10-31-2015, 06:53 AM
|
#1
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
Real World MPG
I don't know how important MPG is to other generation 4Runners, but in the 5th Gen section there are countless threads about this very subject. The problem is not many people know the huge variation in mpg you can get based on driving habits and environmental factors! For example, did you know your fuel could have a power density difference by as much as 4%? That would be almost 1 mpg difference on a 20 mpg vehicle from the same gas from the same station! Anyway, for those of you that really care about the efficiency of your vehicle read this Real MPG Part 2: It?s Report Card Time - Motor Trend article on how they test it right.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-31-2015, 10:06 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 359
Real Name: Richard
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 359
Real Name: Richard
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1engineer
I don't know how important MPG is to other generation 4Runners, but in the 5th Gen section there are countless threads about this very subject. The problem is not many people know the huge variation in mpg you can get based on driving habits and environmental factors! For example, did you know your fuel could have a power density difference by as much as 4%? That would be almost 1 mpg difference on a 20 mpg vehicle from the same gas from the same station! Anyway, for those of you that really care about the efficiency of your vehicle read this Real MPG Part 2: It?s Report Card Time - Motor Trend article on how they test it right.
|
Good read. I can get great mileage variances on my 2012 Expedition with a 5.4L engine. One particular brand of gasoline gets better MPG than the other.
My cumulative average on the 2015 TP Is about 18.3 with less than 3K miles. This is good because I could never get better than 14.5 in the 2005 F150
77
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-31-2015, 10:09 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgetown, TX
Posts: 1,244
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgetown, TX
Posts: 1,244
|
If 1mpg bothers your budget or your psyche you should quit checking it or redo your budget. Assuming you can use the complete 18gal in the tank, the difference between 15 and 16mpg is 18 miles. That won't even get me to the office. That's like a $1.25 a week or $65/yr. I could drink one 12pk a week less and save over $600/yr.
__________________
1989 Toyota 4runner
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-31-2015, 11:38 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern Appalachian Mountains
Age: 61
Posts: 9,941
Real Name: Greg
|
Understood. You do realize that mpg threads are some of the most popular in every subforum though. I just wanted to post that so hopefully people will realize finding an average mpg for a vehicle is not as easy as driving to the beach and checking their mpg one time. The more you know lol.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-01-2015, 08:12 AM
|
#5
|
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utard
Posts: 12,985
Real Name: Kevin
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utard
Posts: 12,985
Real Name: Kevin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77Bronc
Good read. I can get great mileage variances on my 2012 Expedition with a 5.4L engine. One particular brand of gasoline gets better MPG than the other.
My cumulative average on the 2015 TP Is about 18.3 with less than 3K miles. This is good because I could never get better than 14.5 in the 2005 F150
77
|
I have seen as good as 17.5mpg with the 5.4 in my '01 F150, that was summer gas on stock tires and me driving like grandpa. Right now I'm getting more like 13.
__________________
.
'My needle always settles between west and southwest. The future lies that way to me, and the earth seems more unexhausted and richer on that side.' - Thoreau, sort of.
The Grey Bastard, 1985 4Runner, driveway ornament.
Utah DesertRunners T4R, for all things wheeling and 4Runner in Utah.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-01-2015, 10:05 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spencer, WV
Age: 33
Posts: 150
Real Name: Erin
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spencer, WV
Age: 33
Posts: 150
Real Name: Erin
|
My '67 caddy averaged 16 on the hwy, I was pleased. However even more so with a carb'd vehicle it depends on your foot. I'd think that's the direct cause and effect, no? LoL And yeah I suppose gas too. Higher octane fuel sure seems to give more get up 'n go, but I also read too much of the same is bad too (Chevron all the time, etc) because their additives start to build up. So switching around but never getting the cheapest gas seems to work well.
My fiance gets awful mpg in his '96 Dodge ram because he's a lead foot.
I average 22-23 mpg hwy in my Toyo with 5.29s and 33 M/Ts. Love that OD button. Haven't paid attention in town because I don't fill up often.
My 1st gen spoiled me rotten <3
__________________
'87 4Runner- Reman 22RE auto, custom exhaust, 4" skyjacker soft springs out back with 3" combined spacer/t-bar lift up front, 5.29s w/ rear Grizzly locker, skinny BFG 33s and Bilsteins all around
'88 Chevy 1 ton dually crewcab- Rebuilt 454, cowl induction hood
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-01-2015, 10:34 AM
|
#7
|
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utard
Posts: 12,985
Real Name: Kevin
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utard
Posts: 12,985
Real Name: Kevin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Girl
Higher octane fuel sure seems to give more get up 'n go,
|
This is a really pervasive myth, and not really true.
When you hear people talk about pinging or knock, they're talking about the air fuel mix in the cylinder igniting before the spark plug fires due to compression from the closing piston. The octane rating of gasoline is just a measure of the gasoline's ability to take that compression without spontaneously igniting, nothing more. It does not indicate any greater energy potential than lower octane gas.
To confuse the matter though, higher octane does let a motor run higher compressions in the combustion chamber, and more compression means more bang when it does ignite. But that's the motor, not the gas, and if your motor is not built and/or tuned to take advantage of that higher octane fuel then paying for the higher octane is just throwing your money away.
__________________
.
'My needle always settles between west and southwest. The future lies that way to me, and the earth seems more unexhausted and richer on that side.' - Thoreau, sort of.
The Grey Bastard, 1985 4Runner, driveway ornament.
Utah DesertRunners T4R, for all things wheeling and 4Runner in Utah.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-04-2015, 01:02 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spencer, WV
Age: 33
Posts: 150
Real Name: Erin
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spencer, WV
Age: 33
Posts: 150
Real Name: Erin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KidVermicious
This is a really pervasive myth, and not really true.
When you hear people talk about pinging or knock, they're talking about the air fuel mix in the cylinder igniting before the spark plug fires due to compression from the closing piston. The octane rating of gasoline is just a measure of the gasoline's ability to take that compression without spontaneously igniting, nothing more. It does not indicate any greater energy potential than lower octane gas.
To confuse the matter though, higher octane does let a motor run higher compressions in the combustion chamber, and more compression means more bang when it does ignite. But that's the motor, not the gas, and if your motor is not built and/or tuned to take advantage of that higher octane fuel then paying for the higher octane is just throwing your money away.
|
Word! My Caddy's big block is a high compression motor (Forgot comp test numbers but somewhere around 10:1.. Gawd I miss that power, she's still in NM) so she complains when I don't feed her premium, but hey as long as gas is below 2 bucks a gal why not burn out that carbon with some high octane once in a while in our daily drivers?
You're right though, that premium doesn't make for better mpg.
But it may make for a cleaner healthier running engine... which in turn.. makes for better mpg?
__________________
'87 4Runner- Reman 22RE auto, custom exhaust, 4" skyjacker soft springs out back with 3" combined spacer/t-bar lift up front, 5.29s w/ rear Grizzly locker, skinny BFG 33s and Bilsteins all around
'88 Chevy 1 ton dually crewcab- Rebuilt 454, cowl induction hood
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-04-2015, 01:28 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Boulder-ish, Colorado
Posts: 1,181
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Boulder-ish, Colorado
Posts: 1,181
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Girl
But it may make for a cleaner healthier running engine... which in turn.. makes for better mpg?
|
Nope. Octane rating has nothing to do with that at all. Sounds like you're just buying into the snake oil that is the "ultra super premium patented" detergent blends they advertise.
__________________
2000 SR5 Sport - 4EAT and E-locker, King 2.5s, EimKeith PCK, SPC UCAs, 33" KO2s on Black Rhino Boxer gloss gold 17x8.5, Savage/Lotus skids, 4xInnovations front bumper/sliders, Shrockworks bumper & tire carrier, Lil Skip Gas Tank Skid, Magnaflow Overland cat back
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-04-2015, 01:58 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: High Rockies
Posts: 1,105
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: High Rockies
Posts: 1,105
|
Interesting article. Made me think of something I learned about a few years ago: Fuel temperature affects the volume you actually pay for. Maybe a small amount, but significant enough that companies have designed Automatic Temperature Compensation pumps.
http://www.fairbanksglobal.com/fuel-...re-report.html
__________________
'02 SR5
"Gas pedal's on the right.'
~Logan
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-04-2015, 02:39 PM
|
#11
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 985
Real Name: Matt
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 985
Real Name: Matt
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Girl
Word! My Caddy's big block is a high compression motor (Forgot comp test numbers but somewhere around 10:1.. Gawd I miss that power, she's still in NM) so she complains when I don't feed her premium, but hey as long as gas is below 2 bucks a gal why not burn out that carbon with some high octane once in a while in our daily drivers?
You're right though, that premium doesn't make for better mpg.
But it may make for a cleaner healthier running engine... which in turn.. makes for better mpg?
|
There's more to it than just compression ratio. The 4runner's 4.0L is 10.4:1, and Mazda's Skyactive engines have a ratio of 14:1 on regular fuel! It sounds like they achieve that by taking measures to cool the combustion chamber between cycles.
Skyactive 2 is rumored to have a compression ratio of 18:1, and it sounds like they will be basically diesel engines that run on regular gasoline. They are supposed to be ready by 2020.
DailyTech - Mazda Expects 30 Percent Enhanced Fuel Economy with Skyactiv 2 Engines Come 2020
__________________
2007 V8 Limited 4WD
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-04-2015, 04:56 PM
|
#12
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 52
Real Name: Derek
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 52
Real Name: Derek
|
I've found Sam's Club fuel to run the most consistent, at least in my turbo cars. Never had problems. I dont swear by it, Im not bent for a brand, but running the same grade fuel from different stations, theirs knocked the least if at all. 4runner is more forgiving it seems, but its still new
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-04-2015, 05:00 PM
|
#13
|
|
Elite Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Diego
Age: 41
Posts: 11,437
Real Name: Instagram: briansd_97r
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Diego
Age: 41
Posts: 11,437
Real Name: Instagram: briansd_97r
|
I recently did a longer trip to a nearby city and back. I filled up that morning and then drove until the tank was down towards E. I filled up 15.5 gallons and after calculating the mileage plus the tire offset I ended up with 16.7 MPG.
I was elated. Not bad for 240,000 miles on an engine EPA rated @ 15/18 MPG on a truck with a lift kit, bumpers, sliders and 33" tires.
16.7 MPG ..... WHOOOOOOOOHOOOOO! VICTORY!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Those he commands move only in command, Nothing in love. Now does he feel his title, Hang loose about him, like a giant’s robe, Upon a dwarfish treasonous thief.
Last edited by BrianSD_42; 11-04-2015 at 05:02 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-04-2015, 06:56 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,702
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,702
|
Just what we need....another MPG thread.
__________________
2000 4Runner Limited 4WD Built. Totaled
2014 4Runner Trail Premium Not Built.
2017 Tacoma DBLCB TRD OR
The Builds
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
11-05-2015, 11:50 AM
|
#15
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: AZ
Posts: 74
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: AZ
Posts: 74
|
Driving style is the biggest factor. 10-15% boost from a lead foot to light.
__________________
2015 TE w/KDSS. 265/70-17 LTC BFG KO2
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|