G. Zimmerman

Also, he weighed 200lbs and trained MMA 3 times a week before Martin beat his ass.
Click to expand...

This is super misleading. So what if he weighed 190-200lbs. 160 vs 190 can be a fair fight, hardly what I would dominating stats.
 
BrianSD_42 said:
This is super misleading. So what if he weighed 190-200lbs. 160 vs 190 can be a fair fight, hardly what I would dominating stats.
Click to expand...

any weight difference is a fair fight unless one person has a weapon and the other doesn't, or if one person is not watching.

Im 5'6 150, never fought anyone my size or smaller.
 
RunninInGA said:
Nice way to manipulate the figures there, Brian.:doh:
Click to expand...

From what I read Z weighed ~ 200 lbs and T weighed ~ 160.

How would Z even know Ts weight anyways since it was dark, raining and T was wearing a hoodie. It is doubtful that Z had any strong knowledge of Ts weight.
 
...too far?
:behindsofa:
PS I didn't make this


Pskzowl.png
 
Anyone up for some trolling?

George Zimmerman: DOJ solicits help from civil rights leaders in Zimmerman investigation - Orlando Sentinel

George Zimmerman trial coverage
July 16, 2013|By Scott Powers, Orlando Sentinel

The U.S. Department of Justice on Monday afternoon appealed to civil rights groups and community leaders, nationally and in Sanford, for help investigating whether a federal criminal case might be brought against George Zimmerman for the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, one advocate said.

The DOJ has also set up a public email address to take in tips on its civil rights investigation.

Barbara Arnwine, president and executive director the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law – who earlier in the day joined calls for federal civil rights charges against Zimmerman, said that later in the afternoon, she joined a U.S. Department of Justice conference call to discuss the prospects.

“They were calling on us to actively refer anyone who had any information,” that might build a case against Zimmerman for either a civil rights violation or a hate crime, Arnwine said. “They said they would very aggressively investigate this case.”

Arnwine said the call was convened at about 3:30 p.m. by Tom Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice, and included representatives from the FBI, and several federal prosecutors, she said. DOJ officials also said they would open a public email address so people could send in tips on the case.

That email address, which is now in operation, is [CENSORED BY RunninInGA].

In addition to Arnwine’s group, Sherrilyn Ifill, President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; Laura Murphy, Washington Chapter head of the ACLU; and several national, Florida and Sanford-based “human relations” groups participated, Arnwine said.

During the call, DOJ officials announced they had set up a way for people to send email tips that could help aid in their investigation. The email address will be operational later this week.

Also Monday, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said a speech at the social action luncheon of the Delta Sigma Theta sorority, that he shares concerns about “the tragic, unnecessary shooting death” of Trayvon Martin last year, and he vowed to pursue a federal investigation into the matter, the Washington Post reported.

Holder pledged that the Justice Department would work to “alleviate tensions, address community concerns and promote healing” in response to the case.
Click to expand...
 
RunninInGA said:
George Zimmerman: DOJ solicits help from civil rights leaders in Zimmerman investigation - Orlando Sentinel
Click to expand...

Dude, it seems like the DOJ and civil rights leaders are desperate to prove guilt after he has been found innocent in a court of law.

How is this Constitutional, or does the Bill of Rights have no meaning under the reign of Barack I?

Fifth Amendment, you know, the Bill of rights? Constitution? Wasn't Obama a Constitutional lawyer/scholar, whatever?

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

I've included the text, in case Barry and Holder get amnesia.
 
LandCruiser said:
Dude, it seems like the DOJ and civil rights leaders are desperate to prove guilt after he has been found innocent in a court of law.

How is this Constitutional, or does the Bill of Rights have no meaning under the reign of Barack I?

Fifth Amendment, you know, the Bill of rights? Constitution? Wasn't Obama a Constitutional lawyer/scholar, whatever?

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

I've included the text, in case Barry and Holder get amnesia.
Click to expand...

I think it's all for show - just because people are screaming for it, DOJ is saying they're "looking into" the possibility.

If they were actually going to charge him with a federal crime, they would have done so already.

As it is, DOJ has an internal guideline called the Petit Policy. It means that they won't charge someone with a federal crime if a similar state or local charge is already brought. And stranger things have happened, but I doubt DOJ would go after someone who was already acquitted on the state level - not unless there was a mistrial, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 382 (members: 5, guests: 377)

Forum statistics

Threads
278,239
Messages
3,553,623
Members
247,908
Latest member
Trdoffroad916

Share this page

Trending content

Back
Top