OT - Floridians, Time to Help yourself

GregGimbert

New member
Orlando Sentinel

Legislature puts growth in your hands
Lauren Ritchie COMMENTARY

July 2, 2006

MEEKNESS, n. Uncommon patience in planning a revenge that is worth while.

-- Ambrose Bierce The Devil's Dictionary

Ready for a little revenge?

The 1984 Miss America who resigned her crown when Penthouse threatened to release revealing pictures of her said it best: "Success is the sweetest revenge."

Okay, rub your hands together in anticipation and let loose with an evil cackle.

The state that sold its soul to developers may be about to turn as unfriendly as downtown Baghdad during a Quran-burning party sponsored by the local infidels.

The Florida Supreme Court has said voters in 2008 can decide on a constitutional amendment that would change dramatically the way subdivisions get approved.

It could save this state.

The amendment would snatch growth decisions from the soiled hands of elected officials and put them back with the people who live here: It would require that every change in a local government's comprehensive plan -- the so-called "blueprint" that determines what can be built where -- be approved by voters in a referendum.

Think of it.

Every Floridian who has watched trees hacked off a swath of land for another Butt-Ugly Development (BUD); whose child or grandchild is being taught in an overcrowded trailer called a classroom; whose water well is sucking sand; who can't fish or swim in a local lake anymore; whose roads have turned into parking lots; whose taxes are always going up; and who is sick of being told the lie "You can't stop growth," can take control of the destiny of his or her community.

Instead of living at the mercy of the sprawl junkies in elected office, voters could decide for themselves whether they want more growth. Imagine. People who live here now could get what they want.

Critics have blasted the proposed amendment as an anti-development measure. How can that be? It simply gives voters a choice. If people in a particular county want less development and are willing to accept the results -- good and bad -- then that's the way it ought to be. The same is true if they want more growth.

What a fun little exercise in democracy this could be.

Instead of buying off three elected prostitutes on a five-member board or paying to put three puppets into office or just finding three dopes, developers would have to convince the electorate of a county or city that their proposed subdivision is a marvelous idea.

Finally, justice.

But it won't happen unless Florida voters step forward right now. The grass-roots group working to get this amendment before voters is called Florida Hometown Democracy, and it needs 611,000 signatures of registered voters to get the amendment on the ballot in 2008. Organizers have 70,000 verified and another 15,000 yet to be submitted.

If you signed a petition last year, you've got to do it again. That's because the wording of the initial amendment was thrown out by the Supreme Court and has been changed. Go to FloridaHometownDemocracy.com for instructions and a petition. If you're not computer savvy, write Florida Hometown Democracy, Inc. P.O. Box 636, New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170 or phone the Palm Beach Office at 561-659-5754, and the group will send you a stack.

What a shame it has to be this way. If elected officials had been more reserved in approvals and developers less greedy, this group wouldn't exist.

"People run for these county and city commissions, and they forget who they're representing, and they forget what their job is," said Lesley Blackner, the environmental lawyer who is one of the South Florida group's founders. "The law is clear -- the whole function of municipal government is to protect the quality of life of the citizenry.

"Too many commissioners of the county and city level, and also state representatives, simply define their job as keeping the development machine running.

"These commissioners have no vision for the future."

This is a voter's chance to show them what vision is.

Lauren Ritchie can be reached at [email protected]r 352-742-5918.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...2,0,3248236.column?coll=orl-news-utility-lake



Please download from our website and SIGN THE PETITION ! http://www.FloridaHometownDemocracy.com
FHD, PO Box 636, New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170-0636.
 
Register to hide this ad
Awesome. As a longtime resident of the Daytona Beach area (long before is started booming with new development ...), I am glad to see that someone out there is doing something to help protect our cities. I lived way out in the country in Daytona years and year ago --- but now huge developments have made their way out there and taken over all of the big fields and forests that used to line the roads. It's sad to see.
 
I agree that urban sprawl is way out of control, and that it does seem that local government sees themselves as facilitators in that process. They don't seem to question whether or not a development is a good concept in general; instead, they're debating building setbacks and the color of the siding.

I'd love to see more control over this process. Unfortunately, the plan proposed above wouldn't work in the fringe areas of the Chicago suburbs, as the sprawl is already built into the comprehensive plan! For example, corridors along arterial roads are already paved over and turned into strip malls 20 years from now, even if today it's a two-lane road flanked by cornfields on both sides.

I think the best solution is for our elected officials to have the balls to impose realistic impact fees on developers. Builders of large housing developments merely throw the school district a bone - a little bit of cash, or maybe a piece of land that will still cost the district $20 million to put a school on. And nothing gets contributed to the county road fund, so taxes have to cover more roads and bigger roads. Even worse, cities give retailers tax incentives to build strip malls and box stores, increasing the amount of tax money needed to cover the infrastructure improvements. We need to impose realistic impact fees, and if the developers balk, then fine - we don't need the development!!

The elected officials have to lose the mindset that growth is good, regardless of the cost. It's OK if developers think the cost is too high to build here. Odds are they'll complain but build anyway, and then at least we'll have money for the necessary infrastructure without higher taxes.
 
:iagree:

I agree with the idea and will likely vote for it. Living in South Florida most of my life I have seen the area go from being a good place to live that was easy to get around, to something similar to LA, where it takes forever to get anywhere. There is no more room for more developments, as we have the Everglades to the west, unless our officials want to pave over that too. The highways are already over capacity and blindly adding more subdivisions will likely compound that situation, as there is no effective mass transit system down here. All some our elected officials see is the increase in the tax base and dollar signs. They don
 
In order to vote for it your help is needed to get it ipn the ballot. Please download the petition, signit, & send it in......Tonight! The more you could help inspire to do the same would be appreciated.

Respectfully,

Greg
 
Now...there is something related to the 4runner somewhere in this thread, right?:D

I will move this to Off-Topic over the next few days....
 
There is a vested interest in minimizing the encroachment into our wilderness areas so you have a place to go wheeling WITH A 4RUNNER*.... or somthing like that. I just posted it here as I thought I could get some varied points of view & perhaps get some folks from Florida to actually act on it. Thanks for letting it stay..

I did put it under general discussion....:confused:

* = Admin note.:)
 
GregGimbert said:
There is a vested interest in minimizing the encroachment into our wilderness areas so you have a place to go wheeling WITH A 4RUNNER.... or somthing like that. I just posted it here as I thought I could get some varied points of view & perhaps get some folks from Florida to actually act on it. Thanks for letting it stay..

I did put it under general discussion....:confused:

There...i just fixed this thread for you to involve something about 4runner.:D
 
Development


I don't live in FL, but am familiar with the area and have been there a few times during my life. We in VA are also having "growing pains" and it seems as though our whole state is being paved over by development.

While there are indeed valid points on both sides of the issue (pro-growth and anti-growth people), our county has fallen victim to poor planning and corruption. Also, we are too heavily-dependent upon residential growth for our developments, as opposed to getting more businesses to locate here. Being a bedroom community can be nice sometimes, but the tax burden placed on homeowners is way too high.
:mad:

Years ago, our county potentates thought it would be awesome to encourage development and home-building. The county would make out like a bandit because of the new real estate assessments (versus empty land), and the developers were more than happy to claim what a "win-win" it would be. Well, they screwed the pooch big time.
:bash:

Single-family homes tend to draw people with kids and cars.....but our county somehow forgot to plan for the things that kids and cars need: schools and roads! Since much of the earlier money was mis-spent, now they want to raise taxes - again - and convinced us to float a huge bond referendum two years ago (under the guise of not having to raise taxes). Well, duh! What they did will end up causing the hike in taxes that will be paid by our children and grandchildren.

To top it off, our county supervisors are bragging about how they did not raise our real estate taxes this year. Well, no....they did not hike the rate - but our assessments skyrocketed. If it walks like a duck, quacks and has feathers...........

This is like the government agencies who complain about "cuts" that are really just reductions in the increase of their budgets. If they get five million this year and want seven million next year, but only get six million.....then they call it a one million dollar cut, instead of truthfully labeling it a million dollars more for them.

Not to dismiss the concerns of you folks in Florida, but this problem is going on just about everywhere. But hey - at least you don't have a state income tax down there!
:awais:


 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,083
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top