2004 Infiniti QX56

This explains it!

(08:33:53 July 23, 2004)
Nissan hustles engineers to U.S. to aid new-vehicle quality effort

By LINDSAY CHAPPELL AND YUZO YAMAGUCHI | Automotive News

Nissan Motor Co. has dispatched about 200 engineers from Japan to address quality problems at Nissan's new assembly plant in Canton, Miss.

The engineers also are examining Nissan's car factory in Smyrna, Tenn., a component engineering center in Farmington Hills, Mich., and an unspecified number of supplier plants.

The move comes just weeks after Nissan's dismal showing in the 2004 J.D. Power and Associates Initial Quality Study of consumer perceptions of product quality. The first three nameplates launched at Canton - the Quest minivan, Titan full-sized pickup and Pathfinder Armada SUV - each scored last in their segments.

CEO Carlos Ghosn last week addressed Canton's quality issues during the Nissan shareholders' meeting in Tokyo.

"You can't expect a new plant to start to give the same level of efficiency as other plants which are 25 years old," he told shareholders.

According to the J.D. Power study, complaints about vehicles built in Canton ranged from wind noise, loose molding and brake pedal vibration to paint chips and blemishes.

The $1.4 billion Canton plant is only a year old. It was built in just two years. The assembly plant produces four all-new models using a new work force, a new U.S. engine operation and new suppliers.

Despite the quality problems, Nissan's U.S. sales are healthy. For the first five months of 2004, combined U.S. Nissan and Infiniti sales were up 28.2 percent.

But Kunihiko Shiohara, analyst at Goldman Sachs (Japan) Ltd., is alarmed. "Nissan tapped into new segments quickly," he says. "So it seems like Nissan gave quality a second priority."
 
Link:

Forbes.com Review of QX56

Highs: Luxurious and well-appointed interior; plenty of passenger and cargo room; powerful 5.6-liter V8 engine.
Lows: Lousy fuel economy; do you really need a car this big?

Should You Buy This Car?
It's easy for a car reviewer to give advice about what cars readers should or shouldn't buy. We drive a lot of cars and don't have to commit any single one. If you're seriously shopping for a car, SUV, minivan or pickup truck, it's different. You have to give thought to not only what you like but also how well your choice will fit your life.

For example, you may want a Porsche 911 but if you've got a wife and three kids, that's probably not the most practical car for you. Of course, you can probably afford more than one car so go ahead and buy the Porsche, but some people may have needs for more practical or family-appropriate vehicles.

That being said, is the QX56 the car for you? In many ways it is five cars in one: It could be a great family car, thanks to its ample seating and optional DVD system. It could make a fine off-roader because of its powerful engine and all-wheel drive. It could make a good commercial vehicle because of its towing capacity and abundant cargo room. It could make a fine limousine because of its smooth ride and luxury trappings. And, because it looks so fine, it could be your going-out-on-Saturday-night car too.

There are only two reasons why we could see someone not wanting the QX56. The first of which is that you just may not want a car this big or fuel-hungry. As with buying dogs, you might like the idea of a Great Dane or a Newfoundland but a Golden Retriever or even a terrier might be a little easier to handle.

The other reason is that it's not "American," even though it's built in Canton, Miss. Many Americans, particularly those who might be inclined to buy large SUVs, are not inclined to send their dollars overseas even if a chunk goes to pay Mississippian factory workers.

Of course, as in most instances, it all comes down to personal choice. One buys what one is comfortable with. If you want a luxury SUV with plenty of power, space and versatility but don't want to spend $72,000 or more on a Range Rover or a Mercedes-Benz G-Class, then the QX56 could be right for you. Who knows? If enough people realize how good the QX56 really is, it could challenge the Escalade's dominance of the market after all.
 
AUTOWEEK Article

2004 Infiniti QX56
The Bold and the Not So Beautiful: Infiniti’s Monster SUV Goes Like Stink—And Looks It, Too
AUTOWEEK
Published Date: 9/27/04
LIKES
Monster power
Lots of standard features
Quiet ride

DISLIKES
Cruise, sunroof buttons not lit
Few stand-alone options
Smallish cargo space

OTHERS CONSIDERED
GMC Yukon Denali/XL
Lexus LX 470
Lincoln Navigator

We don’t forgive Infiniti’s big ute its gawky styling (nor that of its Nissan Armada sibling). The way the squared-off rear end kicks out from the bulging passenger cabin hardly endows the QX56 with a "taut, athletic stance," as claimed in Infiniti’s press materials. Rather, the crooked roof-line gives the SUV the look of a cap welded askew on the back of a pickup—which it is, sort of.

Owners, however, don’t seem to care what the big Infiniti looks like. For the most part they seem too dazzled by the SUV’s engine performance to complain about much else. Quite frankly, we are, too.

It takes the Infiniti just 7.34 seconds to reach 60 mph from a standstill, made all the more impressive given the QX56’s 5360-pound curb weight. That’s a lot of heft for any engine—even a workhorse like the QX’s 5.6-liter V8—to handle.

"This is an amazing engine that hauls this large vehicle around smartly," wrote one owner, echoing the sentiments of everyone from whom we heard.

You’ll find that same engine, only with 305 horses and 379 lb-ft of torque, under the hood of Nissan’s Titan pickup truck, on which the QX56 (and Armada) is based. In our July AutoFile on the Titan, we reported a 0-to-60-mph time of 7.53 seconds from the 341-pound-lighter pickup. Yet whatever performance the Titan might have gained in curb weight, it gives away in power: The QX56 makes use of 10 more hp and 11 more lb-ft than the Titan.


The QX56 reinforces its straight-line might down the drag strip, turning in a quarter-mile best of 15.7 seconds at 87.8 mph. That beats the Titan by 0.19 second, but the pickup catches up with the big ute down the stretch, finishing with a higher top speed of 90.9 mph.

Other makes we’ve tested, however, can’t compare.

Toyota’s Sequoia, saddled with the silky but undersized 4.7-liter V8, made the most of its 240 horses and 315 lb-ft to run 0 to 60 mph in 10.5 seconds when we tested it just over two years ago. Similarly, Ford’s Expedition managed only 9.29 seconds to 60 last year; that may change, though, as the Expedition just got 40 more horses and 15 more lb-ft of torque for ’05.

It’s not all about getting away from stoplights with the QX56, even if most owners we heard from mentioned the engine first and foremost. "The powertrain is [the QX56’s] biggest asset, followed by its luxury," said one owner. Indeed, most owners appreciate the luxury appointments that come packed in this $50k-plus SUV, notably, the rearview camera, adaptive cruise control, Bose audio system and onboard DVD entertainment system.

The Infiniti comes chock-full of standard features that cost much more in its competitors. More than that, we found the real luxury feel of the QX56 came not from all the stuff you can get in the SUV, but one thing you do without: noise.

For such a large vehicle the QX56 allows very little noise to creep into the cabin, even at speed on the highway and over rough asphalt. Our tester called it "one of the quietest rides I’ve experienced in a vehicle this size, [and] better than most cars."


We would have appreciated the same degree of attention directed at some of the interior materials. The greasy "wood" trim and the cheap, plastic control knobs take more away from the luxury experience than Infiniti seems to realize. Or some owners, for that matter.

"The interior appointments... are second to none," claimed one owner. We beg to differ.

Owners didn’t take issue with the brakes or the steering, either, though we feel those are two areas Infiniti could really improve in this mountain of a sport/ute. The brakes tended to fade quickly during testing—and we’re not talking brake testing. They started to smoke at the end of our acceleration runs and required extensive cool-down periods, after which the space required to stop the vehicle continued to grow. And the steering felt as numb as any vehicle we’ve tested this year.

Still, with as much go as this beast has got, it’s hard to argue with the QX56 if you’re in the market for two-and-a-half tons of ute.

OWNERS SAY...

My wife and I test-drove the Lincoln Navigator, GMC Yukon Denali XL and Toyota Sequoia, but we really enjoyed driving the QX56. The rearview backup camera and intelligent cruise control are nice features, and the interior is very spacious and comfortable. The interior styling feels more like the inside of a plane rather than a full-size SUV. Although my wife and I love our QX56, we wish Infiniti had installed a separate video input for the DVD player. Another speaker for the third-row passengers would also be a sound idea because it’s hard to hear the radio or a movie when you’re sitting way in the back.
Gabe dela Cruz, Aurora, Ill.

The Infiniti QX56 provides the best value in this market. We’ve owned early fuel-injected Corvettes and Hemi-powered Mopars, but this is the most impressive engine of the lot.
Paul Millen, Omaha, Neb.

Nothing in this class compares to the raw power of the QX56’s 5.6-liter V8, especially on the freeway and for passing. It also handles well, with very little pitch and roll, and trailers very well. The cabin is quiet with no rattles and squeaks, and for 12,000 miles it has been absolutely problem-free. Although this is a luxury SUV, there is never any doubt it is a brute of a truck and well prepared for any task.
Richard Harrison, Eufaula, Ala.

I needed a family vehicle that could tow my 6000-pound boat, seat six or seven passengers, and that had enough off-road capability to survive outdoor weekend excursions. The QX56 has exceeded my expectations. It has all the luxury expected of high-end SUVs, the versatility of a Chevy Suburban, and the power and utility of a Ford pickup. In the future I would like to see auto-locking doors, cellphone-ready connections, and maybe sacrifice a couple of more inches in the monstrous passenger space for more cargo room behind the third row. Just don’t touch the chassis.
Joe Pasquale, Metuchen, N.J.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,104
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top