Quote:
Originally Posted by Thai
Link: New crash test raises bar for frontal protection
""Nearly every new car performs well in other frontal crash tests conducted by the Institute and the federal government, but we still see more than 10,000 deaths in frontal crashes each year," Institute President Adrian Lund says. " Small overlap crashes are a major source of these fatalities. This new test program is based on years of analyzing real-world frontal crashes and then replicating them in our crash test facility to determine how people are being seriously injured and how cars can be designed to protect them better. We think this is the next step in improving frontal crash protection."
In a 2009 Institute study of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants. Another 24 percent of the frontal crashes were moderate overlap crashes, although they likely occurred at much higher speeds than the Institute's moderate overlap test. An additional 14 percent occurred when passenger vehicles underrode large trucks, SUVs or other high-riding passenger vehicles."
That last paragraph goes against your argument. Small offset may happen less often, but they account for the same amount of deaths and severe injuries.
-----------------------------------------------
My point is that you are WAY underestimating SMALL offset crashes...esp. when you call them "marginal" and "stupid."
|
But...but...but they still get 5 stars and have good small offset ratings lol. We agree small cars need better safety. The end.