Pyral
Member
Seeing this makes me believe Toyota just doesn't respect the 4runner name.
The 4runner ruled its segment for 30 years, and was going steady despite being forgotten about for the last 15 years. And despite this, Toyota bumped it in favor of the Land Cruiser name.
The Land Cruiser was a total wild card. They could have made it into anything: Wrangler competitor with front SA, a bronco competitor with a removable roof, or a 70 series like thing that would offer van like space with 4x4 capability.
Instead of fixing the obvious gaps in their SUV lineup, Toyota put the Land Cruiser in the one segment that didn't need changes, the 4runner's segment. Even worse, the way they've done it, they demoted the 4runner because it's extremely similar while being based on a less premium vehicle.
And I know that the new Tacoma, Tundra, and Sequoia have lost metal skid plates on all but the off road trims. And the 4runner will likely continue this. So this better be a lot cheaper for it to make sense. Especially if it's made in Mexico.
The 4runner ruled its segment for 30 years, and was going steady despite being forgotten about for the last 15 years. And despite this, Toyota bumped it in favor of the Land Cruiser name.
The Land Cruiser was a total wild card. They could have made it into anything: Wrangler competitor with front SA, a bronco competitor with a removable roof, or a 70 series like thing that would offer van like space with 4x4 capability.
Instead of fixing the obvious gaps in their SUV lineup, Toyota put the Land Cruiser in the one segment that didn't need changes, the 4runner's segment. Even worse, the way they've done it, they demoted the 4runner because it's extremely similar while being based on a less premium vehicle.
And I know that the new Tacoma, Tundra, and Sequoia have lost metal skid plates on all but the off road trims. And the 4runner will likely continue this. So this better be a lot cheaper for it to make sense. Especially if it's made in Mexico.