Toyota 4Runner Forum - Largest 4Runner Forum

Toyota 4Runner Forum - Largest 4Runner Forum (https://www.toyota-4runner.org/)
-   4th Gen T4Rs (https://www.toyota-4runner.org/4th-gen-t4rs/)
-   -   Why is V8 Full Time AWD? (https://www.toyota-4runner.org/4th-gen-t4rs/126257-why-v8-full-time-awd.html)

DaveK22 10-13-2012 09:22 AM

Why is V8 Full Time AWD?
 
I have been shopping for a 4th Gen for a few months now. Not in a hurry so taking my time till I find the right one.

I have ruled out the V8 mainly because I don't like the idea of full time AWD. Why did Toyota do that? Wouldn't gas mileage be much better if you could turn it off...like the the V6?

Any V8 owners agree that they would like the option to go RWD? Also, I have read a few posts saying the mpg isn't that much different...maybe so but just hard to fathom how that can be.

NJshadow93 10-13-2012 10:10 AM

I prefer full time 4WD. I would chew through tires if I could put my V8 in 2WD with all the torque. But I think Toyota did it for towing purposes. As for gas mileage, the decrease in gas mileage is mainly from the weight of the 4WD system. V6 owners don't report much of a difference when driving in 4WD vs 2WD.

EDIT: Fixed so it would make sense. Attempted using the browser on my phone to type the original one lol

Synister 10-13-2012 10:36 AM

NJshadow is right, there is not much difference in fuel consumption between 2wd and awd, maybe .3-.5 worse in awd. With this type of system, almost all of the driveline drag is constant whether engaged or not. I almost always have mine in 2wd because I notice a slight increase in steering torque feedback (like a front drive car) when turning and in awd mode. While I do like having the ability to choose 2wd, the V8 is such a great engine and the 4wd system on these vehicles is so seamless I would think 2x about eliminating the V8 option simply because of not having 2wd.

Nathana92 10-13-2012 10:47 AM

I'm glad I don't have the option to select 2wd with the V8. My pretty mud terrains would just get converted to smoke.tehe

Gerdo 10-13-2012 10:47 AM

I do believe that it is a full time four wheel drive and technically not ALL wheel drive.

There is a huge difference between the two.

M1911 10-13-2012 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveK22 (Post 1192595)
I have been shopping for a 4th Gen for a few months now. Not in a hurry so taking my time till I find the right one.

I have ruled out the V8 mainly because I don't like the idea of full time AWD. Why did Toyota do that? Wouldn't gas mileage be much better if you could turn it off...like the the V6?

Most of the reports from V6 and V8 owners are that the V6 only gets 1-2 mpg better than the V8. So I doubt that V8 mileage would be much better if it had a multi-mode system.

Quote:

Any V8 owners agree that they would like the option to go RWD?
I don't see any reason for it.

Synister 10-13-2012 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerdo (Post 1192627)
I do believe that it is a full time four wheel drive and technically not ALL wheel drive.

There is a huge difference between the two.

Pretty sure the 4th gen qualifies as AWD due to the torque split front to rear and ability for more or less torque to be applied as conditions warrant. The torsen center diff is the same one used in Audi's quattro system, ours is just lockable.

rebelbowtie 10-13-2012 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Synister (Post 1192643)
Pretty sure the 4th gen qualifies as AWD due to the torque split front to rear and ability for more or less torque to be applied as conditions warrant. The torsen center diff is the same one used in Audi's quattro system, ours is just lockable.

Exactly!

NJshadow93 10-13-2012 11:24 AM

I used to drive a 2005 RAV4 before my 4Runner, that was considered full time 4WD and not AWD. The new ones however ARE considered AWD though from what I understand. Beats the hell out of me.

JB. 10-13-2012 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveK22 (Post 1192595)
I have ruled out the V8 mainly because I don't like the idea of full time AWD. Why did Toyota do that?

I'm guessing it's because it's the same (luxury) drive train that was on the Lexus GX and Land Cruiser.

rebelbowtie 10-13-2012 04:35 PM

I think it's pretty asinine to discount the v8 based on the fact it's AWD. It is a Torsen T6 differential which is identical to world renowned Audi Quattro system. Once you own an AWD vehicle you won't want to go back, I know after owning my Audi I will never buy another non AWD car unless it's a pick up truck.

Flyer 10-13-2012 05:00 PM

Educate us on the V8 4R AWD...
 
Could someone explain how the 4R AWD system works? For example, this is what I know (or think I know) about Subarus:

Auto: 90% Front; 10% Rear till the wheels sense slippage- then is becomes 60% Front and 40% Rear.

Manual: 50%-50% split all the time.

Not sure if that is correct but it is what I have gathered from posts online. I'd like to know how the V8 4R AWD system works. If you can compare it to an Auto Subaru, that would be even cooler.

BlackWorksInc 10-13-2012 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Synister (Post 1192643)
Pretty sure the 4th gen qualifies as AWD due to the torque split front to rear and ability for more or less torque to be applied as conditions warrant. The torsen center diff is the same one used in Audi's quattro system, ours is just lockable.

The V8 is considered All-Time 4 Wheel Drive, the reason being simply that while we have a central differential much like many other AWD systems, we also have a Hi & Low range gearing in our transfer case along with the locking ability, they are more similar in function to a Selectable 4WD system than a true AWD system that only has one set of gearing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveK22 (Post 1192595)
I have been shopping for a 4th Gen for a few months now. Not in a hurry so taking my time till I find the right one.

I have ruled out the V8 mainly because I don't like the idea of full time AWD. Why did Toyota do that? Wouldn't gas mileage be much better if you could turn it off...like the the V6?

Any V8 owners agree that they would like the option to go RWD? Also, I have read a few posts saying the mpg isn't that much different...maybe so but just hard to fathom how that can be.

If you're shopping for a 4Runner based on gas mileage, just stop right now.

I'm not trying to be rude, but people seem to make this mistake far too much. While better gas mileage is ideal, most Body on Frame SUV's seem to get around 16~18mpg realistically on average. The V6 & V8 powertrains have little mpg difference due to weight more than anything else. If 20 miles per tank is that important to you, you're in the wrong market for a vehicle like this. Its like someone wanting to buy a heavy duty diesel 3500 truck for hauling construction equipment fretting that the competitor's has 1mpg more rather than the fact the models may have totally different hauling abilities.

The best thing you can do is look at the average MPG, settle for that and figure out if it is in your budget to afford the fuel ON TOP of the vehicle cost. I am not happy that my V8 guzzles gas (at $4.67 ish, its about $90 to fill 20ish gallons), but I knew full well I would have to budget for a possible $5 a gallon operating cost for the power, reliability, and over all satisfaction of having, (In my honest opinion) one the the best modern body on frame midsized SUV on the market.

As for why Toyota did not provide an option to shift the vehicle into 2WD? Honestly, I'm not sure. It could have been as simply as they thought tire wear, wasted power to the wheels, and over all performance just wasn't worth it. The all-time 4WD system on the V8's is far better than those horrible ones found in Jeeps, GMs, Honda, ect. The V8's system provides great performance, reliability, and comfort to the point that you really don't notice the difference between a 2WD system. Granted, if you're cornering the vehicle like a race car and wanting burnouts for fun, then you may not be happy with it, but in normal driving, off-road, and over all conditions the All-Time 4WD system is such a nice design, most V6 driver's leave their vehicles in 4Hi to get the same benefits.

Cosmic 10-13-2012 06:37 PM

V8 is a blast to drive
 
My 03 Limited V8 is a blast to drive. It's also my first AWD vehicle and won't be my last. The torque of the V8 in combination with AWD is fun as hell at stop lights. Wet or dry, the truck jumps off the line with no wheel spin or drama. It's really addicting. My 4runner is my daily driver even though I own other vehicles that get better mileage. I love this Toyota.

Presta24 10-13-2012 06:49 PM

I have the V8 and love the awd or full time 4WD, whichever lol, its amazing in the rain, I have tried m hardest to spin em in the rain with very little luck. Its nice to know when traveling on the hwy in snow or rain, you have that added traction. Like BlackWorks said, if a few miles a tank is gonna sway you away from the V8......

rebelbowtie 10-13-2012 06:55 PM

This forum seems so strange to me in the v6/v8 debate. Every single other automotive circle I've ever been in this is a no brainer, if a v8 is offered you buy the v8. You won't see this on any other forum.

toybox 10-13-2012 07:21 PM

I love the V8. I love the confidence of the full-time 4wd. If I was worried about 1 or 2 mpg I woundn't have even bought the V8 or even a truck for that matter. Having owned everything from manual front wheel locks to landcruisers with full-time 4wd, I much prefer the what I have and it is one of the disappointing things about the 5th gen (besides not offering the V8)

Flyer 10-13-2012 09:19 PM

Looks like a boxer in your avatar. Mine loved the back window rolling down. She rarely barked but stared at people behind us...most got a kick out of that. Funny thing....one reason I bought the 4R was because of that feature and because of her. Miss that funny dog. Boxers are amazing!

Quote:

Originally Posted by toybox (Post 1192927)
I love the V8. I love the confidence of the full-time 4wd. If I was worried about 1 or 2 mpg I woundn't have even bought the V8 or even a truck for that matter. Having owned everything from manual front wheel locks to landcruisers with full-time 4wd, I much prefer the what I have and it is one of the disappointing things about the 5th gen (besides not offering the V8)


04rnr 10-13-2012 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackWorksInc (Post 1192840)
If you're shopping for a 4Runner based on gas mileage, just stop right now.

and this for the :trophy:

TRDCal 10-13-2012 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyer (Post 1192835)
Could someone explain how the 4R AWD system works? For example, this is what I know (or think I know) about Subarus:

Auto: 90% Front; 10% Rear till the wheels sense slippage- then is becomes 60% Front and 40% Rear.

Manual: 50%-50% split all the time.

From what I understand...with the center diff unlocked its naturally split 50%-50% but in the event of a slip, you can have a max torque split of 60% Front - 40% Rear or up to 30% Front - 70% Rear. With the center diff locked its 50%- 50% all the time.

2007toyota4runners 10-13-2012 11:20 PM

It was actually raining today and i pulled up to a stoplight and threw it into 4WD and hammered down and i finally got the front wheels to spin after 80000 miles of trying haha. The 4WD works so dam well in the 4runner

Flyer 10-14-2012 12:06 AM

There is one scenario where an auto Subaru (at least the base models) are no better than a FWD car. If you are going around a snowy corner a bit fast (like an entrance ramp from one highway to the other) it acts just like a FWD car...useless. I am not sure if my 4R would have acted that way but I gently let off the gas and it went into the widest opposing fishtails I have ever been in. The day after, I had dedicated winter tires. My other tires were like-new Michelin Pilot Exaltos with 2K on them when the incident happened. I was doing right around 55 on a 55 ramp...too fast for that night...it had started to snow. No, i have not attempted to recreate that. :jaw drop:

NJshadow93 10-14-2012 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRDCal (Post 1193095)
From what I understand...with the center diff unlocked its naturally split 50%-50% but in the event of a slip, you can have a max torque split of 60% Front - 40% Rear or up to 30% Front - 70% Rear. With the center diff locked its 50%- 50% all the time.

Exactly! That is why my 2005 RAV4 was considered full time 4WD even though it did not have low range gearing or a locker, it was the 50/50 split unless the traction control felt otherwise.

haute 10-14-2012 02:35 AM

When I bought mine this summer, I specifically looked for the V8 after I did my research and discovered the gas mileage was for all intents and practical purposes equal to the V6.

The i-Force V8 is a monster of an engine, and all that torque... just so sweet to have if you're doing anything other than flat, boring driving.

I came from a Pathfinder and have driven friends' 4Runners - 2WD SUVs are just awful to drive in the rain/inclement weather, so the full-time 4WD is just awesome. It sticks to the road no matter what.

I wish I could find an official citation, but its actually 60/40 rear/front split during regular driving, and w/o the differential being locked will shift as much as 75 to the rear and as much 53 to the front. I thought 53 was such an oddball number, which is why I seem to remember that.

Fwiw to the OP, I have also been tracking my gas mileage via a log on my phone, testing premium (91 octane) and mid-grade (89), since the V8 calls for premium fuel. I am averaging 14-16mpg. I have found NO DIFFERENCE in the two grades. I plan on switching to regular soon to see if that makes any difference.

I have seen some people reporting 20mpg for the V8, but I think they must be on crack or doing some pretty nifty calculations. For some context, I tow a trailer 3-4x/week, and also work on top of a mountain, which means 5x/week I climb 1200ft in only a few short miles.

All in all though, I'm so glad I bought the V8. The power, the proven track record of that i-Force engine, 5 speed transmission, and full time 4WD... how can you go wrong?!

Oh ya, and would I want a 2WD option? No. Never. We have a Volvo XC70 2.5T AWD and now the full-time 4WD 4Runner - I will NEVER own a 2wd vehicle again unless I have to. Once you've had the regular confidence of AWD at your control, I dont see how anyone wouldnt want it.

Merle 10-14-2012 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haute (Post 1193211)
I have seen some people reporting 20mpg for the V8, but I think they must be on crack or doing some pretty nifty calculations. For some context, I tow a trailer 3-4x/week, and also work on top of a mountain, which means 5x/week I climb 1200ft in only a few short miles.

Keep it under 60 on the interstate and you'll see 20 mpg easily. Tahoe to San Francisco could get me 22-24 mpg. San Francisco to Tahoe would get me 20-22 mpg. The key was not dropping the hammer.

Now, dropping the hammer on US 50 and blasting away on the road past Placerville to Echo Summit would net me 15-16 mpg.

Done the drive between the two 100+ times.

All the time 4WD is great, not perfect (it takes a few moments to engage) but is a lot better than pulling over or stopping and trying to engage the 4WD.

boondoggle 10-14-2012 03:57 AM

This PDF from Toyota University verifies the dynamic 40/60 front/rear torque spilt. In the Transfer Case section.

There's also a cool powerband graph for the V8 on page 7.

http://www.toyota120.com/GenDocs/2003_4Runner.pdf

rebelbowtie 10-14-2012 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyer (Post 1193145)
There is one scenario where an auto Subaru (at least the base models) are no better than a FWD car. If you are going around a snowy corner a bit fast (like an entrance ramp from one highway to the other) it acts just like a FWD car...useless. I am not sure if my 4R would have acted that way but I gently let off the gas and it went into the widest opposing fishtails I have ever been in. The day after, I had dedicated winter tires. My other tires were like-new Michelin Pilot Exaltos with 2K on them when the incident happened. I was doing right around 55 on a 55 ramp...too fast for that night...it had started to snow. No, i have not attempted to recreate that. :jaw drop:

Sounds to me you experienced lift off oversteer, you should have not let off the accelerator.

zimm 10-14-2012 07:53 AM

The full time 4wd is a bonus, not a detractor. So is the Lexus sourced V8. The whole reason I picked the 4runner over the competition. Like others said, if MPG is more important than body on frame construction, having low range, a 7,300 lbs tow rating, etc- get something that'll do better than 14/17 city highway.

If you're seriously not going to tow or off-road, get a car based SUV like the highlander. More room inside, and much better mpgs. Just no low range or off-roadability and don't try to tow anything with it.

JPWendtinc 10-14-2012 08:10 AM

As previously mentioned, if you are concerned about MPG, start looking at something other than a Runner. 75% of my driving is city stop and go. I see a realistic MPG of 13.7 with my V8.

That being said, I wouldn't trade if for the world. This is without a doubt the most reliable and fun truck I have ever driven.

hkollie1 10-14-2012 08:14 AM

I agree with all the posts voting in favor of the AWD V8 as designed...

One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that with an AWD we accept the fact we have more moving parts....resulting in eventual maintenance. I personally provided the opportunity would not disengage the front axles very often.

Back when 4WD's commonly had locking hubs, it used to drive me crazy in foul weather when my buddies, rasied in snow country would continue to drive with the hubs unlocked and the Tfer case in 2WD!!

Anyhoo...if the OP didn't get the message that his supposition was ill founded...then he is not listening or didn't want info.

:roadkill:

MikeInNH 10-14-2012 09:15 AM

Quote:

This forum seems so strange to me in the v6/v8 debate. Every single other automotive circle I've ever been in this is a no brainer, if a v8 is offered you buy the v8. You won't see this on any other forum.
Why buy something you don't need? Why buy something which has an added expense of a timing belt every 100k miles?? Why buy something that has less room to work on the engine? Why buy a vehicle that only has awd? Why buy a vehicle that gets worse gas mileage?

You're right...it is a no brainer.

zimm 10-14-2012 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeInNH (Post 1193282)
Why buy something you don't need? Why buy something which has an added expense of a timing belt every 100k miles?? Why buy something that has less room to work on the engine? Why buy a vehicle that only has awd? Why buy a vehicle that gets worse gas mileage?

You're right...it is a no brainer.

Ha, thought you were serious for a second. I was going to add, just the V8 sound is worth it. Although the oil filter access is a PITA.

rebelbowtie 10-14-2012 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeInNH (Post 1193282)
Why buy something you don't need? Why buy something which has an added expense of a timing belt every 100k miles?? Why buy something that has less room to work on the engine? Why buy a vehicle that only has awd? Why buy a vehicle that gets worse gas mileage?

You're right...it is a no brainer.

Ignorance is bliss Mike and you sir are blissfully ignorant

DaveK22 10-14-2012 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveK22 (Post 1192595)
I have been shopping for a 4th Gen for a few months now. Not in a hurry so taking my time till I find the right one.

I have ruled out the V8 mainly because I don't like the idea of full time AWD. Why did Toyota do that? Wouldn't gas mileage be much better if you could turn it off...like the the V6?

Any V8 owners agree that they would like the option to go RWD? Also, I have read a few posts saying the mpg isn't that much different...maybe so but just hard to fathom how that can be.

For those making it sound like it's ONLY about mpg, maybe I wasn't totally clear because it is not. That is only part of it. In regards to my original post, "...don't like the idea of full time AWD..." I guess I should have elaborated. I basically was wondering how people feel about not being to switch from RWD to 4WD. About all the moving parts, all the time, tight turning, etc.

If I wanted a high mpg, then I agree, wrong vehicle. I am considering the 4R for the occasional boat tow & ski trips, the rest being 2nd family car. So mpg not the end game.

Thanks for all the great feedback so far though. At least now you have confinced me to at least test drive one to see what the infamous torque is like & how it does at slow speed tight turns (as compared to my 4x4 truck).

rebelbowtie 10-14-2012 12:03 PM

It drives just like a regular part time 4x4 in 2wd you won't notice a difference

Merle 10-14-2012 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveK22 (Post 1193347)
For those making it sound like it's ONLY about mpg, maybe I wasn't totally clear because it is not. That is only part of it. In regards to my original post, "...don't like the idea of full time AWD..." I guess I should have elaborated. I basically was wondering how people feel about not being to switch from RWD to 4WD. About all the moving parts, all the time, tight turning, etc.

If I wanted a high mpg, then I agree, wrong vehicle. I am considering the 4R for the occasional boat tow & ski trips, the rest being 2nd family car. So mpg not the end game.

Thanks for all the great feedback so far though. At least now you have confinced me to at least test drive one to see what the infamous torque is like & how it does at slow speed tight turns (as compared to my 4x4 truck).

A bit more than 140,000 for my 2008, and I drive in some of the worst conditions you can find -- The Sierra Nevada's and California traffic.

In the city, the part-time 4WD works fine; corners, high speed cloverleafs, parking lot 5mph bumpers, etc. We don't get torrential downpours where I go, so asphalt and rain isn't really a concern (and any car can get through 1' of water with a bit of due diligence.

Because I consider my vehicle "high mileage" at this point, we do have to check out how it was maintained. The 4wd has 3 differentials, and I changed the fluid to synthetic at 30,000 and about 60,000 after that (Shell Spirax). Only a monthly basis, you are a supposed to engage the 4wd (which reminds me...) to keep things lubricated, which is easy to forget. I did have a fluid leak one time that went away after I topped of my front diff in about 10,000+ miles (which I believe was because I over filled).

For the snow, a 4WD that engages automatically is a mixed blessing. If you're trucking along, blowing past the chain check point, life is good. BUT when you're approaching that hill, you want to have it engaged and manually engaging it is a good thing. But recognize that if you do engage it, a tight turning radius can be considered bad - which is a negative for the manual engagement (or dropping it into 4-lo). For me, it's good that I can take the tight turns and have the 4wd figure things out, even with 4wd engaged. The only draw back is the engagement time, takes a moment (1-2 seconds, but can be <1 second if the timing is perfect)

For rock crawling (another joy of the Sierras) you're going to drop it into 4-lo most of the time because you're doing straight line crawls. Your turn radius isn't a big deal (no switchbacks where I'm taking my 4Runner) either. BUT if you're trail running AND encounter a rock garden, you may not have the time/opportunity to engage (engage, roll forward, back, etc.) the 4wd. This is also where the part time is great. As things start breaking loose, the 4wd will engage - you may get some wheel spin, but you will have 4wd.

At least that's my opinion. YMMV.

JB. 10-14-2012 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveK22 (Post 1193347)
For those making it sound like it's ONLY about mpg, maybe I wasn't totally clear because it is not. That is only part of it. In regards to my original post, "...don't like the idea of full time AWD..." I guess I should have elaborated. I basically was wondering how people feel about......all the moving parts......etc.

Well, gas mileage is about the only significant reason, and it only applies to the engine choice, not the full time driveline setup which is a very small contributor.

Not that the following is real important, but for the purpose of explaining why most knocks against the V8 setup are irrelevant, I'll point out that, if anything, the V6 is more complicated and more prone to negligence problems. It has an ADD (automatic disconnecting differential) system in the front that spins all the time and increases wear on various front components. The V8 AWD spreads drive forces around which, on paper, should result in less overall wear. It's well established here that lack of exercise of the transfer case actuator motors is the major contributor to frozen or leaky cases. Exercising the actuators is more easily done in the V8. A small thing, but a plus nonetheless.

The extra moving parts and wear and tear idea doesn't hold any water.

M1911 10-14-2012 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRDCal (Post 1193095)
With the center diff locked its 50%- 50% all the time.

I would put it a bit differently. With the center diff locked, the front and rear driveshafts turn at the same speed.

04rnr 10-14-2012 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zimm (Post 1193297)
Ha, thought you were serious for a second. I was going to add, just the V8 sound is worth it. Although the oil filter access is a PITA.

oil filter relocation kit and done...
TOYOTA 4RUNNER Mr. Gasket Oil Filter Relocation Kits - In Stock - SummitRacing.com

M1911 10-14-2012 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveK22 (Post 1193347)
For those making it sound like it's ONLY about mpg, maybe I wasn't totally clear because it is not. That is only part of it. In regards to my original post, "...don't like the idea of full time AWD..." I guess I should have elaborated. I basically was wondering how people feel about not being to switch from RWD to 4WD. About all the moving parts, all the time, tight turning, etc.

There is no problem with tight turning, because of the Torsen center differential.

In a part-time 4WD system, when you put it in 4WD the front and rear driveshafts turn at the same speed. When you go around a corner, the rear wheels cut inside the path of the front wheels, so the rear wheels travel a shorter distance. As a result, the rear driveshaft needs to turn fewer revolutions than the front driveshaft. Since the front and rear driveshafts must turn at the same speed in a part-time 4WD system, it is hard to turn tightly on dry pavement (and potentially damaging to the drivetrain).

But the 4th gen 4Runners are not part-time 4WD. They are full-time 4WD. The center differential allows the front and rear driveshafts to turn at different speeds. Think about what a rear differential does -- it has an input shaft, two output shafts, and allows the two output shafts to turn at different speeds. The center diff does the same thing.

As a result of that center diff, there is no scrubbing when making a tight turn in a 4th Gen 4Runner, as long as the center diff is unlocked. If you lock the center diff, then the front and rear driveshafts turn at the same speed so it behaves like a part-time system.

As for "all the moving parts all the time," what moving parts are you worried about? So the front driveshaft, half-shafts, and front diff are turning. So what? Those aren't exactly parts that tend to wear out quickly. And if you need to accelerate quickly in the rain, like entering a fast road from a parking lot, the truck just goes -- you don't have to worry about spinning your rear wheels as you might in RWD. You never have to ask yourself "should I put it in 4WD or not" -- it already is in 4WD.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
***This site is an unofficial Toyota site, and is not officially endorsed, supported, authorized by or affiliated with Toyota. All company, product, or service names references in this web site are used for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Toyota name, marks, designs and logos, as well as Toyota model names, are registered trademarks of Toyota Motor Corporation***Ad Management plugin by RedTyger