Hitman
New member
For me the 4Runner sits half way between the Bronco/Wrangler and Jeep GC. Toyota doesn't build a direct competitor in either of those two segments. Nor does Jeep or Ford sell a 4Runner competitor in the USA market. Ford does build and sell the Everest that is pretty similar to a 4Runner segment globally. But not in the USA. I don't think anything globally in the Jeep world is similar. In my view the closest direct competitor to the Wrangler in the toyota corporate umbrella is the Subaru outback. It's very similar structurally.
Anyway - 4Runner overlaps the jeep/bronco market. I think this moves the needle that way with 35's fitting stock and 37's being pretty easy to bolt on.
I do think Toyota is missing the "fun" part of the market without any removeable top. That's what really separates the Bronco and Wrangler from all others.
I also think the 4R will out perform the Bronco offroad in some conditions. The rear suspension is significantly superior on the 4Runner. The coilover design on the Bronco is a real bummer. It effectively eliminates the benefit of a solid axle while keeping most of the negatives. To maximize the benefits of a solid axle the springs need to be inboard and shocks ideally put outboard as far as possible. Toyota's rear axle coil design is better. Wrangler is also similar to the Toyota design. I think a 4Runner with 37s will be pretty comparable to the Bronco or Wrangler on the trails overall.
A Grand Cherokee Trailhawk is as good or even better than a 4Runner offroad. The Grand Cherokee Traihawk doesn't have a solid rear axle, but it has standard air suspension that gives it a big advantage.