11-04-2024, 08:56 PM
|
#16
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 929
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trainman605
My wife and I both came from Honda's, an Acura RLX and a Ridgeline. Today we are driving the 2021 Lexus RX 350 and the 2024 Gen 5 4 Runner. All have been V6's with the standard FI engines, all got very good fuel mileage and no problems whatsoever, so why does Toyota now have to put the 2.4 engines in everything, it sure wasn't to improve fuel mileage over the Honda's. If Toyota doesn't go back to V6's and Honda still builds the FI V6 I will probably return to Honda's when it comes time to replace the Toyota vehicles.
|
The 2.4's do have considerable efficiency gains over their older 3.5L and 4.0L V6's, doubly so when hybridized. They also meet modern emissions standards, which is something Toyota has to consider. The 1GR 4.0L was emissions compliant until 2026, they were not going to be able to sell it forever, and I don't think they had any more realistic bandaids available for that engine. Even if they did, EPA 17mpg combined in a midsize SUV is class lowest.
There's stuff to like about the new engines, even if you're not going to buy one. Such as torque higher than the old 5.7L V8, while getting nearly twice the MPG that V8 did. The turbo torque at altitude is also nice. The 1GR becomes a joke north of 7,000ft, and an absolute clown show past 10,000, IMO.
__________________
2023 TRD Offroad Premium
Former: 1987 SR5 w/ SAS, 1999 Limited w/ e-locker
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-05-2024, 08:04 AM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hurricane, WV
Posts: 2,470
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hurricane, WV
Posts: 2,470
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by esto70
Quentin,
A little off topic from this thread, but...I've been a 4Runner owner since 2005. I've owned a 2005 SR5, and 2010 and 2013 Limiteds. I love 4Runners and Toyota trucks in general.
I know this is sacrilege here, but in 2020 I traded in my '13 4R Limited for a new 2020 Honda Passport Elite. For those who don't know, the passport is marketed as a 2-row off-road oriented mid-size SUV. Basically, it's a Pilot for people who don't want to be seen driving a pilot. I honestly love my passport. It's SUPER quiet. I get 25-27 mpg on the highway with the stock tires and 3.5L v6. I can cram a ridiculous amount of mountain bikes and gear in that thing and road trip all summer. It's an amazing road trip vehicle.
There's a completely new passport coming out next year that I'm excited about. It's going to keep the traditional 3.5L v6 and pick up some new off road goodies. No, it's not body-on-frame. It's a crossover and not a real truck. But if you're looking for something a little more tame, road friendly, and family friendly, the passport fills that niche pretty nicely.
|
Worse than getting a crossover, I'm getting an electric crossover. Long story short, my employer subsidizes my vehicles and they have a screaming deal on electric cars at the moment. Way lower operating costs and way cheaper than what I was paying for my 4Runner. Seems like the ideal time to try it out. The lease is only for 2 years, so if it stinks, it is only for 2 years and I'll get something else. We have a hybrid crossover and a GR Corolla in the stable already, so I'm not worried about range anxiety because I'll take one of those 2 vehicles if I'm driving more than 100 miles away. After camping in the 4Runner again this past weekend, I am worried about losing the OK-at-everythingness of the 4Runner.
__________________
2023 GR Corolla ('10, '16, and '23 4Runners in the past)
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-03-2024, 08:49 PM
|
#18
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 80
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trainman605
It's going to be interesting to see how the 2.4 Turbos, new transmissions, and Hybrids work out in the new vehicles, 4-Runner and Land Cruiser. I say this because the new Tacoma's are having several problems with the new vehicles and they are not selling, cost is also a big factor as well as taking the V6 and 5-spd trans out of vehicles that have proven themselves over the past 15-20 years. Remember these two vehicles sold because of the reliability and high mileage that these vehicles were known for, now Toyota has thrown monkey a wrench into their new models and so far there have been problems with these new vehicles. For those of you who watch "The Car Care Nut" on YouTube he does go into the new Turbo engines longevity and repair cost is going to much higher than the old V6 engines. For wife and me (2022 Lexus RX 350 and 2024 Toyota 4-Runner) we are set for the future, so Turbos and 4-cylinder engine are out for the time being, but when the time comes, I hope this engine thing has worked itself out. is ticking.
|
This is likely area dependent. Colorado is already filled with 4th gen Tacomas. Anecdotally, i've seen more 4th gen Tacomas than any of the competitors combined which is surprising given the 4th gen barely went on sale.
Went skiing at Copper mountain last week and saw 4 of the new Tacomas in just one of the lots.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-03-2024, 08:51 PM
|
#19
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 80
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatoneguy
The 2.4's do have considerable efficiency gains over their older 3.5L and 4.0L V6's, doubly so when hybridized. They also meet modern emissions standards, which is something Toyota has to consider. The 1GR 4.0L was emissions compliant until 2026, they were not going to be able to sell it forever, and I don't think they had any more realistic bandaids available for that engine. Even if they did, EPA 17mpg combined in a midsize SUV is class lowest.
There's stuff to like about the new engines, even if you're not going to buy one. Such as torque higher than the old 5.7L V8, while getting nearly twice the MPG that V8 did. The turbo torque at altitude is also nice. The 1GR becomes a joke north of 7,000ft, and an absolute clown show past 10,000, IMO.
|
I agree with you. Also, in some ways the inline4 turbo is actually a simpler design than past V8s.
Half the heads, half the cams, half the gaskets, half the manifolds. Fewer valves, simpler timing chain, etc etc.
My main wish is that Toyota went with a straight six for their larger vehicles. A V6TT retains all the bad parts of the V style engine and adds complexity. Inline engines are simple by design.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-04-2024, 12:26 PM
|
#20
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 929
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KimchiJae
I agree with you. Also, in some ways the inline4 turbo is actually a simpler design than past V8s.
Half the heads, half the cams, half the gaskets, half the manifolds. Fewer valves, simpler timing chain, etc etc.
My main wish is that Toyota went with a straight six for their larger vehicles. A V6TT retains all the bad parts of the V style engine and adds complexity. Inline engines are simple by design.
|
Yes, that would've been nice. Since the twin turbo V6 is only going in longitudinal RWD truck applications, there's really no reason it couldn't have been a straight six. Variants of the turbo four in the smaller trucks also go into transverse-mounted front wheel drive applications in plenty of lighter duty vehicles.
Very good point about the simplicity argument. Four-cam V6's are not the simplest thing ever, especially when turbocharged on top, especially when hybridized on top.
I'm hip, I'm modern, I'm a fan of the newer technologies..... except that 10-speed transmissions make me hesitate. The 8-speed in the Tacoma/4Runner give me comparatively no anxiety, but I seriously don't want to own a 10-speed like the Tundra/Sequoia/GX get.
The hybrid torque would be awesome offroad, but I don't feel I drive enough miles to care much about having the hybrid system. My wishlist item would be a Land Cruiser 250 offered without the hybrid, just turbo four, but I don't expect that to happen
__________________
2023 TRD Offroad Premium
Former: 1987 SR5 w/ SAS, 1999 Limited w/ e-locker
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
12-05-2024, 10:56 AM
|
#21
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 200
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 200
|
I was in Colorado last year and I know where all the old Chevy and GMC Blazers and Jimmys went from the 70's and 80's, you will find them there. It tells you why the older Tacoma's are there too, they buy vehicles that can stand the test of time. I expect you will find all the older 4 Runners there someday, if not already there.
__________________
2024 4 Runner Premium TRD Off Road
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|