Originally Posted by Humble Leader

is rich a troll sometimes (Like 90% of the time): yes
do his threads generate interesting discussion and different points: yes
do said threads generate lots of posts / views: yes
will you laugh at his threads: yes

trolls play a vital role in the forum ecosystem. good trolling will generate views and create some interesting threads. interesting content keeps people coming back. just like any ecosystem, a balance is required and the trolls must be kept in check

sure people will get rustled jimmies now and then, but you can't deny, you click on every richinridgewood thread

Originally Posted by Nalcyon

Well said humbler leader. I am enjoying reading the discussion. I am on the side of liking the 4runner BECAUSE of the lack of modern features. Things that mattered to me were reliability, simplicity, payload, capability off road. If I could have gotten a 4runner with manual tranny, manual windows and locks, no carpet, I would be happy. This is not to say others who like the tech are wrong, just that there are plenty other vehicles to scratch that itch. Heck, I love the fact that my 19 still has a key, not push button.

I would much rather spend my money for a stripped down vehicle with higher capability. Although each technological addition to a vehicle may not in itself add that much to the price of a vehicle, they add up and are one of the reasons we gladly continue to pay such high prices for new vehicles, (not talking about the current ridiculous market conditions).

TLDR: Plenty of market options for tech seekers, much fewer for fans of vehicles like the 4runner. Buy what you want, but please don't try to turn every vehicle into the same crossover platform with heated seats navigation etc.

FWIW a 70 series landcruiser with diesel and manual tranny make my loins froth.

Originally Posted by BorotHex

It’s way behind in most areas and honestly it seems like common sense that I don’t have enough time to argue on behalf of.

The interior is garbage. Mine pops and rattles on flat pavement, but all over the interior on bumps. My sunroof came with multiple bolts stripped in the rail mounting it to the car. Had to have the entire thing replaced, and now it pops even more. It’s just a junk interior like nothing I’ve ever seen before. Frighteningly poor engineering.

But as I said in another thread, I have been in two other Toyotas recently and they are even worse. Toyotas are just noisy and people like me think they sound like junk. I have not been in a Tundra though, so it may be better.

Originally Posted by BorotHex

It’s way behind in most areas and honestly it seems like common sense that I don’t have enough time to argue on behalf of.

The interior is garbage. Mine pops and rattles on flat pavement, but all over the interior on bumps. My sunroof came with multiple bolts stripped in the rail mounting it to the car. Had to have the entire thing replaced, and now it pops even more. It’s just a junk interior like nothing I’ve ever seen before. Frighteningly poor engineering.

But as I said in another thread, I have been in two other Toyotas recently and they are even worse. Toyotas are just noisy and people like me think they sound like junk. I have not been in a Tundra though, so it may be better.

Originally Posted by BorotHex

He’s not trying to hurt your feelings. He’s just saying the next vehicle will need to be massively upgraded. That chip on your shoulder is getting awfully heavy. Might want to address it.

I agree. The 4Runner is way, way behind other vehicles on tech, safety, and options. Toyota either needs to drop the 4Runner or upgrade it to a decent standard that compares to just the basic competitor’s vehicles. It will be very interesting to see what they do.

Originally Posted by BorotHex

Most people don’t care if the drivetrain will go 500,000 miles. They want an attractive exterior, comfortable interior, modern gadgets, good economy.

When you look at those wants, 4Runner is way behind.

I don’t question which SUV will last longest. With maintenance the 4Runner is the winner. I thought when I bought mine I’d just drive it till the wheels fall off, which is a very, very long time. But the archaic and poorly engineered interior alone has caused me to regret the purchase. That’s not even taking into consideration last in class everything else other than reliability.

If they don’t have a huge upgrade this time, they’re in trouble. I suspect based on how badass the Tundra is that Toyota gets it loud and clear. I’m hopeful.

Originally Posted by BorotHex

It’s way behind in most areas and honestly it seems like common sense that I don’t have enough time to argue on behalf of.

The interior is garbage. Mine pops and rattles on flat pavement, but all over the interior on bumps. My sunroof came with multiple bolts stripped in the rail mounting it to the car. Had to have the entire thing replaced, and now it pops even more. It’s just a junk interior like nothing I’ve ever seen before. Frighteningly poor engineering.

But as I said in another thread, I have been in two other Toyotas recently and they are even worse. Toyotas are just noisy and people like me think they sound like junk. I have not been in a Tundra though, so it may be better.

Originally Posted by Pedro367

I'd attest more of that to Jeep marketing and creating the Wrangler to be a real practical vehicle for soccer moms or the others that always wanted one, but it didn't make sense. Since the JKU, Wrangler sales have gone through the roof because of that. It became the next "cool" thing that everyone wanted to drive. You don't see famous people driving 4runners, so nobody cares. That's not Toyota's thing. It's society more than the fact that the 4Runner is outdated. Up until recently with the JL, Jeep tech was non-existent too. Now if you want it on the JL you are paying additional as nothing is standard on a Wrangler. I give so much credit to Jeep for doing what they did. Toyota SUVs in the US will never be as cool to the US population. If Jeep can sell millions of body on frame wranglers with solid axles, traditional 4WD systems, death wobble, and extremely sparse interiors than it's tough to blame the 4Runners fewer sales on that. Also, the 4.0L is fine on power. It's the transmission that needs an update and really the only thing I'd wish to change on the 4R. Jeeps with the Pentastar and the 5 speed were DOGS too until they went to the 8 speed.

In the US, practicality, reliability, etc. goes out the window for stupid expensive features or what Lebron James drives. The 4Runner is a better made vehicle than all of those that Rich listed.

And Rich, a RWD platform is about the only thing similar to those vehicles and the 4runner. Go get your Intelligent 4WD without a low range, unibody construction, independent suspension, and turbocharged crossover like everyone else with no personality and can't think for themselves and enjoy your trip down the Parkway. It's not the point of buying a 4runner and you know that. We don't want the 4Runner to change and get all those features.

Originally Posted by norutah

The Subaru ascent has a GVWR of 6001. Is that close enough to your mandatory GVWR? It has everything that a 4runner lacks and lacks everything that makes a 4runner a solid choice for some people.
Some highlights from your list above include:
Nice seats
Nice colors

Sent from my HD1925 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Bmnorm2

Me thinks Borothex=RichinRidgewood

Originally Posted by Pedro367

What is it last in class in? I actually do want to know, not trying to be a jerk. Your likeness to the interior is subjective. Personally, I love the interior in my 4R. It looks great (again, my opinion) and it has actual buttons. It's simple and that's what I like. The TRD seats are sharp looking and are comfy and it has tons of space inside. Could the stereo be better? Sure. Could the UI be better? Sure, but they upgraded that in recent years at the same time Jeep did. Those things are not really important to me and regardless that's what the aftermarket is for. I have yet to get the desire to spend the money in those areas which means it's not as bad as people on forums make it out to be.

When I had my JKU the first thing I wanted to do was upgrade the speakers as they were really that bad. A JLU Wrangler of comparable price ($43k was sticker on my ORP), so a Sport S, has so much worse "stock" components than my 4R with candles for headlights, horrible speakers, basic Uconnect, no tech at all, cloth seats etc. and is much smaller inside and not as comfortable to drive. Not to mention leaky roofs, death wobble, overall FCA quality, etc.

Rich is stirring the pot by comparing a 4R to a Lincoln or Explorer, but when you compare a 4R to it's actual competition for the price it doesn't miss the mark at all aside from the outdated 5 speed trans which, again, gives reliability by being tried and true for so long. I'm getting 17.5 MPG in my 4Runner and I got 18.5 in my JKU and a little more in my wife's grand cherokees. Not much off the mark there either, especially when you consider the 4R is much bigger inside, more practical, and 1000% more reliable. It's an easy trade off.

Originally Posted by Humble Leader

is rich a troll sometimes (Like 90% of the time): yes
do his threads generate interesting discussion and different points: yes
do said threads generate lots of posts / views: yes
will you laugh at his threads: yes

trolls play a vital role in the forum ecosystem. good trolling will generate views and create some interesting threads. interesting content keeps people coming back. just like any ecosystem, a balance is required and the trolls must be kept in check

sure people will get rustled jimmies now and then, but you can't deny, you click on every richinridgewood thread

Originally Posted by Jetboy

Sure thing. We all believe you.

Why does the Ecoboost even have a cooling system? Apparently according to the expert it doesn't need one right?

Also, what does the "Engine Overtemp" warning mean on the dash? I assumed it meant over temperature. But since we now know that it doesn't go over temperature I'm kinda at a loss for what that means. Can you help?

This one:

Edit: now the second picture is even more confusing. The new warning says over temperature in full words. But we know that can't happen. So I assume it's a very elaborate practical joke from Ford and should be ignored?

Originally Posted by 02SE

… I'm not sure who you think you are enlightening with your 'insights'. Go buy your Explorer or Aviator already.

Originally Posted by Bmnorm2

……. OP, serious question, have you looked into selling your 4runner to move to the Explorer or otherwise?

Originally Posted by Anonymous4Runner

This guy is still shitposting? I haven't been active for a little over a year and last time I engaged with this guy, he was a new member to this forum if my memory serves me correctly. Yikes.

Originally Posted by Saturnine90

This is comparing apples to oranges. Specs aside at least the 4Runner doesn’t look like ass.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by -E5J-

^^^This… This entire statement was the very thought I had, going all the way back to the silly solid front axel fascination thread and ALL the ways ‘ole Rich was schooled, lol.

Originally Posted by Baystate4Runner

So in other words - you had absolutely no idea what you were doing when you bought your 4Runner.

Happens all the time - in 2012 I bought my first sports car…after a month I realized that it only had two seats and the Ford Fusion came as a 5 seater which was more practical.
I still haven’t sold that sports car but I complain a lot about it’s missing seats and features.

Originally Posted by Jetboy

Rich is a troll. And not a very well informed one, so that's usually where we end up with him randomly choosing a lie and then finding out that it doesn't fit. Like his "must have at least 6500gvwr" requirement and then learning that his 4R is only 6300gvwr.

But, he's not totally wrong that the 4R is WAY behind on drivetrain. And sales are down because of it. I know we can see year over year sales stable or going up a little. But it's a segment where the Wrangler has increased about 5 times in sales while the 4R is about 20% above its 1990s era sales.

And the standard Toyota product frequency is 7 years. Every 4r generation since the first ran for 7 years. This one was a major facelift on the 4th gen not really a new generation. And it's run for 18 years and counting. Toyota has failed IMO. The new tundra is pretty universally seen as a let down from every review I've seen. For me it's the 2017 update that showed up in 2022? And it's really 2023 before they've seriously going to market with it.

Toyota is showing some real missteps here. Due to lack of any meaningful investment in new tech or updating it's vehicles. You can see this in other places too. The RAV4 prime? Brilliant, but they won't sell any because they won't build them. They're rebranding a BYD because they can't build an EV Corolla. They rebranded a BMW because they won't build a 2 door IS500. Toyota does a lot right in the manufacturing process side. They're falling behind in the product side across a lot of segments for lack of innovation.

Originally Posted by RichinRidgewood

So much fan boy butthurt

.

Originally Posted by Pedro367

You're on a forum for a specific vehicle and don't like it when someone defends and says they like said vehicle. Weird play.

Originally Posted by Bmnorm2

Me thinks Borothex=RichinRidgewood

Originally Posted by 02SE

I don't believe they're the same person, but they apparently do share the trait of being unable to move on.

Rich is complaining again about his 4Runner, but apparently he still has it.

Borothex stated months ago he was trading in his 4Runner the next day, but apparently HE still has his too.

I've owned vehicles I didn't like after buying them, so I sold them. I didn't obsess over them, I just moved on.

I just don't understand why that is so difficult for some people to do...

Originally Posted by RichinRidgewood

It's not overheating Einstein. It's a warning light. It will derate until the temp comes down. Thats what they did when I was there instead of blowing parts all over the highway like some other manufacturers seem to think it's ok. I would tell you what part of the engine they monitored for the algorithm but you know everything so you must know which part it is all ready.

Originally Posted by 02SE

I don't believe they're the same person, but they apparently do share the trait of being unable to move on.

Rich is complaining again about his 4Runner, but apparently he still has it.

Borothex stated months ago he was trading in his 4Runner the next day, but apparently HE still has his too.

I've owned vehicles I didn't like after buying them, so I sold them. I didn't obsess over them, I just moved on.

I just don't understand why that is so difficult for some people to do...