Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetboy
Yes. 2.0 on my Tundra. Had 2.5 RR on the 4R. Tundra 2.0 are soft. Like Cadillac ride. It's as soft as my rx350. Maybe softer.
...
It's odd if they were a lot different in valving on the 4R, but wouldn't surprise me that much.
|
Yeah, that's wild... I'm guessing you found the 2.5RRs to be good on the runner?
I can definitively say now after a few days with the TRD Pro Foxes that my old Fox 2.0s were significantly stiffer.
The TRD Pro Foxes are such a night and day difference over the 2.0s that I regret not doing this first. Of course there's no free lunch - the extra soak-up-the-bad-pavement magic in the rear comes at the expense of rebound damping... this means it does take a split second to settle over bigger bumps, but I so do not care. It's beyond worth it to trade for a ride that doesn't jitter and feel so busy over every single imperfection.
As far as roll and dive, I don't think I notice a major difference. There must be some additional given how much more compliant they are, but it's definitely not anywhere near a problem. I did some quick-ish lane change simulations at like 45mph today and was pleasantly surprised.
My only other note is that the fronts are a bit stiffer than the rear, but still noticeably softer than the 2.0s. This has me wondering how a nice set of 2.5RR Foxes would be up front.... But I need to stop chasing perfection.
Lastly, I do no miss the extra 1-1.5" of front ride height that the Fox 2.0s had out of the box. At times the truck looked carolina-squatty (negative rake) and I hated it. I'm often carrying 150lbs of music equipment in the rear so the out of the box height on the TRD Pro Foxes is perfect for level-ish.