02-05-2020, 08:06 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
Solid Front Axle Fascination (SFAF): Help Me Understand
Solid front axles. Why would anyone want a solid axle on anything except maybe on an over the road tractor trailer combination?
My experience with them has been I dont ever want one anywhere and that is one of the biggest drawbacks on the 4Runner for me.
Here is a good summary of why 4 Wheel Independent Suspension is so much better....
5 Reasons Why Your Solid-Axle Rig Is Obsolete | DrivingLine
Last edited by RichinRidgewood; 02-05-2020 at 08:58 AM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 10:12 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: MN
Posts: 264
Real Name: Newell
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: MN
Posts: 264
Real Name: Newell
|
Unless your IFS has a locker the solid axle is slightly more capable in terms of power. Also slightly less prone to failure. At the same time they can be slightly restrictive due to travel limitations.
Not sure why you mention that being a drawback for the 4runner though, since all models have an independent front setup..
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 10:19 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanRunner651
Unless your IFS has a locker the solid axle is slightly more capable in terms of power. Also slightly less prone to failure. At the same time they can be slightly restrictive due to travel limitations.
Not sure why you mention that being a drawback for the 4runner though, since all models have an independent front setup..
|
Yes Im aware the front suspension is independent and rear is not on 4Runner. I don't care for the solid rear on the 4Runner.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 10:21 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kansas
Age: 28
Posts: 4,304
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kansas
Age: 28
Posts: 4,304
|
Sometimes having the two tires connected with a solid axle can be an advantage.
When crawling over rocks where IFS might lift a tire going up a ledge because there is no weight on the front end, a solid axle will use the force pushing up on the tire in contact with the ground and direct it to pushing the other tire down out of the air.
You watch the KOH unlimited class and quite a few are now running IFS suspension, if not also IRS. It can be very strong when done right but sometimes its not worth the effort and a solid axle is pretty easy to swap in comparison to redesigning IFS.
But I have a feeling you're talking road manners and not offroad ability.
__________________
2005 4R Sport 4WD "The last of the V8s!" - Custom TIG'd SS Dual Exhaust - King 2.5" +2 LT. - ARB Front & Rear - 37's - Dana 60 - Build Thread
2005 Tundra 2WD Regular Cab V8 - Chopped Frame - Short Bed Swap
1977 Celica Liftback - LFX Swap - Build Thread
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 10:39 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inv4drZm
... a solid axle is pretty easy to swap in comparison to redesigning IFS.
|
I can see this being an advantage on a budget weekend warrior type vehicle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inv4drZm
But I have a feeling you're talking road manners and not offroad ability.
|
I would include on-road and off-road. Having all 4 corners independent is the best for both. Solid or beam axles for nostalgia or budget rides but certainly not on a newly designed vehicle.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 10:59 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,599
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,599
|
A few possible pluses for solid rear axle:
More robust and durable, fewer things to go wrong.
Fewer components overall.
No need for rear alignments - tire wear is always even.
I understand the positives in favor of independent suspension. Being an older guy, I also appreciate a simple design where a complex one won't add much to my life. I can relax knowing that my rear axle will outlive the vehicle, if it comes to that.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 11:01 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: denver
Posts: 3,010
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: denver
Posts: 3,010
|
I like the solid rear in the 4runner. Solid suspensions aré remarkably stronger then ifs with less components to fail. Ifs vehicles like Ford expedition, Lincoln navigator or a suburu infact other uni body awd vehicles do well on forest service roads and drive like a cars on the street. Something for you to look into.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 11:05 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,891
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,891
|
Solid axles are still popular because they have been around forever and are very good at what they do.
The vast majority of the motoring public have no idea what a good handling vehicle feels like and they simply don't care about the small handling characteristic differences between the two designs. Plus, there absolutely nothing around to do a perfect comparison. There's no IRS 4Runner to compare against a solid rear axle 4Runner, so you either accept and like the way it drives, or you don't.
The only vehicle I have experience with regarding IFS and SFA is the 100 series Landcruiser in Australia. It was available with both, depending on what trim you wanted. I drove both a 105 series with the 4.2 straight six and solid front axle and a 100 series 4.2 TD Sahara with IFS extensively offroad. They were both awesome, but I destroyed 4 cv axles on the IFS rig. So for durability and dependability in rough conditions, my experience as shown the solid axle was far superior. Has independent suspension improved since then? Maybe, but it’s going to take years to prove that, and in the meantime we’re going to continue seeing cv axles explode far more often than solid axles breaking.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 11:17 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spartacus
I like the solid rear in the 4runner. Solid suspensions aré remarkably stronger then ifs with less components to fail. Ifs vehicles like Ford expedition, Lincoln navigator or a suburu infact other uni body awd vehicles do well on forest service roads and drive like a cars on the street. Something for you to look into.
|
I can't even imagine buying a Ford, GM, Chrysler again. Not a fan of belt drives like the Subarus have or the "quality" level of their parts that I've seen.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 11:25 AM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kansas
Age: 28
Posts: 4,304
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kansas
Age: 28
Posts: 4,304
|
Tell a consumer they need to do rear alignments, replace rear axle shafts, and up the cost of the vehicle by a couple thousand; they'll be buying a different brand.
I would imagine leaf springs are a cheap and easy way to spring and locate the axle.
That and you don't need a subframe to hold the suspension arms. And ground clearance is inherently there.
__________________
2005 4R Sport 4WD "The last of the V8s!" - Custom TIG'd SS Dual Exhaust - King 2.5" +2 LT. - ARB Front & Rear - 37's - Dana 60 - Build Thread
2005 Tundra 2WD Regular Cab V8 - Chopped Frame - Short Bed Swap
1977 Celica Liftback - LFX Swap - Build Thread
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 11:40 AM
|
#11
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Lakebay, WA
Posts: 512
Real Name: Reinout
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Lakebay, WA
Posts: 512
Real Name: Reinout
|
I really wanted to chime in on this and really can't help myself: I can't however speak to what is "better" or "worse".
It really comes down to the end user and what/why they choose a specific suspension setup and I'm not going to go into IFS, Solid axle, or going into horst links (i'm mixing in MTB terms now), beam axles etc.
They all have their place and purposes and it is 100% opinion and an article titled "5 Reasons why your solid-axle rig is obsolete" is completely BOGUS. The article should have been titled "5 reasons why your solid-axle rig MAY BE obsolete (for your purposes)".
__________________
1997 4Runner SR5- ~376k Miles and counting - 5 Speed E-Locker
2007 4Runner Limited V6- 165k Miles - Automatic - Brake Controller
2011 VW JSW TDI- 130k Miles - 6 Speed - Air Lift 1000
2006 Scamp trailer 16'
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 12:05 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: North of Dallas
Posts: 1,664
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inv4drZm
Tell a consumer they need to do rear alignments, replace rear axle shafts, and up the cost of the vehicle by a couple thousand; they'll be buying a different brand.
I would imagine leaf springs are a cheap and easy way to spring and locate the axle.
That and you don't need a subframe to hold the suspension arms. And ground clearance is inherently there.
|
I can't even remember how many leaf springs I had to replace on my Chevrolets and Pontiacs. They didn't last very long. It was often.
It seemed like I needed front end suspension parts and a front end alignment every year and that was with 60-70 series tires too.
I have done maybe 2 - four wheel alignments on my 14 year old 180k MB C-class (IFS/IRS). I haven't had to replace any drive shafts (knock wood). I did have a worn front link about 100k miles ago
Point being if the IFS/IRS is designed right you wont need alignments and parts any more than with a solid.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 12:14 PM
|
#13
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: EAST TENNESSEE
Posts: 354
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: EAST TENNESSEE
Posts: 354
|
So, why don't you jump over to the Jeep forums and post the same question?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 12:29 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: MN
Posts: 264
Real Name: Newell
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: MN
Posts: 264
Real Name: Newell
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichinRidgewood
I don't care for the solid rear on the 4Runner.
|
Solid rear enables more power while saving gas mileage with the ability to cycle between AWD/4W & 2WD. If it were an independent rear it would be AWD full time like the V8s which is not necessary for a lot of people.
Sounds like you need to ditch the 4runner and get a RAV4..
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
02-05-2020, 12:31 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,599
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,599
|
I don’t have time to research it all, but I think the vast majority of B-O-F 4WD vehicles out there utilize a solid rear axle. I believe the reason for that is durability rather than cost. Even the expensive MB G Class uses solid rear. I think the Ford Expedition/Navigator vehicles are IRS, but I’ve never seen one set up for off-roading.
So to me, the abundance of solid axles in the making of trucks, plus the fact that serious off-roaders (I’m not one) overwhelmingly prefer solid axles on the trail, is really all the research I need to do. Again, this is because priority one for me is durability.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|