Tacoma Rated Worst Compact Pickup by Consumer Reports...

Car Nut

New member

Attachments

  • Tacoma.jpg
    Tacoma.jpg
    137 KB · Views: 1,020
Register to hide this ad
I'm not sure where the reliability claim came from, however it is time for an update.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the 3rd gens have had nothing but issues since they came out. Transmission issues, shifting issues, rear diff issues, etc. I'm not surprised they came in last right now. Toyota has a lot to address with the 3rd gens.
 
It's gotten so large it's hardly a compact truck anymore

It's all relative, a "compact sedan" these days is as big as a full-sized was in the 90's. All the "Compact Trucks" are about the size of most "half-tons" back in the 90's. The full-sized got even bigger.

~

Normally I'd say that Consumer Reports is just a shill rag with no real sensibilities on how to review a product properly, but even a broken clock is right twice.
 
I'm able to give some insight into this. I bought a 16' Tacoma in October 2015. Double cab, SR5, 2wd. The thing was plagued with driveline issues. Multiple transmission problems (4). Then the rear end developed a nice tendency to decide sometimes for the truck to not go anywhere at all.

The 3.5 belongs in a Camry, not a truck. I had nothing but issues with it. I really wanted to love the truck and am a lifelong Toyota fan.

My Dad drives a 16' Tundra 4x4, his significant other a RAV4, its a Yoda family. Trading it in for the 16' 4Runner 4x4 was the best move I ever made. It has been flawless. I took it on a 5k mile road trip a few days after buying it.

I believe every bad thing said about gen3 tacos. Unfortunately.
 
3rd gen Taco's are a shit show right now. Sooooo glad I went 4Runner!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I bought my 2016 4Runner because I was afraid the 17 would get the crap 3.5 if they re-styled them. The whole concept of the 3.5 in a Truck is wrong IMO.......do you really want to rev the Bejesus out of a truck to get the power?!:deadhorse: I stuck with the 4.0.http://www.toyota-4runner.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=257185&stc=1&d=1498337741

To be fair, the basic concept of the 2GR-FKS is not a bad one, but it suffers from CAFE Standards being a main design goal. It's Atkinson's Cycle style design unfortunately leaves it a bit more anemic than it should be and that combined with a fuel-efficient powertrain programming leaves the engine wanting. It's a shame really.
 
To be fair, the basic concept of the 2GR-FKS is not a bad one, but it suffers from CAFE Standards being a main design goal. It's Atkinson's Cycle style design unfortunately leaves it a bit more anemic than it should be and that combined with a fuel-efficient powertrain programming leaves the engine wanting. It's a shame really.

See that's the thing, it is not an Atkinson's cycle motor. It has computer programming that mimics the Atkinson cycle during certain conditions. It's a joke. I agree, what a shame.
 
Have a neighbor that went through three of them and he lawyered up to have the dealer buy them back every time. He decided to jump ship and bought a diesel Colorado. He hasn't looked back since.
 
My buddy got a Taco TRD Pro back in November and so far so good. He only has about 8k miles on it though. I've actually been quite impressed by it's off road performance. Bone stock it's kept up with my 4R on every obstacle except for when approach/departure angle were a factor. I would even say it did better in the mud with the stock tires than my 4R did with KO2's, although that probably has more to do with overall weight and weight distribution.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,316
Messages
3,554,105
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top