Quote:
Originally Posted by tbst
The Supreme Court feels otherwise. As do I.
Michigan Dep't of State Police v. Sitz
Probable cause is a blurry subject. If a cop wants probable cause, they will get it. Not being "coherent" enough to answer basic questions from a law enforcement officer is probable cause for drinking and driving. Your call if you wanna test it. |
You're not offering anything new here. That particular case has been introduced and discussed in this thread a half dozen times. The man in the video spoke clearly, did not slur his words, nor gave the officers any reason to suspect he was intoxicated. It's funny you and the others that don't agree with me only address one portion of my arguments and neglect to acknowledge anything else mentioned. Where in the contract I have with my government does it state I must give up any of my rights so that the government can do its job to protect the citizenry as a whole?
