View Poll Results: (Overall) Best tire width?
|
255
|
|
11 |
7.24% |
|
265
|
|
56 |
36.84% |
|
275
|
|
30 |
19.74% |
|
285
|
|
55 |
36.18% |
|
10-02-2011, 09:45 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
Best overall offroad tire width
Ok, obviously there will be some different opinions on this, so I'm including a poll to keep things at least somewhat to the point. (I'm limiting the poll options to the sizes most common to our runners.)
I'm also going to point out that we're talking about overall offroading performance. If someone was ONLY going to be doing rock-crawling or mudding, this might be a very different conversation.
Finally, for the purposes of this discussion, let's assume the driver is airing down appropriately to get the most out of whatever size they have.
All that said, what is the best tire width for overall, general offroading?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-03-2011, 01:46 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Desert Southwest
Age: 41
Posts: 507
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Desert Southwest
Age: 41
Posts: 507
|
I would also note, what kind of terrain will you see?
__________________
2008 SR5 4x4 V6 Salsa Red Pearl w/Taupe Interior
Mods: OW 2.0", LR UCA's, 285/70R17 Cooper STT Pro's w/Spidertrax 1.25" Spacer, DirtyDeeds Muffler, SpeedoHealer
Audio: Eclipse HU CD8445, Polk Audio db6501 6.5" Components, Polk Audio db351 3.5" in factory tweeter location, 2 Audiobahn 10" Subs @ 1200W
"I'm an AMERICAN by birth and a VETERAN by choice"
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-03-2011, 10:53 AM
|
#3
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chayos00
I would also note, what kind of terrain will you see?
|
I'm really talking about general use. I wanted to avoid application-specific discussions to focus on a width that would be good for diverse use.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-03-2011, 01:23 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 150
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 150
|
I said 265 because its not too big and not to small.. you can get through Sandy areas, snowy areas, and they work just as good as any other size offroad to an extent... Its also a standard size on 60% of trucks in the US..
__________________
95 Toyota 4runner SR5 3.0 Rebuilt Heads -Toy
Lc Coils-Rear.. BJ Spacers-Front.. 20" Extended brake line in rear and Skyjacker shocks..
305/70R16 Dunlop Mud Rovers Crome Steelies W/ Spidertrax wheelspacers
Last edited by SjamesT4R; 10-04-2011 at 08:29 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-03-2011, 01:48 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
The overall diameter of the tire is where you will notice a difference when wheeling. A 15" rock may be hard for a 265-70r16 (30" tire) to get over since its going to contact the tire at its halfway mark. ANd on the same note a 35" tire could easily roll over that since its going to contact on the angled portion of the tire tread. 255's are about the same as 285's etc with the only exception being really soft sand or snow where more width will help you float
Just my 2C
__________________
check out my build thread My Build
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-03-2011, 04:49 PM
|
#6
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
Well it looked like 285 was going to take it as first... but now it looks like 265 has made a comeback! Would anyone who voted 265 care to explain their reasoning?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-03-2011, 05:13 PM
|
#7
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 7,389
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 7,389
|
I think for my close to stock 4Runner the 265 works best overall if you include on road use especially with winter driving since they aren't too wide to incur big issues with hydroplaning but not too skinny they comprimise dry grip on the street.
__________________
2010 Lexus RX350
'99 4RUNNER Highlander SR5 4wd *Sold
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-03-2011, 05:32 PM
|
#8
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonMAIDEN
I think for my close to stock 4Runner the 265 works best overall if you include on road use especially with winter driving since they aren't too wide to incur big issues with hydroplaning but not too skinny they comprimise dry grip on the street.
|
Good point, if we're talking about overall use, we certainly should take water and snow into the equation... both on AND off road.
To that end, wouldn't a wider tire be better for off-road snow? If a 285 is a little too wide for wet or snowy highway conditions (and 285 owners feel free to chime in here if it's now), would 275 be a good compromise?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-04-2011, 12:02 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
you talking about 1 cm (.39 inches) of difference in width. THis width is measured at the widest point of the tire, Which happens to be the sidewall. Some tires have a wider tread than others in the same size. I would say there is about an inch of actual tread width variation between different brands on models in the same size.
You wont notice 1 cm of difference in snow or sand or what ever. You may notice a 3 cm (EDIT: thanks blcktpgsr) difference 255 to 285
You need to check the treadwidth on the tires before you buy
__________________
check out my build thread My Build
Last edited by J-money$$$; 10-04-2011 at 01:12 AM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-04-2011, 01:04 AM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 2,019
Real Name: Ervin
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 2,019
Real Name: Ervin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-money$$$
You wont notice 1 cm of difference in snow or sand or what ever. You may notice a 30 cm difference 255 to 285
|
Not to worry,,J-money meant 3 cm
__________________
97 4Runner SR5 TRDSC URD Yukon Camburg Toytec Trekmaster 4Crawler SonoranSteel Level8 Nitto SavageOff-Road ARB Smittybilt MasterPull Powertank SpiderTrax B&M Jaos Gobi Flowmaster Cobra Firestik Alpine CompuStar Hella PIAA RigidIndustries WeatherTech
my build http://www.toyota-4runner.org/3rd-ge...formation.html July 2012 T4RoTM / 2012 T4RoTY
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-04-2011, 01:11 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blcktpgsr
Not to worry,,J-money meant 3 cm
|
Yeah i did LOL Im fried on math at the moment. Too much physics & calculus in my life right now.
__________________
check out my build thread My Build
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-04-2011, 10:41 AM
|
#12
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
Well I was worried that the poll results might suggest there is no consensus... but maybe the consensus simply is that, as long as it's within a general range (265-285), the exact width doesn't matter. Perhaps it's more about finding a tire in that range for a good price, that gets you the height and tread that you want.
Anyone else conclude differently?
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-04-2011, 04:51 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 858
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 858
|
The more appropriate question should be:
"What is the best aspect ratio for general off roading?"
The answer is 75. It is the best overall mix, and performs adequately in all categories.
So if you want 33-ish tall tires, then go for 285/75/R16. If you want a tall 31 / short 32 go for 265/75/R16.
Personally, I run 255/85/R16s on my 4Runner. I love the tire size, but I picked it to suit my driving habits.
You want to make your "requirements" based on what you drive most often, then develop coping strategies for the stuff that you drive less often.
What types of terrain do you plan to traverse regularly?
Last edited by Mr. Leary; 10-04-2011 at 05:08 PM.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-04-2011, 07:37 PM
|
#14
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Leary
The more appropriate question should be:
"What is the best aspect ratio for general off roading?"
The answer is 75. It is the best overall mix, and performs adequately in all categories.
So if you want 33-ish tall tires, then go for 285/75/R16. If you want a tall 31 / short 32 go for 265/75/R16.
Personally, I run 255/85/R16s on my 4Runner. I love the tire size, but I picked it to suit my driving habits.
You want to make your "requirements" based on what you drive most often, then develop coping strategies for the stuff that you drive less often.
What types of terrain do you plan to traverse regularly?
|
Isn't that a 30" tire?
Anyway, the rockies offer a little bit of everything, although my #1 priority is to get through most trails, even if it means skipping some of the harder obstacles. That means being able to handle climbs over moderate rock and loose gravel. Of course, it's Colorado, so I'm also concerned about snow and ice, both on and off road.
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
10-04-2011, 11:45 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,898
|
A 285/75r16 is a 33
Do the math if you want . 285mm wide. (75% of 285)(x2)+16" Its technically 32.8"
__________________
check out my build thread My Build
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|