R&P Safari vs OEM

SnowLizard

New member
New R&P options, which is better Safari vs OEM or something else

I'm looking to replace my Rack and Pinion once... until it too turns 10yrs and starts to leak.

I'm looking at Safari or OEM... I've heard and read about the re-man's that most fail, even with lifetime (lifetime of self labor) so I've ruled those out. I want new.

What would you get?

.... my R&P is leaking into the ITR boots both sides, not alot, but enough. it is 'tight' feeling and no slop. thinking it will probably last another year easily, but just wanted to decide ahead of time of what R&P I wanted. I'm leaning towards OEM, but have heard great things about safari. Intended use of the truck is off road exploration, mostly grated roads, air'd down 265 tires (some day 285's) and my DD. I want something that can take abuse, well really rough roads. currently my power steering is poop brown color, I thought it was supposed to be red.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
bump, anyone? any experience...

I don't think you can get OEM anymore. If you go to the dealer, I think they sell you a Toyota Reman rack, which are known to leak. I bought a Safari Rack a year ago or so and it has held up for 20k miles without issue. And a lot of those miles have been hard off-road miles. I even hit a 3 foot ditch at 45 and nothing happened. A guy behind me in a long travel Silverado shattered his rack on the same bump!

For daily driving use, there is no way you would have a problem with the Safari rack.
 
Yeah, if you've read any of the threads around here, you pretty much know the opinions here, not really anything new anyone can bring to this thread. You ask what would you get? Well, lots of us have posted what we did get. Go read those threads, there's nothing more that say than what we actually spend our hard earned money on, that's better than any opinion.

FWIW I used a Napa rack and have around 20k on it as well with no problems.

And yes, your fluid should be red. If it's brown, change it.

And if you're leaking, then you probably don't have a year, it will tend to go quicker once it starts going.
 
I don't think you can get OEM anymore. If you go to the dealer, I think they sell you a Toyota Reman rack, which are known to leak.

Actually they're new now. Bought mine last year so I can't tell you if it'll last or not nor can I say if they're better, the same as or worse than Safari. Seems it's this number for all the 3rd gens now, and they come with the solid guide.

Part Number 44250-35042
Part Name GEAR ASSY
It cost me around $550 shipped July 2014
P8014117_zps2aa915e4.jpg~original


What I can say about the oe rack is to replace the mount bushings straight off, at least if lifted/bigger tires. Save yourself pulling the rack a few months later- the rubber ones it comes with can't handle the strain. Looked like it was being held on with rubber bands when turning the wheel.
 
Thanks for all the replies, I've been reading many posts, and they say different things depending on age of post, example in this post there's Safari/Napa/Dealer... I posted my question 'which one to get' as reputation/quality on each maker can change from time to time... and if there were issues with one or the other that I wasn't aware of, I wanted to avoid... like the OE bushings

Nelsonmd said:
....FWIW I used a Napa rack and have around 20k on it as well with no problems.

And yes, your fluid should be red. If it's brown, change it.

And if you're leaking, then you probably don't have a year, it will tend to go quicker once it starts going.
guess stop leak probably won't help either, good to know on the NAPA, there were 3rd runner up on my list, but still leaning towards safari...

habanero said:
What I can say about the oe rack is to replace the mount bushings straight off, at least if lifted/bigger tires. Save yourself pulling the rack a few months later- the rubber ones it comes with can't handle the strain. Looked like it was being held on with rubber bands when turning the wheel
what type of bushing did you replace it with, polyurethane?

4Running Daily said:
I bought a Safari Rack a year ago or so and it has held up for 20k miles without issue. And a lot of those miles have been hard off-road miles. I even hit a 3 foot ditch at 45 and nothing happened.
now that right there say's a lot, how is your bushing holding up?

thank you all for the replies, I'll add Safari to plans/budget.
 
Thanks for all the replies, I've been reading many posts, and they say different things depending on age of post, example in this post there's Safari/Napa/Dealer... I posted my question 'which one to get' as reputation/quality on each maker can change from time to time... and if there were issues with one or the other that I wasn't aware of, I wanted to avoid... like the OE bushings


guess stop leak probably won't help either, good to know on the NAPA, there were 3rd runner up on my list, but still leaning towards safari...


what type of bushing did you replace it with, polyurethane?


now that right there say's a lot, how is your bushing holding up?

thank you all for the replies, I'll add Safari to plans/budget.


Bushings still look great! Safari customer service is probably the best I've ever dealt with. Can't say the same for Toyota
 
I recently received a quote for a rack from Safari. $495 + 35-50 bucks for shipping. I am going to be replacing the LBJs,ITREs and OTREs soon . I already have the rack bushing kit from Wheelers. I only want to replace the rack once. I am seriously considering the Safari rack.
 
I recently received a quote for a rack from Safari. $495 + 35-50 bucks for shipping. I am going to be replacing the LBJs,ITREs and OTREs soon . I already have the rack bushing kit from Wheelers. I only want to replace the rack once. I am seriously considering the Safari rack.

The Safari rack comes with ITRE's already installed. Do it!
 
I recently received a quote for a rack from Safari. $495 + 35-50 bucks for shipping. I am going to be replacing the LBJs,ITREs and OTREs soon . I already have the rack bushing kit from Wheelers. I only want to replace the rack once. I am seriously considering the Safari rack.

Hmm for just a little more you can go OEM. The OEM ITRE's are around $125 each by themselves. $550 for a new OEM IMO would be worth the extra cost.
 
are Safari's ITR's OEM quality? or has others needed to replace those?

I'd imagine they are OEM quality.

Yes they are. At least according to Safari they are.

Ive been running the Safari rack for just over 5k miles now, and heres what I can tell you.

The difference between the Safari rack and every other brand (including oem) is in the internal bushings. The oem rack, along with every other rack out there most likely, includes nylon polymer bushings, while the Safari rack has brass bushings I believe. This is why they claim their rack is stronger, and should last longer. These would be the main bushings that slide horizontally within the rack as you turn it. Basically, brass bushings will resist corrosion from that friction better than nylon, and will maintain their tolerance longer.

I can tell you that the rack is fantastic so far. Its very tight, so much so that the wheels struggle to return to straight on their own when you let go of the steering wheel after going around a turn. I have to force the steering wheel to get the wheels pointing straight again. Over bumps the rack does not allow the wheels to pull at all. They just point exactly where you direct them. I had a crappy remanufactured oem rack (actually went through 2 of them, plus the original rack) before installing the Safari. So I cant compare this rack to a brand new Toyota rack. But I can tell you the rack made the single most noticeable improvement in handling of all the front end parts Ive changed, by far. It was a WORLD of difference from the two remanufactured racks I tried.

I would recommend doing it right the first time. Go with the Safari

Edit: One more valuable piece of info - the Safari rack is brand new, not remanufactured. I asked them about that before purchasing the rack, and they ensured it
 
Last edited:
Yes they are. At least according to Safari they are....
Its very tight, so much so that the wheels struggle to return to straight on their own when you let go of the steering wheel after going around a turn. I have to force the steering wheel to get the wheels pointing straight again. Over bumps the rack does not allow the wheels to pull at all. They just point exactly where you direct them.
awesome, still planning on going safari...

Sounds like you have a memory steering issue, there's no reason you should have to 'force' your car to turn straight after a turn. I've had that on my 65 mustang until I loosed the steering box.

How to: Replace steering rack guide- Pictures - YotaTech Forums
I tightened it up until it was 'tight' then backed it off a quarter turn. The torque spec is (18ft.lbs then back it off 19deg), but I don't have a wrench here that will measure that low, so basically if its too lose, you will notice that the slop is still there, and too tight, you will feel it in the steering wheel. I had 1 or 2 threads left showing when it was all done.

I bet if you loosen it just a little your memory steer will go away.

unless it's your ball joints going out.
 
Last edited:
Oh man, I don't mean to sound like a dick on a broken record, but there is alot of invalid reasoning going on here... (hold your shock at there being bad engineering on the internet...)
duty_calls.png


I promise I mean nothing personal in any of what follows, I'm just commenting on the vilidity of some of the comments to point out logical fallacy.


Anyone below 75k without failures is bringing nothing to the table in terms of comments on quality. Racks should easily be tight for that long. If anyone had one fail in that time, then post it up and that maybe says something about quality (assuming it didn't fail because you screwed up the install or abused it somehow...). Holding up for 20k isn't "saying something". As far as the hitting a ditch goes, that doesn't necessarily say much about the rack, it says something about the suspension and suspension bushings, but unless the ditch tried to force the wheel to turn and the driver held super tight to the wheel, or the rack bottomed out, then I don't think the rack got that stressed by it (unless he physically hit the rack of course). Remember, the rack can only see force in the axial direction as long as the TRE's haven't bottomed out.

You won't get enough datapoints to gauge reputation changing over time unless someone like Safari just started crapping the bed in terms of quality. That hasn't happened with anyone (that I have heard at least...), so just go with what is out there for general opinions. People are just going to re-hash the old opinions anyway; it'll sound like you're getting new ones, but they really aren't.

are Safari's ITR's OEM quality? or has others needed to replace those?

I'd imagine they are OEM quality.

No, they aren't OEM quality. Since they have changed the bushing, they are no longer "OEM quality" even if they started from a brand new OEM rack. I work for an OES (original equipment supplier), so I am very familiar with the OEM approval process. The disassembly and bushing swap invalidates the original qualification, so the "seal of approval" is gone.

To be clear, as an automotive engineer, the way that I define "OEM quality" is "Has had the $h!t tested out of it". No aftermarket has the resources ($$$) to "test the $h!t out of it" the way the OEM does, so "OEM quality" is a BS marketing ploy. Ignore it.

That said, best to just get over this idea of OEM quality. If it isn't OEM, then it isn't OEM quality. The Safari may be stronger, but it hasn't been vetted out to nearly the extent that the OEM design has. That's not saying its worse, there's just more risk. Also, stronger may not be better.


Now I don't want to pick on Taylor, 'cause I like him, but I am going to dissect his post to point out a few things...

Yes they are. At least according to Safari they are.

According to the guy selling it to you... glad you gave that caveat

Ive been running the Safari rack for just over 5k miles now, and heres what I can tell you...

So at time=0... "It's good out of the box", that's all the rest of the words meant.

The difference between the Safari rack and every other brand (including oem) is in the internal bushings. The oem rack, along with every other rack out there most likely, includes nylon polymer bushings, while the Safari rack has brass bushings I believe. This is why they claim their rack is stronger, and should last longer. These would be the main bushings that slide horizontally within the rack as you turn it.

Yes, this came I think from someone who called Safari and talked about it. Accurate as to their claims.

Basically, brass bushings will resist corrosion from that friction better than nylon, and will maintain their tolerance longer.

Incorrect. Brass corrodes more than Nylon. Corrosion may or may not be an issue since much of the rack is protected by the ATF. The brass I believe is claimed to be better due to perhaps higher stiffness or higher UTS of brass, but those aren't necessarily the cause of failures in a bushing. "maintain their tolerance" is irrational. I think you mean that brass will deform less easily. That is maybe true; depends on the application.

I can tell you that the rack is fantastic so far. Its very tight, so much so that the wheels struggle to return to straight on their own when you let go of the steering wheel after going around a turn. I have to force the steering wheel to get the wheels pointing straight again. Over bumps the rack does not allow the wheels to pull at all. They just point exactly where you direct them. I had a crappy remanufactured oem rack (actually went through 2 of them, plus the original rack) before installing the Safari. So I cant compare this rack to a brand new Toyota rack. But I can tell you the rack made the single most noticeable improvement in handling of all the front end parts Ive changed, by far. It was a WORLD of difference from the two remanufactured racks I tried.

That sounds too tight... Also, other components affect the "tightness" of the steering, which is just an overall feeling, not a technical term. I had extremely "loose" steering when I first got my 4runner; turns out it was bad front shocks, had nothing to do with the rack.

So to make this long story short, most of the opinions here are not particularly valid. Just make your decision and place your order. There's no opinion better than how people actually spent their money (unless you're getting the opinion of and engineer that designs steering racks... then how does he spend HIS money!). If I had to do it again and had time to order off the internet, then yeah, I'd probably get a Safari. I didn't have time for that, so I got Napa as it was (I felt) the best one I could get my hands on that day and is returnable. You know what people have bought. The rest of the opinions are just minutia that will only serve to confuse you and make you over complicate the decision. You can do it, so do it; don't wait for more opinions.
hqdefault.jpg




One last point, stop leak is bad. I'll admit I used it on mine just to limp my way to the weekend. It's like putting gravy in your PS. I was leaking about a quart a day by thursday, so I was desperate. I also replaced both the rack and the pump and the pressure lines, so I effectively completely flushed the stop leak out.
 
Oh man, I don't mean to sound like a dick on a broken record, but there is alot of invalid reasoning going on here... (hold your shock at there being bad engineering on the internet...)
duty_calls.png


I promise I mean nothing personal in any of what follows, I'm just commenting on the vilidity of some of the comments to point out logical fallacy.


Anyone below 75k without failures is bringing nothing to the table in terms of comments on quality. Racks should easily be tight for that long. If anyone had one fail in that time, then post it up and that maybe says something about quality (assuming it didn't fail because you screwed up the install or abused it somehow...). Holding up for 20k isn't "saying something". As far as the hitting a ditch goes, that doesn't necessarily say much about the rack, it says something about the suspension and suspension bushings, but unless the ditch tried to force the wheel to turn and the driver held super tight to the wheel, or the rack bottomed out, then I don't think the rack got that stressed by it (unless he physically hit the rack of course). Remember, the rack can only see force in the axial direction as long as the TRE's haven't bottomed out.

You won't get enough datapoints to gauge reputation changing over time unless someone like Safari just started crapping the bed in terms of quality. That hasn't happened with anyone (that I have heard at least...), so just go with what is out there for general opinions. People are just going to re-hash the old opinions anyway; it'll sound like you're getting new ones, but they really aren't.

Stinking engineers. :moon: Ok, let me define my points a little better.

The rack holding up for 20k (even 75k) miles doesnt say much. Yes, I agree with that. It would take years, with hundreds of 3rd gens logging hundreds of thousands of miles on the Safari rack to provide accurate data points about the quality of the rack. So theres no way to objectively compare the Safari rack with oem right now. Keep in mind that I was comparing it to the 2 remanufactured oem racks I went through. Right out of the box they were both junk, whereas the Safari rack was not. My point was simple. The safari rack is superior to an oem remanufactured rack.


No, they aren't OEM quality. Since they have changed the bushing, they are no longer "OEM quality" even if they started from a brand new OEM rack. I work for an OES (original equipment supplier), so I am very familiar with the OEM approval process. The disassembly and bushing swap invalidates the original qualification, so the "seal of approval" is gone.

To be clear, as an automotive engineer, the way that I define "OEM quality" is "Has had the $h!t tested out of it". No aftermarket has the resources ($$$) to "test the $h!t out of it" the way the OEM does, so "OEM quality" is a BS marketing ploy. Ignore it.

Regarding the oem rack, Im not comparing longevity, durability, etc, again as I cant. I simply stated that the Safari rack uses brass bushings (which safari claims are stronger) while the oem rack uses nylon. By the way, I called Safari yesterday to confirm this for myself rather than just trusting what someone else said, and they confirmed it.

I dont know if they "disassemble" the rack to add brass bushings. Do you know that? There was a thread comparing the Safari and Atlantic Automotive Enterprises rack - whether or not they are the same. The Safari rack may be manufactured brand new at AAE with brass bushings. Also, I understand that by utilizing a different bushing, the rack is technically no longer "oem quality". But that's not to say its "lower" quality, ie. the bushing wont withstand as much or more stress, or last longer. Theres simply no way to prove this yet, other than in theory right?

An interesting point to add. Collin at Safari told me the main issue with the 3rd gen rack is not so much the rack itself, but the fact that it is located on the trailing end of the wheels, rather than leading. He said on all newer models the rack pivots the wheels from the front, which puts much less stress on the rack.

That said, best to just get over this idea of OEM quality. If it isn't OEM, then it isn't OEM quality. The Safari may be stronger, but it hasn't been vetted out to nearly the extent that the OEM design has. That's not saying its worse, there's just more risk. Also, stronger may not be better.

Ok, good point. I didnt read this until after writing the above paragraph.

Now I don't want to pick on Taylor, 'cause I like him, but I am going to dissect his post to point out a few things...

According to the guy selling it to you... glad you gave that caveat

So at time=0... "It's good out of the box", that's all the rest of the words meant.

Yes, this came I think from someone who called Safari and talked about it. Accurate as to their claims.

True, brass bushings. Regarding the ITRs which op asked about, Im assuming they are an OE part, probably beck arnley. I say that because I also ordered ubjs from Safari, and to my surprise they were not Toyota oem, but beck arnley. I admit I dont know the difference between beck arnley and Toyota oem regarding quality. I would rather use oem. I am speculating that since Safari (who specializes in building toyota off road rigs) sells beck arnley, it should be a strong oe product. Fairly subjective there I admit.

Incorrect. Brass corrodes more than Nylon. Corrosion may or may not be an issue since much of the rack is protected by the ATF. The brass I believe is claimed to be better due to perhaps higher stiffness or higher UTS of brass, but those aren't necessarily the cause of failures in a bushing. "maintain their tolerance" is irrational. I think you mean that brass will deform less easily. That is maybe true; depends on the application.

Ok, since engineers must be as accurately technical as possible. Perhaps my terminology was not correct, but nothing I said was irrational. I dont think nylon can technically corrode, as its not a metal, correct? Because brass is stronger, logically it should resist friction better than nylon (unless it actually corrodes). And, youre an engineer, you know what I mean by tolerance. When the bushing (be it nylon or brass or any given material) "deform"s in the rack, it does so as a result (primarily) of friction against the cylinder. The bushing looses material, no longer fits as designed tightly in the cylinder, and gradually goes out of tolerance. So you get a loose, sloppy, eventually even clunky steering rack. By tolerance I simply mean the tightness in which the bushing fits in the rack cylinder.

That sounds too tight... Also, other components affect the "tightness" of the steering, which is just an overall feeling, not a technical term. I had extremely "loose" steering when I first got my 4runner; turns out it was bad front shocks, had nothing to do with the rack.

Let me elaborate. When I say I have to force the steering wheel to return the wheels to straight, I dont mean I have to muscle it. In fact, even my loose, sloppy old reman racks were the same, I had to turn the wheel to return to straight. Maybe I have a bad pump? The difference is that the bumps, dips, gravel, etc. would pull the front end all over the place with the reman racks, while the Safari rack feels incredibly solid. The steering feels very much like my dads 09 Tundra, which in my opinion is excellent.

I dont think the rack guide is an issue. I adjusted it on two of my three previous racks, and over tightening it made the wheel difficult to turn. This is not the case with my Safari rack. My underlying point is simply that the Safari rack feels stiff and solid and a good way

So to make this long story short, most of the opinions here are not particularly valid. Just make your decision and place your order. There's no opinion better than how people actually spent their money (unless you're getting the opinion of and engineer that designs steering racks... then how does he spend HIS money!). If I had to do it again and had time to order off the internet, then yeah, I'd probably get a Safari. I didn't have time for that, so I got Napa as it was (I felt) the best one I could get my hands on that day and is returnable. You know what people have bought. The rest of the opinions are just minutia that will only serve to confuse you and make you over complicate the decision. You can do it, so do it; don't wait for more opinions.

Yeah. Buy the product that gives you peace of mind.
 
:lmao:
HAHA, I made you waste as much of your time as I wasted of mine! Now you know what it's like being an engineer, it's like ADD but with boring technical stuff...

Just to repeat, no criticism intended for misusing the terminology. Common usage of these terms is different from the actual definition, so if the conversation is drifting into a technical discussion,you have to go to church on your terminology and start using the right definition.

Without wasting too much more time, I'll just boil it down to a couple points:

I don't know that brass is a "better" bushing material just because it's stronger. Stronger isn't always better. I would bet that nylon has a much lower coefficient of friction than brass, so maybe nylon is actually better. I would have to do some research before being convinced brass is better. Ultimately though, I'm not going to worry about it because it isn't worth the effort to find the answer (for me at least)

That's an interesting point on the steering configuration.

On the stiffness, new ITRE's often are very tight, so that might be part of it. Agree that the guide probably isn't the issue. I would still question the effect of the rack on the looseness though. There are so many other things that affect looseness over bumps that I would struggle to believe that the factor turning it on and off is the rack. You may have had terrible luck with 2 reman's, but statistically speaking, 2 bad rack out of the box should be EXTREMELY unlikely.

If it is not centering itself, then yeah, I might start taking a look at your pump. It should return to center on it's own. When I had my guide overtightened, it didn't return to center, so if you adjusted that, then maybe you do need to back it off a little bit.



One point that hasn't been discussed here is to double check that whatever rack you buy has the new design of the rack guide on it. Napa had both versions, so I had to order the rack for an 01/02 and not the one for my 00. The 00 rack had the roller guide.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,102
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top