Quote:
Originally Posted by rook
When you mention mileage, do you mean mpg or treadwear. If the price difference is 40/tire, go with the No's. The Blizz high traction compound only comprises 2/3 of the tread depth.
|
I think the prices will be similar if I can find anyone actually selling the tires.
I meant MPG. The Hakkas have a low rolling resistance compound.
The Hakka's have 12/32's tread depth.
The Blizzaks 14/32s and the special compound for only 55% of the tread depth. That means it has it until 6.3/32s are left and you'd better replace your snows at 6/32s anyways.
Blizzaks I can get in 245/70, 245/75, 255/70, 265/70, and 265/65. I think the Nokians only come in 265/65 according to the Nokian website, but I've seen foreign sites with other sizes listed.
I wonder if I should go for the skinnier tires if I decide on Blizzak... might make better mpg and traction, right?
I've heard blizzaks suck in slush... is that true?