A dinosaur still roams the Earth.

I recently spent 3 days on the White Rim trail in Canyonlands. Out of about 20 other vehicles we saw on the trip, the overwhelming majority were 4runners. The rest were Tacomas, FJ Cruisers, and a few 4-door Wranglers, plus an occasional NPS Jeep. No Rav4s, TrailHawks, LR's, Pathfinders, Ford/Chevy pickups, not even a Subu Outback.

There's no better vehicle for this kind of overlanding. However, Toyota can't make a living selling 4runners to overlanders. My concern about reviews like this is it will hasten the end of one of the greatest vehicle concepts ever created and executed.

"Overlanding." I hate this term. 100%.

I agree - Toyota would not make much money selling to "overlanders" but they sell them as fast as they roll them off the transporter here to people who like to ride the North GA forest service roads, folks who go "four wheeling", or other folks who just really like the utilitarian usefulness and good looks of the vehicle.


Overlanding is totally the crossfit of the vehicle world.

Crossfit-isnt-a.jpg
 
I've always wondered how many people who complain about the 4Runner's age, would be able to afford it if was as "modern" as all its uni-bodied "competitors" ha? Food for thought...
 
My Dinosaur needs genetic engineering

From a new 4runner owner, after having owned several jeeps, I can say I researched my options and after toooooo many mechanical problems with my last jeep the higher reliability 4r owners get made my decision easy: I found nothing like my dinosaur 2017 4runner tep out there.

With that said, I think my dinosaur needs genetic engineering to make it modern. I would only say it needs A) a V8 engine (at least, as an option again), B) a dedicated trans cooler (for towing), C) a 6-8 speed transmission, D) push button start (these devices called keys are just antique), E) not as wimpy an alternator (high output might be to expensive base price but the stock unit is just too wimpy for all the modern tech devices that need charging) and F) white 5k+ LED bulbs (option at least - nothing looks older than a yellow interior light).

Everyone will have their list of personal options afterwards, such as leveling and lifting it 3 inches, etc etc etc.. but A-F is the least # of changes that would modernize the 4R for 99% of the buyers that will want exactly what the 4R is but find it's been stagnant or lacked innovation over the last few years.

The choice of interior materials and even the wimpy alternator can be explained as cost cutting to keep the price down, that's fair, it's not bad for the price; but at least the option of A-F for those that want it.
 
From a new 4runner owner, after having owned several jeeps, I can say I researched my options and after toooooo many mechanical problems with my last jeep the higher reliability 4r owners get made my decision easy: I found nothing like my dinosaur 2017 4runner tep out there.

With that said, I think my dinosaur needs genetic engineering to make it modern. I would only say it needs A) a V8 engine (at least, as an option again), B) a dedicated trans cooler (for towing), C) a 6-8 speed transmission, D) push button start (these devices called keys are just antique), E) not as wimpy an alternator (high output might be to expensive base price but the stock unit is just too wimpy for all the modern tech devices that need charging) and F) white 5k+ LED bulbs (option at least - nothing looks older than a yellow interior light).

Everyone will have their list of personal options afterwards, such as leveling and lifting it 3 inches, etc etc etc.. but A-F is the least # of changes that would modernize the 4R for 99% of the buyers that will want exactly what the 4R is but find it's been stagnant or lacked innovation over the last few years.

The choice of interior materials and even the wimpy alternator can be explained as cost cutting to keep the price down, that's fair, it's not bad for the price; but at least the option of A-F for those that want it.

While I hear you, there is a logical argument to be made regarding the lack of constant changes and innovation in correlation to the dependability, workmanship, and lack of issues.
 
It might not be cutting edge, but neither is a Colt 1911 or the AK platform and they seem to sell fine.

From someone that has handled many different firearms platforms, I'll speak to that topic. It takes allot of engineering and effort to make an AR platform run as reliable as an AK; I personally have used super slick gas piston ARs that reach or surpass the same reliability with even less maintenance than an AK. However, it's much easier to strip the furniture off any AK and modernize that dino into a pseudo modular platform (i.e. 2012+ version) because the reliability is the base layer it can do anything.

There will be buyers/users of anything out there, as everyone's priorities differ. For instance, I personally prefer a Glock over a 1911 and it's a toss up between a modern AK and a gas piston AR that's been tuned right, but I don't have any regrets picking a 4R: it fits the specs required for the role or exact mission.
 
Man, I think it's awesome that they don't change those things.

I'd rather see an option for a non touchscreen radio and rubber floors. They make the Limited trim for folks that want all the fancy trinkets.



A) a V8 engine (at least, as an option again)
The V8 in the GX:
300hp
329lbft
15/18mpg
The V6 in the 4R:
270hp
278lbft
17/21mpg

I'd still take the V6 for the better mpg.


B) a dedicated trans cooler (for towing),
Have there been trans overheating issues if you're towing within spec?

C) a 6-8 speed transmission,
Why?

D) push button start (these devices called keys are just antique),
Available on Limited

E) not as wimpy an alternator (high output might be to expensive base price but the stock unit is just too wimpy for all the modern tech devices that need charging)
What in the world are you charging that overloads your alternator?

F) white 5k+ LED bulbs (option at least - nothing looks older than a yellow interior light)
The ultimate night vision killer. I hate the bright blue interior as it is. Looks really cool but a huge negative if you're trying to preserve the ability to see better in the dark.
 
I've always wondered how many people who complain about the 4Runner's age, would be able to afford it if was as "modern" as all its uni-bodied "competitors" ha? Food for thought...

I think you'd be looking at a $50k SUV. Heck, look at the price of the Land Cruiser; granted it's much larger, but the price is insane on it. I've always thought of the 4Runner as Land Cruiser quality (with close capability) in a smaller, less costly package.
 
I've had CRV, Pilot, Sienna, Acadia, and Outback. I have a 17 SR5 Premium now, and I don't miss anything from the other cars. I don't get the outdated interior criticism. It's not as nice as the Acadia inside, but it's not a major step down. The five speed might be outdated, but I got pretty sick of the slingshot CVT's. The people that review these cars cannot comprehend that there are people out there that don't want their "SUV's" built on a Camry platform. This is different from the Crossovers, and that's the point.
 
I think you'd be looking at a $50k SUV. Heck, look at the price of the Land Cruiser; granted it's much larger, but the price is insane on it. I've always thought of the 4Runner as Land Cruiser quality (with close capability) in a smaller, less costly package.
Exactly, I see the 4runner as a small land cruiser.

With the small amount of 4runner they sold in Canada, they won't give us the Landcruiser anytime soon.
 
Why then is it in the Lexus GX? That's literally just a 4Runner with different body panels.

That's a good question. For starters, Lexus is a luxury brand. One would expect to pay more and I believe a V8 would provide a smoother ride in comparison to a V6. The vast majority of consumers are hyper sensitive to MPG and the EPA has the 2025 mandate that 2022-2025 model year vehicle emission rules requiring average fleet-wide efficiency of 54.5 miles per gallon. Not sure if Lexus falls underneath Toyota when it comes to determining what a "fleet" is. What I do know is that an optional V8 back in the 4Runner lineup is counterintuitive. I'd love a V8 in my TE. But it won't happen with where America is going. I mean, look at what is happening to the V6. And we think we are getting the V8 back ha?
 
I've had CRV, Pilot, Sienna, Acadia, and Outback. I have a 17 SR5 Premium now, and I don't miss anything from the other cars. I don't get the outdated interior criticism. It's not as nice as the Acadia inside, but it's not a major step down. The five speed might be outdated, but I got pretty sick of the slingshot CVT's. The people that review these cars cannot comprehend that there are people out there that don't want their "SUV's" built on a Camry platform. This is different from the Crossovers, and that's the point.

:thanks:
 
40k for 20 years

My brother bought my niece a 99 limited 4x4 for her first car last year. When that vehicle was new it stickered for 40k nearly 20 years ago. My sr5 premium 4x4 has all of those features (yeah fake leather and no locker) and is still only 40k in 2018. Factoring inflation into the equation the 4Runner is an amazing bargain for what we get. This thing is worth 40k all day in 2018 regardless of what the Corolla comes equipped with. BTW, how much did a corolla sell for in 99? Anyone?
 
Man, I think it's awesome that they don't change those things.

Understood, opinions are like [beep], everyone has one. Mine is no more important or better than anyone else, some things are best left unchanged, but then again I don't see many people with 8track tapes anymore.

I'd rather see an option for a non touchscreen radio and rubber floors.
An option, wouldn't hurt, but the number of consumers choosing that might be too limited for them to even break even on the tooling, training and materials just to offer it. But husky and weather tech make a killing on the rubber floor mats, so perhaps that might prove to be worth considering

They make the Limited trim for folks that want all the fancy trinkets.

Yes but the limited doesn't have a good portion of features in the TRD/TRDPrem/TRDPro trims.


A) a V8 engine (at least, as an option again)
The V8 in the GX:
300hp
329lbft
15/18mpg
The V6 in the 4R:
270hp
278lbft
17/21mpg

The v8 was an option in earlier editions, keep the 6 as std and leave it as an option; or redesign that v6, it just feels like the HP is lacking when hauling at low rpm. I'm lucky to get 14-15mpg in the V6, without hauling anything, mpg isn't a priority for me (or some others) as much as powerful enough to be smooth when hp counts. When in farm country and everyone is nice+friendly, it's great, but in city driving getting on a highway onramp it feels a little heavy to beat the grumpy idiots on the road. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy with the 4R and I'd make the purchase again, but it's pretty heavy gross weight for a v6.

I'd still take the V6 for the better mpg.

That's perfectly fine, everyone has their preference. Drop a few hundred lbs of the gross weight and the mpg will be even better. Maybe a hemi type would be the solution for everyone to be happy; or didn't Ford do something with the raptor to boost the hp and downsize to a 6? IDK but it feels like a magnuson supercharger is in order but those prices and the fuel restrictions are a no-go.

B) a dedicated trans cooler (for towing),
Have there been trans overheating issues if you're towing within spec?
Short trips it's perfectly fine hauling anything, a few atvs or a trailer a few miles is nothing, but long trips anywhere near tow capacity makes it work much harder. It takes 6-10 hours driving from the keys to transit FL alone (i.e. 6hrs from Tampa to Hurlburt field, 7hrs key largo to kings bay, etc...). Aftermarket coolers are cheap and easy to install, but feels like a no brainier to be standard with the tow pkg.

C) a 6-8 speed transmission,
Why?
it would offset / increase the mpg and would allow for a smoother transition at certain speeds. I've felt the trans want to shift more often, even just 1 extra gear would help.


D) push button start (these devices called keys are just antique),
Available on Limited

Exactly, so why not an option on the SR5 Prem, TRD, TRD Prem, TRD Pro, etc.. It might just be me, but I've bent keys in my pocket while at the range (insert other physical activity)... nothing like going to turn the key and your key looks like an L shaped allen wrench.

IMHO, the limited is not really the spirit of the 4R roughed practicality, it's more of the "wanna-be-gangsta" papi chulo venezuelan types with money that want the bling bling / rims / etc and the trophy wife: might as well go for a lexus or something else.

p.s. the trophy wife will probably cheat on him with the 4R TRD owner instead... :brushteeth:


E) not as wimpy an alternator (high output might be to expensive base price but the stock unit is just too wimpy for all the modern tech devices that need charging)
What in the world are you charging that overloads your alternator?

It adds up: mobile phone, sat phone, xfr laptop, gps, dash cam, HIDs, lightbars, etc.. use a winch and you end up with a drained battery sooner or later.. even with a dual battery or a 31M you'd still have to mount solar panels to a roof rack just to compensate, let alone run a small arb type fridge.


F) white 5k+ LED bulbs (option at least - nothing looks older than a yellow interior light)
The ultimate night vision killer. I hate the bright blue interior as it is. Looks really cool but a huge negative if you're trying to preserve the ability to see better in the dark.

True, but unless I'm missing something, most interior bulbs have a off/on/int switch; perhaps my natural biological night vision isn't as good nowadays but if it is a concern you can leave those leds off and use a streamlight sidewinder in red mode when you observe light discipline. Of course, a dual PVS-14 and some exterior IR LEDs take care of vision concerns. But most of the time, tossing around tools, bags, pelican cases and stuff (insert misc object) in the back seat or cargo area requires bright white led light sometimes.

Either way, I think everyone here appreciates the niche that the 4R fills when every other mfg has gone for the unibody fake suv (camry frame and suv body) offerings.
 
Just another 3 letter alphabet soup agency that needs to be disbanded.

Maybe. Regardless, they are at the forefront of making engines smaller and more efficient. Never been a fan of that trend.

Yep, there's an informed opinion.

That said, how about a supercharger for the existing V6?

It's a good option to have and one I'm sure several people would jump at. I'd be somewhat hesitant just because I don't want to lose the reliability the OEM V6 engine offers.

I think you'd be looking at a $50k SUV. Heck, look at the price of the Land Cruiser; granted it's much larger, but the price is insane on it. I've always thought of the 4Runner as Land Cruiser quality (with close capability) in a smaller, less costly package.

I hear you. And with that price point, no way I'd buy a $4Runner new. I'd look to the entry-level GX or Sequoia to get more bang for my buck.
 
Yep, there's an informed opinion.

That said, how about a supercharger for the existing V6?

There is a thread here about ?magnuson? I've seen some photos and videos, if it's anything like the tacomas, it is nice. however, the price tag and the extra fuel restrictions once you install it, are serious drawbacks to the mod. Moreover, it may void any chance of warranty service on the engine/drivetrain/etc; so for most people that means 3 yrs of ownership before they even consider it.

If the changes mean that instead of going to the stealership with a cert check for $39k and driving off the lot I'd just finance the extra 5-10k but get the extra HP and keep the factory warranty, I think it's worth it. But 3k+ aftermarket with the risk of the trans falling out later on and eating the repair cost, is concerning. Of course, I'm familiar with the q/c junk american mfgs produce nowadays and that may skew my perception, affect my risk aversion and cause me to mitigate mods unnecessarily (with toyotas). I wont name names but my last american brand vehicle required repairs 2 weeks into ownership (and throughout first 6+ years): starter motor 3x (in first 3 years), replacing transmission, trans cooler, rear diff seals, power steering pump, radiator, alternator, battery 3x, 4x4 case, exhaust manifold, 3 eng mounts, power windows 5x, washer fluid res and pump, etc etc etc -> on the bright sight the toe hitch was still good and leather seats were still comfy and like new (when I sold it)...

so far, so good with the 4R. Let me know if the supercharger drops in price in the next few years.
 
I just prefer my vehicles as simple as possible. The only things I'd say are must-haves are fuel injection, air conditioning and a stereo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like an FJ62 is your vehicle. I love the older LC's.

My 97 4Runner with 4-banger, manual trannie, ARB + winch makes me smile when I'm in the backwoods of Maine, but I like the safety enhancements of the 5th gen for driving kids around...
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,120
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top