4th Gen highway speed head on accident

08medic4x4

New member
I took these pictures from a thread on Clubsi.com, I thought it illustrated how well the 4runner held up, obviously not all the details are known.

628x471.jpg

628x471.jpg



and the source thread:
UBB Error - ClubSi
 
Register to hide this ad
Chalk up one more reason to NEVER own a mini van!!

I've always been a bit concerned with the safety on these 4R's actually. Our other vehicle is an XC90 and while I know Volvo's safety reputation is the best out there, the build quality between the two is extremely noticeable, which always concerned me a bit.

This is nice to see though, thanks for posting.
 
Very cool, definitely should give 4R drivers some piece of mind. This is one of the biggest reasons that I drive a 4R because of it's size and build quality
 
As for Mini-Vans....The IIHS tested the Toyota Sienna and determined that it was the safest passenger vehicle on the road. It did better then ANY Volvo or any other manufacturer.
 
Very cool, I just wish they'd do a test or two with a couple of our nice aftermarket winch bumpers...
 
As for Mini-Vans....The IIHS tested the Toyota Sienna and determined that it was the safest passenger vehicle on the road. It did better then ANY Volvo or any other manufacturer.

Looking at the IIHS website, it appears the Sienna is a great choice, but the ratings still weren't at the Volvo level, but, hard to tell with them being in different categories, minivan vs large SUV. Both were top safety picks in their respective categories though, which is cool.
 
Our other vehicle is an XC90 and while I know Volvo's safety reputation is the best out there, the build quality between the two is extremely noticeable, which always concerned me a bit.

Here's an interesting thing you should know about Volvo. They kind of reverse-engineer their vehicles. Here's a snippet from this article: Designing Safer Bodies The Volvo Way : Automotive Design & Production


"In creating the new S40 compact sedan, Volvo conducted virtual crash tests on prototypes without engines and then rearranged auxiliary components like batteries and brake boosters to fit the crushed engine room space, rather than designing the space to fit the existing engine configuration. By taking this unconventional approach the S40 gained 200 mm of crush space for occupants even though the vehicle's overall length was reduced by 48 mm compared with the previous model. And Broberg says of the forthcoming XC90 V8: "We went so far in demanding that a transverse-mounted V8 meet our crush requirements that we could not find an appropriate engine in the entire Ford Motor Company group that would not require us to change the packaging." So they designed a new compact 60º unit that measures only 25 in. wide to fit inside the crush envelope."
 
this is the reason that body mount under the front occupancy area is so long (sticks out so far behind the front tires) notice the mini fans tire folded up into the rocker panel causing the front occupancy space to collaps. i can deffinantly see now why all that extra metal is on the body mount.
 
This thread has me thinking a bit about the safety of these aftermarket bumpers. The crush factor is significantly less then the stock bumpers so if you do hit something, make sure its gonna be something else that crumples real well and not something too solid :D
 
Increased my already high confidence in this truck. Good call on adding the optional side impacts to the truck!!
 
@futbolking -

My 82 yo mother-in-law.....drove home from the mall and into her garage with a car looking like that...She was hit while parked at the mall. She walked up to the car from the drivers side..not seeing the other side. Drove all the way home. She thought something was wrong with the car. She called me up and said something was wrong with the car (it wasn't handling right). She still never looked at the other side of the car. I went over there and saw her car. The whole side of her car behind the front seat was demolished. The rear wheel was almost falling off. When I showed it to her...she had no idea what happened. She told me where she went. I went over to the mall and luckily it was all on security cameras. The drunk who hit her was arrested later that night for a hit and run.
 
@futbolking -

My 82 yo mother-in-law.....drove home from the mall and into her garage with a car looking like that...She was hit while parked at the mall. She walked up to the car from the drivers side..not seeing the other side. Drove all the way home. She thought something was wrong with the car. She called me up and said something was wrong with the car (it wasn't handling right). She still never looked at the other side of the car. I went over there and saw her car. The whole side of her car behind the front seat was demolished. The rear wheel was almost falling off. When I showed it to her...she had no idea what happened. She told me where she went. I went over to the mall and luckily it was all on security cameras. The drunk who hit her was arrested later that night for a hit and run.

Damn that is crazy. Glad she was in the mall when it happened. You think the interior would have be just as damaged. Curious question: Were you able to see the security tape or was a police report needed?
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,104
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top