Toyota 4Runner Forum - Largest 4Runner Forum

Toyota 4Runner Forum - Largest 4Runner Forum (https://www.toyota-4runner.org/)
-   5th gen T4Rs (https://www.toyota-4runner.org/5th-gen-t4rs/)
-   -   Tell me about re-gearing my 5th gen (https://www.toyota-4runner.org/5th-gen-t4rs/239374-tell-me-about-re-gearing-my-5th-gen.html)

dhatcher 06-08-2017 02:11 PM

Tell me about re-gearing my 5th gen
 
As I'm working on things to do to my 4runner (bumpers, lift, 285s), I'm starting to come across the subject of "re-gearing" a lot more. It came up recently during a class I took for learning more about off road driving. It was recommended that for a trail like the Rubicon that you have at least a 55 crawl ratio as calculated at 4lo.com

I was playing around with the calculator a little bit and starting to understand why people go from 3.73 to 4.56 or 4.88 or even 5.29.

My questions are probably somewhat basic, is this something people do to their daily driver rigs? Once you're into re-gearing are you pretty much relegating the use of your rig to off road driving or is it still suitable to slog through bay area commute traffic at 15 mph? Can I still go 65mph on the highway without relative pain? I'm sure gas mileage suffers just wondering if it's still bearable for daily driving use.

Also, how does re-gearing affect things like the factory locker, traction control, the speedometer and how do people work around or with these factors?

Thank you for any help, as always, greatly appreciated (i did search the 5th gen forums for re-gearing and found about 3 threads which I did skim through but, they seemed centered more about someone who already made up their mind to re-gear and just wondering what they should re-gear to).

BigredTEX 06-08-2017 03:37 PM

Re-gearing to 4.56 was one of the best things I have done to my rig. You can see in my signature everything else I've done.

This is my daily driver. I wouldn't go deeper than 4.56 if you intend to also drive it daily on the street. You will immediately notice more pep in city driving with a slight boost in MPG to boot. 65 mph on the highway is slow in my part of the world and you won't notice any degradation in highway performance at that speed, except that your cruise control will work much better without dropping one or two gears at the slightest hill and then overspeeding before settling back down. I cruise at 75 mph with no issues other than a slight drop in mpg, but it makes up for it by being much more responsive.

I say all this with 33 inch tires in mind. I plan to go to 34's later this year (285/75), which I probably won't notice a difference in city driving but will gain some legs on the highway. If you are planning to make your rig strictly a trail rig then 4.88 would be appropriate, but I don't see that working too well on the street.

In stock trim I feel the truck is geared too high and would work better with 3.90 of 4.10 gears. With 4.56 gears and 33 inch tires it feels more like it was intended if Toyota wasn't so occupied with mpg. In addition, the transmission shift points now seem to be much better integrated to the overall performance of the vehicle.

Bottom line, if you go to 33 inch tires, lift and some armor (bumper, skids, sliders, winch, etc.) 4.56 gears are appropriate and will give you better performance than stock.

dhatcher 06-08-2017 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigredTEX (Post 2718351)
Re-gearing to 4.56 was one of the best things I have done to my rig. You can see in my signature everything else I've done.

This is my daily driver. I wouldn't go deeper than 4.56 if you intend to also drive it daily on the street. You will immediately notice more pep in city driving with a slight boost in MPG to boot. 65 mph on the highway is slow in my part of the world and you won't notice any degradation in highway performance at that speed, except that your cruise control will work much better without dropping one or two gears at the slightest hill and then overspeeding before settling back down. I cruise at 75 mph with no issues other than a slight drop in mpg, but it makes up for it by being much more responsive.

I say all this with 33 inch tires in mind. I plan to go to 34's later this year (285/75), which I probably won't notice a difference in city driving but will gain some legs on the highway. If you are planning to make your rig strictly a trail rig then 4.88 would be appropriate, but I don't see that working too well on the street.

In stock trim I feel the truck is geared too high and would work better with 3.90 of 4.10 gears. With 4.56 gears and 33 inch tires it feels more like it was intended if Toyota wasn't so occupied with mpg. In addition, the transmission shift points now seem to be much better integrated to the overall performance of the vehicle.

Bottom line, if you go to 33 inch tires, lift and some armor (bumper, skids, sliders, winch, etc.) 4.56 gears are appropriate and will give you better performance than stock.

Thank you, that's exactly the kind of experience I was looking for. I had read a little in the other threads that 4.56 was questionable in some regards but, seems like you didn't have trouble with it? I'm planning for 285/70 (have 275/70 right now) and all the armor you mentioned (already have the rock sliders).

How did it affect your factory locker or traction control (if it did)? Were you able to keep it or did you have to throw it out and get air locker?

wfo9 06-08-2017 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dhatcher (Post 2718382)
Thank you, that's exactly the kind of experience I was looking for. I had read a little in the other threads that 4.56 was questionable in some regards but, seems like you didn't have trouble with it? I'm planning for 285/70 (have 275/70 right now) and all the armor you mentioned (already have the rock sliders).

How did it affect your factory locker or traction control (if it did)? Were you able to keep it or did you have to throw it out and get air locker?

Gearing will have no impact on any of the things you mentioned. Totally unrelated. Tire size will impact ATRAC.... but not gearing.

BigredTEX 06-08-2017 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dhatcher (Post 2718382)
Thank you, that's exactly the kind of experience I was looking for. I had read a little in the other threads that 4.56 was questionable in some regards but, seems like you didn't have trouble with it? I'm planning for 285/70 (have 275/70 right now) and all the armor you mentioned (already have the rock sliders).

How did it affect your factory locker or traction control (if it did)? Were you able to keep it or did you have to throw it out and get air locker?



What wfo9 said. No effect whatsoever on locker, speedo or ATRAC.

lmturne1 06-08-2017 06:09 PM

Silly question but i have to ask for clarity. When one regears their rig, are they regearing all 3 differentials (Front, transfercase, and rear), only the front and rear, or only the rear?

Where can the gears be found, who can perform the service, and how much is someone looking at for the whole process?


*Crawls back underneath rock*

Engineer 06-08-2017 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lmturne1 (Post 2718501)
Silly question but i have to ask for clarity. When one regears their rig, are they regearing all 3 differentials (Front, transfercase, and rear), only the front and rear, or only the rear?

Where can the gears be found, who can perform the service, and how much is someone looking at for the whole process?


*Crawls back underneath rock*

Only the front and rear, the center differential (does not exist on SR5 and Trail/TRD models - only limited) is not something you change gears in like a ring and pinion gears in the diffs. while it is called a differential same as front and rear the similarities really end there. Google Torsen T3 if you want to know more.

Nitto makes the gears or Toyota( only offered in 4.56 and going to be $$$). East Coast Gear supply is a reputable shop where you can see pricing for just the parts or completed thirds and front clamshells to do the swap yourself.

A lot of folks go ahead and add an ARB front Air locker while they are at it which adds cost (~$800-1000) + compressor cost

IMHO if you have to ask 4.56 is likely the right choice and 4.88 you need to understand what you are getting if you go that route (not directed at you, just a general statement)

wfo9 06-08-2017 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lmturne1 (Post 2718501)
Silly question but i have to ask for clarity. When one regears their rig, are they regearing all 3 differentials (Front, transfercase, and rear), only the front and rear, or only the rear?

Where can the gears be found, who can perform the service, and how much is someone looking at for the whole process?


*Crawls back underneath rock*

We are talking about ring and pinion in the front and rear differentials...

There is a low range reduction gear in the transfer case... but there is currently no option to run a higher reduction gear. I really wish there was...... I don't think there is enough room...

Cost is going to vary greatly based on who does the install. The ring and pinions are not that much 500-750... but it typically gets up pretty high 1500+ with labor.

lmturne1 06-08-2017 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wfo9 (Post 2718524)
We are talking about ring and pinion in the front and rear differentials...

There is a low range reduction gear in the transfer case... but there is currently no option to run a higher reduction gear. I really wish there was...... I don't think there is enough room...

Cost is going to vary greatly based on who does the install. The ring and pinions are not that much 500-750... but it typically gets up pretty high 1500+ with labor.

So regear with installation along with an airlocker, probably being from ARB, will yield a locked front end with a better power curve for daily driving with a fully loaded rig for roughly $2500.

Any hesitation to lock the front as the CV axles are exposed and would be prone to break? I would lock a straight axle if, for some reason, it wasn't already. Just a little skeptical on locking IFS...

CharlestonFisher 06-08-2017 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lmturne1 (Post 2718573)
So regear with installation along with an airlocker, probably being from ARB, will yield a locked front end with a better power curve for daily driving with a fully loaded rig for roughly $2500.



Any hesitation to lock the front as the CV axles are exposed and would be prone to break? I would lock a straight axle if, for some reason, it wasn't already. Just a little skeptical on locking IFS...



I wouldn't add a locker to the front, quickest way to have a catastrophic failure on the trails. Too much for IFS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ToyoT4R 06-08-2017 08:23 PM

It would be interesting if Gear Vendors developed an under/overdrive setup for the 4Runner. Then you could go to a 4.88:1 with an overdrive or use an under drive for off-road only.

https://www.gearvendors.com/4x4.html

willie2323 06-08-2017 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToyoT4R (Post 2718622)
It would be interesting if Gear Vendors developed an under/overdrive setup for the 4Runner. Then you could go to a 4.88:1 with an overdrive or use an under drive for off-road only.

https://www.gearvendors.com/4x4.html

Ah for the good ol days...back in 1970 I purchased my first 4WD (and still own it), a 1971 CJ5 Jeep. Before purchase I was pleasantly surprised when I took a look at the rear diff and saw the 4.89 posi tag. I knew immediately what I was going to do and did so within the week...purchased a 0.7 to 1 Warn overdrive that slapped right on the end of the offset transfer case (last year you could do this as in 72 the jeep line went to AMC but that's a story for another time...). These gears were perfect for off road and the overdrive made the V6 manageable on the highway. It is also a lot of fun to shift the fully syncro OD as you walk up thru the gears, still do it to this day!
cheers,
willie

Jeremy556 06-08-2017 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlestonFisher (Post 2718620)
I wouldn't add a locker to the front, quickest way to have a catastrophic failure on the trails. Too much for IFS.

My stock CVs are close to 100K miles with a locker (190k total) and I spend a lot of time on difficult trails.

4.56 gears are my favorite mod.

wfo9 06-08-2017 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlestonFisher (Post 2718620)
I wouldn't add a locker to the front, quickest way to have a catastrophic failure on the trails. Too much for IFS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nope, not too much for IFS. I do way less damage to my rig on a given trail due to the front locker. I've watched others destroy their CVs with intense shock loads trying to momentum up an obstacle or with ATRAC jerking all over the place like a bucking bronco. I just crawl right up without any drama or parts flying...

Now... you can put more stress with a locker, since one wheel can take all the torque... and you can clearly bind things up. And if you don't know what you are doing...bad things can happen. It takes some skill and practice to know how and when to use it.. I just totally disagree that it is too much for IFS. I'm mostly silky smooth with mine now, but I have screwed up with it a few times and it held up fine.

CharlestonFisher 06-08-2017 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wfo9 (Post 2718703)
Nope, not too much for IFS. I do way less damage to my rig on a given trail due to the front locker. I've watched others destroy their CVs with intense shock loads trying to momentum up an obstacle or with ATRAC jerking all over the place like a bucking bronco. I just crawl right up without any drama or parts flying...

Now... you can put more stress with a locker, since one wheel can take all the torque... and you can clearly bind things up. And if you don't know what you are doing...bad things can happen. It takes some skill and practice to know how and when to use it.. I just totally disagree that it is too much for IFS. I'm mostly silky smooth with mine now, but I have screwed up with it a few times and it held up fine.


No doubt wild driving will lead to CV failures. Your description is spot on. I'm maintaining my opinion that locking the front is asking for trouble, but you make some good points.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
***This site is an unofficial Toyota site, and is not officially endorsed, supported, authorized by or affiliated with Toyota. All company, product, or service names references in this web site are used for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Toyota name, marks, designs and logos, as well as Toyota model names, are registered trademarks of Toyota Motor Corporation***Ad Management plugin by RedTyger