PaulsTrail
New member
Seems like it could be a neat vehicle if it met one's needs, but to me (being old enough to remember and have experience with the car of the same name), that name carries too much baggage.There might be a good reason why I don’t work in marketing, but I think it’s a bad idea for Ford to use the Maverick name for a truck. I don’t have fond memories of the Maverick car, so I wouldn’t use the Maverick name for anything.
Dodge reintroduced the Dart, and to me it bears no resemblance to the Dart of the 60’s and 70’s.
My parents bought the blue one below in 1969, just as they came out. 200 CID 6-cylinder, 3 on the tree, vinyl bench seats and no air conditioning. My brother got the first shot at it, and after he'd beaten the hell out of it, I took it to college in the fall of 1972. Actually had a lot of fun with that car and it took a ton of abuse without too much complaint. Ended up selling it in 1976 for $150 and bought a new 1976 Honda Civic.
My parents bought the yellow one pictured below in 1973, trading in their 1968 Mustang on it. You can see the old blue one in the background. It was the so-called luxury model, with a 302 V8 and an automatic. My mother's car. Got terrible gas mileage and had a lot of mechanical problems. I once drag-raced a friend's 4-cylinder Mercury Capri with it and lost. I liked the old one a lot better, even through it was a pretty much a strippo and had been run through the ringer by the time I got it.
Anyway, sort of fond memories; but I'd have a hard time getting over that name on a new vehicle now.
Attachments
Last edited: