Ok everyone, not sure how many people have followed the Troy A. Davis saga, but it really makes me question if America is really the best country. I also am beginning to question my decision to practice law as a result of this.
Any justice system is inherently flawed because humans will make mistakes. This is why, although as heart breaking as it is I can understand and cope with people wrongfully convicted. There is nothing that can be done to prevent this, although systems can be instituted to minimize this risk.
What I do have a problem with and cannot comprehend for the life of me is why when a man is convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death why nothing is done to stop/delay the execution when credible evidence is presented suggesting that the conviction at trial was severely flawed. I have taken the time to read through the majority of court testimony and documents and what is clear is that a man was convicted of murder almost entirely based on witness testimony and that 7 out of 9 of the witnesses recanted their testimony and offered sworn affidativis that they were coerced into giving false testimony. Of the two remaining witnesses one of them is a potential suspect. Does this prove Mr. Davis is innocent; no it does not. However, if the state of GA did not have the original testimony of the witnesses that recanted their would not have been sufficient evidence to reach the conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. What did the state gain by executing Mr. Davis the evening of 9/21? The answer is nothing, but added hatred (and rightfully so) from our allies.
The solution was simple. The GA courts, GA governor, or the US Supreme Court could have and should have unquestionably issued a stay of execution until further investigation could have been done because chances are an innocent man was put to death by the government. However, Supreme Court Justice Scalia believes the finality of a court judgment (hear the death sentence order) is more important than mercy. Well we are not talking about mercy we are talking about taking the time to seek the truth to prevent a miscarriage of justice.
:ybrick:
Any justice system is inherently flawed because humans will make mistakes. This is why, although as heart breaking as it is I can understand and cope with people wrongfully convicted. There is nothing that can be done to prevent this, although systems can be instituted to minimize this risk.
What I do have a problem with and cannot comprehend for the life of me is why when a man is convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death why nothing is done to stop/delay the execution when credible evidence is presented suggesting that the conviction at trial was severely flawed. I have taken the time to read through the majority of court testimony and documents and what is clear is that a man was convicted of murder almost entirely based on witness testimony and that 7 out of 9 of the witnesses recanted their testimony and offered sworn affidativis that they were coerced into giving false testimony. Of the two remaining witnesses one of them is a potential suspect. Does this prove Mr. Davis is innocent; no it does not. However, if the state of GA did not have the original testimony of the witnesses that recanted their would not have been sufficient evidence to reach the conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. What did the state gain by executing Mr. Davis the evening of 9/21? The answer is nothing, but added hatred (and rightfully so) from our allies.
The solution was simple. The GA courts, GA governor, or the US Supreme Court could have and should have unquestionably issued a stay of execution until further investigation could have been done because chances are an innocent man was put to death by the government. However, Supreme Court Justice Scalia believes the finality of a court judgment (hear the death sentence order) is more important than mercy. Well we are not talking about mercy we are talking about taking the time to seek the truth to prevent a miscarriage of justice.
:ybrick:
Last edited: