The writer of the article claims that the T4R being built there makes sense because the Tacoma and T4R share the same BOF. They don’t, so the article is flawed based on that assumption.
I came on here to point that out as well:
"which shares the Tacoma’s body-on-frame platform"
I was pretty sure that they did not share the same platform. The only thing they share is that they are both "body-on-frame" designs.
With one bad piece of evidence, shared platform making for ease of building both in the same plant, it does call the entire article in to question. Now, if the 6th gen moves to be Tacoma based...well...I'm glad I bought my 5th Gen and in the future looks like I'll be checking out Lexus GXs.
I've always wondered, while I know the 4Runner isn't just for the US Market, it seems like the Prado exists almost everywhere else and the US is the main 4Runner market (per wikipedia - "As of 2014, the 4Runner is sold in the United States, Canada, Central America, Bahamas, Ecuador, Peru, and Chile.")
Have we been lucky that they HAVEN'T gone to a shared platform with the Tacoma up to this point? Could that luck end with the 6th Gen?