Falken Rocky Mountain ATS

The BFGs look way meaner IMO. The big question here since im from the rainy state of Washington is how would you rate the Falkens and BFGs in the rain and on pavement? I want an aggressive looking tire that is nice on the road as i travel 70+ miles a day but i also want something that is good in snow and for some light off roading.
 
I can chime in on this. I have about 12k on my rocky mountains and they are currently at 11/32. Mild off roading, snow, rain, mud and pretty much anything but sand. They perform pretty well. Haven't gotten stuck yet. Not so hot in the snow though, but they work. I'm interested to see if they will last me 50k.
 
I have driven 10k miles on my RM ATS and I really like all aspects of these tires; more than adequate dry, wet and snow traction with a super quiet ride. Could they be more aggresive looking sure but they work for me but I think you'd loose the quietness. You would receive a thumbs up from me.

Recently in MPLS we had a heavy wet snow and the highway was heavily puddled with areas of slush, impressively my 4R never hydroplaned. I will say I'm not sure if the lack of hydroplaning has all to do with the current tread depth (10k on a 50k warrant tire) or tread design.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,083
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top