
Low/High Beam Headlights not working Bimmerod 3rd gen T4Rs 3 03-22-2016 12:10 AM
Recommend bulbs for low beam headlights? Range 4th Gen T4Rs 14 12-30-2014 01:13 PM
Amazon LED Headlights jeff88 3rd gen T4Rs 4 12-12-2014 07:49 AM
Anything special about Quad Beam Halogen Headlights? Thai General Discussions 3 09-03-2009 03:55 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
***This site is an unofficial Toyota site, and is not officially endorsed, supported, authorized by or affiliated with Toyota. All company, product, or service names references in this web site are used for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Toyota name, marks, designs and logos, as well as Toyota model names, are registered trademarks of Toyota Motor Corporation***Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
 
Copyright © 2020