JZiggy's "Grown Up" 4Runner Build

Updated my cabin air filter to the Tommy design (he's on Facebook)

e2HRMpv.jpg


tLFETXM.jpg


fsxUqB3.jpg


And shared a tech report on the comparison with the Russia canister-style filter I had been using. The Tommy filter is quieter, has replaceable media, and has just about the same flowrate.
 
Still (over)thinking about cabin air filters... I hate the little screws that go into the plastic to hold the fan. I'm always worried one will strip and getting them started can be a pain in the butt working upside down.

I wanted a hanger bolt to adapt the plastic / wood threaded screw into a stud. There are M5 hanger bolts at the hardware store but I had to get this one from McMaster to perfectly match the thread pitch of the OEM screws.

m3SEBkO.png


The idea is to use it along with a flange nut. The hanger bolts are a bit long. Cut and sand.

JxVm9Ki.jpg


aUk65Ov.jpg


I used the jamnut method to put them in. Not a lot of resistance which confirms that the thread pitch is a match.

lFw0SjU.jpg


LgfeRad.jpg


Now I can take the fan down much more easily by just spinning off 3 nuts! Woo! And no risk of stripping out the plastic threads from repeat installation.
 
That's a damn good idea. What are your thoughts on wing nuts for easy maintenance. You might need spacers to clear the fan housing though.

Did you use loctite on the wood screw part?
 
That's a damn good idea. What are your thoughts on wing nuts for easy maintenance. You might need spacers to clear the fan housing though.

Did you use loctite on the wood screw part?

Thanks! I did not use loctite. Once the screw bottoms it has a bit more bite and I think it will hold fine.

Sure, no reason you couldn't put wingnuts on there if you wanted. The nuts shouldn't be tightened much anyway. Like you said you'd need a spacer or something for one of them.
 
That's a damn good idea. What are your thoughts on wing nuts for easy maintenance. You might need spacers to clear the fan housing though.

Did you use loctite on the wood screw part?

Anaerobic threadlockers like Loctite can chemically attack certain types of plastics, so be careful using it on plastics. I actually did some testing at work very recently with Loctite on stainless screws into Delrin (generally an ok combo chemically) and found that it also provided zero benefit as far as breakaway or prevailing torque.

Super glue or something like Loctite 425 is a better choice for something like this, although more permanent.
 
Anaerobic threadlockers like Loctite can chemically attack certain types of plastics, so be careful using it on plastics. I actually did some testing at work very recently with Loctite on stainless screws into Delrin (generally an ok combo chemically) and found that it also provided zero benefit as far as breakaway or prevailing torque.

Super glue or something like Loctite 425 is a better choice for something like this, although more permanent.

FDA will paper you in the food industry for Anaerobic loctite contamination, not 425 kept a few bottles in shop fridge.
 
Swapped out my fan blower resistor. After 299k it had gotten pretty crispy and the lowest speed quit working. All better with a new OEM one!

y91CfJF.jpg
 
Swapped out my fan blower resistor. After 299k it had gotten pretty crispy and the lowest speed quit working. All better with a new OEM one!

y91CfJF.jpg
Do you know if the fan blower resistor will cause somewhat of a coil whine / high pitch type of sound? I have a 99' Limited with the digital controls, and I have an occasional high pitch whine that comes and goes when the fans on / turned on. Fan still works as it should but I'd like to pinpoint if it's the fan or the resistor

Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk
 
Do you know if the fan blower resistor will cause somewhat of a coil whine / high pitch type of sound? I have a 99' Limited with the digital controls, and I have an occasional high pitch whine that comes and goes when the fans on / turned on. Fan still works as it should but I'd like to pinpoint if it's the fan or the resistor

Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

I don't have digital controls so I can't speak to it. Looks like the resistor for the digital type is more expensive and is a finned aluminum style, just FYI.
 
Getting very close to the 300,000 mile mark so I decided to touch up the valve adjustment. I hadn't looked at it in a couple of years. Looks pretty good under the lid.

592rmlJ.jpg


Many of the valve tightened by half a thousandth but are still within spec. One front exhaust valve got to 10 so I put it back in the middle (12) with a new shim.

jhaF8GL.jpg


The timing chain tensioner is still at 7 teeth, like it's always been. I don't think it's changing much.

a7FrB6l.jpg
 
Getting very close to the 300,000 mile mark so I decided to touch up the valve adjustment. I hadn't looked at it in a couple of years. Looks pretty good under the lid.

592rmlJ.jpg


Many of the valve tightened by half a thousandth but are still within spec. One front exhaust valve got to 10 so I put it back in the middle (12) with a new shim.

jhaF8GL.jpg


The timing chain tensioner is still at 7 teeth, like it's always been. I don't think it's changing much.

a7FrB6l.jpg

I keep forgetting you have a 3RZ and was like "tf is this timing chain BS?!"
 
That chain looks good. Meshing great with the teeth. I wouldn't touch it either..

Sent from my SM-A536V using Tapatalk
 
[MENTION=120071]mtbtim[/MENTION] Well Timmy, to your point... I decided to do a compression check to see where I stand at 300k.

Took the vehicle for a long drive to get it nice and warm. Took off the intake and pulled the spark plugs. Unplugged the EFI fuse and the coil packs. Crank for about 5 seconds at WOT and check the gauge. Move to the next quickly.

Range was 175 - 183psi as per the Harbor Freight gauge I bought today (LOL). In the FSM the spec is 178psi with 127psi as the minimum. So I think the good ol' 3RZ is still doing pretty well!

dtLIysG.png


vOkBdxx.jpg
 
Earlier this year I was struggling with a bad oil consumption problem on our Toyota minivan. It was burning a quart of oil with each fillup very consistently. No leaks or seeps anywhere, and sometimes oily stuff would come out of the tailpipe. From what I had read it is common for the late 2000s to mid 2010s Toyota engines to have stuck rings. I experimented with a couple different flushes (stuff you add to the crankcase, run for a while, and then drain out) but it never did anything.

The guys at Bobistheoilguy.com turned me on to the idea of a piston soak procedure with Berryman B12 Chemtool. After a good soak over a couple of days the van took a solid 3 minutes of cranking to restart, belched a tremendous amount of black-blue smoke and permanently stained the concrete under the tailpipe. After that it completely stopped consuming oil and ran better than ever. I had such good success with it I thought it would be interesting to try it on the 4Runner as well.

Pull plugs, pour 2.5 oz into each cylinder, and crank it over slowly by hand to help the solvents work in and splash the backs of the valves too. Wait a few hours, and do it again a couple times. This used up two cans (less than $10). Drain the oil and filled with fresh.

After I started it the engine cranked right up and only gave a couple small puffs of whitish smoke out the tailpipe. Cardboard underneath caught a small sprinkle of black carbon soot.

Took it on a short drive then drained the oil and filled with fresh again. Drove it a couple of days and then did a proper oil change with filter. Ran perfectly without any perceptible difference.

I then tried another compression check and found that the compression went up a bit in all cylinders: 180, 193, 186, 190 psi. Was interesting that before starting it up after the soak I checked if there was residual solvent above the piston -- only piston 1 retained any (which I pulled out with a dropper) and that's also the cylinder with the lowest compression of the four.

It was interesting to see the difference between an engine with a bad carbonization problem and one without. Regardless I think it was a marginally helpful procedure.

PSA -- Do NOT run the engine without first draining out the sump with the solvent in it. After that nasty stuff goes into the oil it is NOT a lubricant anymore. You can find any number of people on YT and forums who report rod knocks after attempting to run the engine with solvent in the crankcase. Don't do it!

Thanks for reading! :whoo:
 
Earlier this year I was struggling with a bad oil consumption problem on our Toyota minivan. It was burning a quart of oil with each fillup very consistently. No leaks or seeps anywhere, and sometimes oily stuff would come out of the tailpipe. From what I had read it is common for the late 2000s to mid 2010s Toyota engines to have stuck rings. I experimented with a couple different flushes (stuff you add to the crankcase, run for a while, and then drain out) but it never did anything.



The guys at Bobistheoilguy.com turned me on to the idea of a piston soak procedure with Berryman B12 Chemtool. After a good soak over a couple of days the van took a solid 3 minutes of cranking to restart, belched a tremendous amount of black-blue smoke and permanently stained the concrete under the tailpipe. After that it completely stopped consuming oil and ran better than ever. I had such good success with it I thought it would be interesting to try it on the 4Runner as well.



Pull plugs, pour 2.5 oz into each cylinder, and crank it over slowly by hand to help the solvents work in and splash the backs of the valves too. Wait a few hours, and do it again a couple times. This used up two cans (less than $10). Drain the oil and filled with fresh.



After I started it the engine cranked right up and only gave a couple small puffs of whitish smoke out the tailpipe. Cardboard underneath caught a small sprinkle of black carbon soot.



Took it on a short drive then drained the oil and filled with fresh again. Drove it a couple of days and then did a proper oil change with filter. Ran perfectly without any perceptible difference.



I then tried another compression check and found that the compression went up a bit in all cylinders: 180, 193, 186, 190 psi. Was interesting that before starting it up after the soak I checked if there was residual solvent above the piston -- only piston 1 retained any (which I pulled out with a dropper) and that's also the cylinder with the lowest compression of the four.



It was interesting to see the difference between an engine with a bad carbonization problem and one without. Regardless I think it was a marginally helpful procedure.



PSA -- Do NOT run the engine without first draining out the sump with the solvent in it. After that nasty stuff goes into the oil it is NOT a lubricant anymore. You can find any number of people on YT and forums who report rod knocks after attempting to run the engine with solvent in the crankcase. Don't do it!



Thanks for reading! :whoo:
Thanks for sharing. I probably have stuck rings in my 2002 camry replacement engine. We lost the original engine to a seize. I really don't want to pull the engine apart and replace the piston and rings that Toyota did in later models of that engine. If I don't have to because it's probably getting fixed up and sold off. Plus, I probably will not get my money back if I rebuilt the engine due to the cost of the parts. :(

Sent from my SM-A536V using Tapatalk
 
Earlier this year I was struggling with a bad oil consumption problem on our Toyota minivan. It was burning a quart of oil with each fillup very consistently. No leaks or seeps anywhere, and sometimes oily stuff would come out of the tailpipe. From what I had read it is common for the late 2000s to mid 2010s Toyota engines to have stuck rings. I experimented with a couple different flushes (stuff you add to the crankcase, run for a while, and then drain out) but it never did anything.

The guys at Bobistheoilguy.com turned me on to the idea of a piston soak procedure with Berryman B12 Chemtool. After a good soak over a couple of days the van took a solid 3 minutes of cranking to restart, belched a tremendous amount of black-blue smoke and permanently stained the concrete under the tailpipe. After that it completely stopped consuming oil and ran better than ever. I had such good success with it I thought it would be interesting to try it on the 4Runner as well.

Pull plugs, pour 2.5 oz into each cylinder, and crank it over slowly by hand to help the solvents work in and splash the backs of the valves too. Wait a few hours, and do it again a couple times. This used up two cans (less than $10). Drain the oil and filled with fresh.

After I started it the engine cranked right up and only gave a couple small puffs of whitish smoke out the tailpipe. Cardboard underneath caught a small sprinkle of black carbon soot.

Took it on a short drive then drained the oil and filled with fresh again. Drove it a couple of days and then did a proper oil change with filter. Ran perfectly without any perceptible difference.

I then tried another compression check and found that the compression went up a bit in all cylinders: 180, 193, 186, 190 psi. Was interesting that before starting it up after the soak I checked if there was residual solvent above the piston -- only piston 1 retained any (which I pulled out with a dropper) and that's also the cylinder with the lowest compression of the four.

It was interesting to see the difference between an engine with a bad carbonization problem and one without. Regardless I think it was a marginally helpful procedure.

PSA -- Do NOT run the engine without first draining out the sump with the solvent in it. After that nasty stuff goes into the oil it is NOT a lubricant anymore. You can find any number of people on YT and forums who report rod knocks after attempting to run the engine with solvent in the crankcase. Don't do it!

Thanks for reading! :whoo:

I bet the reason it didn't do much on the 4runner is because Toyota wasn't using low tension rings back then. Sadly low tension rings are a popular way of getting increased efficiency to hit fleet efficiency regs and the result is rings get stuck a lot more, especially with the increased oil change intervals that manufacturers are touting.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,306
Messages
3,554,045
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top