Brick Sprickly
New member
if you don't think the increase in cost of fuel, be it from over-regulation or taxation, has no bearing on Toyotas plans for the 4R, then you might want to re-think that.
That seems related, but none of the other posts are.
if you don't think the increase in cost of fuel, be it from over-regulation or taxation, has no bearing on Toyotas plans for the 4R, then you might want to re-think that.
Based on 18.4 cents per gallon, I pay roughly $116 per year in gas taxes (12,000 miles, 19 MPG=631 gallons, 631 x .184 = 116-ish). If it doubled to .36 per gallon, I would pay $227 a year. $111 a year. Perspective please.
Based on 18.4 cents per gallon, I pay roughly $116 per year in gas taxes (12,000 miles, 19 MPG=631 gallons, 631 x .184 = 116-ish). If it doubled to .36 per gallon, I would pay $227 a year. $111 a year. Perspective please.
What are you going to do when they (and you know who they are) decide to raise your income tax by 20% or 30% or 50%? Or maybe start with other tax increases so people will follow your idea?
I've always said that the USA should open borders to anyone, just do not allow any form of govt assistance or voting rights to them until they go through the citizenship process. Enforce ID's, if they are not forced to work under the table, companies can't get rich by artifically pushing wages down for citizens. It creates the even playing field sought after by political gasbags.They already did. That awesome new tax "reform" that benefitted corporations and rich people has me paying another $2-3k in taxes every year.
And I'm not wealthy by any stretch.
Taxes serve a purpose. But what's screwed up is who ends up paying the bulk of them. A hint: it's NOT the people who can afford to make big campaign contributions.
And speaking of those kinds of people...
In a former lifetime, I used to work immigration violations. A border "wall" stopping illegal immigration is a promise almost as empty as shampoo that miraculously grows hair on bald men, or an email from an attorney in Nigeria who can make you rich if you help him out with a "small processing fee ." .
It's a promise used by xenophobic politicians to folks who don't know any better.
Illegal immigration will continue as long as there are jobs for the illegals. And there will always be jobs when there are little or no consequences for the people who pay them. Why are there no consequences, you ask?
Excellent question. Because the CEO's, business owners, and wealthy stockholders make big campaign donations. And those they contribute money to end up putting political weight on the agencies charged with enforcing the law.
The way it used to work (and it's similar now, but the agency names and some of the terminology are different) was simple. If too many illegals start crossing and maybe there are a few high-profile crimes in the news, the political talking heads will tell us all that they're going to "get tough" on illegals and will tell the agencies to start hitting the meat plants, factories, etc. Then, when we started taking away their labor (even though it was always temporary), the companies start whining and the reins are pulled back.
I actually saw this happen: the INS investigations office in Bloomington, MN was in a big building with multiple tenants (not the federal building). There was a company contracted by building management to do the cleaning at night. It usually ended up that some of their employees were illegal. When the agency was told to "get tough," they'd round up people from their own building's cleaning crew. Otherwise, they let them be. It wasn't the law that dictated whether or not the cleaning guy could stay and work. It was politics. And while the owner of the cleaning company was probably not the kind of guy to have any influence, you can imagine the kinds of influence that DID come into play when you have politically-induced selective enforcement of the law (or don't) across the entire country.
So the only consequences were for the illegals, themselves. They got sent back, but were not criminally prosecuted or even "deported," per se. They were "Voluntarily Returned." By agreeing to go home on Uncle Sam's dime, they avoided criminal liability.
And they were back inside a month, anyway. If you want to make an illegal immigrant's day, arrest him inside the Hormel meat plant where he's working - in Minnesota, and in February - and tell him he's getting a free plane ride back to Mexico or Central America. A little vacation in the sun and, once he can feel his toes again, he's back.
So the entire "build a wall" campaign promise was probably the dumbest one I've seen in my lifetime.
Just going to throw this out there.....the destruction of America began on January 20 2021.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've always said that the USA should open borders to anyone, just do not allow any form of govt assistance or voting rights to them until they go through the citizenship process. Enforce ID's, if they are not forced to work under the table, companies can't get rich by artifically pushing wages down for citizens. It creates the even playing field sought after by political gasbags.
How would they track miles driven to tax you? Would they have an IRS agent look at your car every year or would this be based on the honor system, like every other utopian fallacy? No way should the fed track our actual vehicles. That would mean they could find us at any given moment.
I don’t think I’ll ever understand why someone would be for paying additional taxes. They get enough from us as it is. Why always more, more, more? At least we got a bit of a break on income taxes for a few years. As for tax by mile, I think that’s because electric cars don’t use fuel. Gotta tax them somehow, right? Maybe tax electricity once there are enough EVs.
Can there be some kind of a rebate for driving an older vehicle? Reason being that you are not contributing to the environmental cost of putting one in a junk yard and creating a new one. I think the value of that is rarely, if ever, taken into consideration.
Sure, auto manufacturers and the supply chain upstream do not benefit but if the cause is truly for the environment, why can't we attack from another angle?