The End to my 4runner

[MENTION=137714]Tunerpike[/MENTION] they have to program or detune in your words the engines to get the best MPG out of the engine. So they can state that for the EPA. If it wasn't that way, they'll have to justify the 16 vs 20mpg hwy and people wouldn't buy base on gas mileage.

On reliability based on JD Powers report, 50% of all buyers in 2015 look for reliability in their purchases. I'm also seeing if Nissan puts out the Cummins 2.8L turbo diesel. We shall see.

2015 Initial Quality Study: 10 Most Important Factors in Vehicle Purchase | J.D. Power Cars
 
reliability isn't a problem with the new Jeeps. Hackers will steal them or remotely crash them before they have time to break down. :juggle:

1

2

3

4

5
 
Or you might? :wink2:

This is my Jeep JKU Rubicon on the beach in Florida, at a dealership in Michigan and in Chicago in the winter. It was a great road vehicle, comfortable for 10+ hours at a time.

No one cares about that orange thing.

What the **** is that Mad Max looking modern Scrambler thing and where can I get one?
 
reliability isn't a problem with the new Jeeps. Hackers will steal them or remotely crash them before they have time to break down. :juggle:

So now we all know about this. EVERYONE knows about this vulnerability. Any idiot with a laptop can steal a Fiat product. I can see how they might think a software based system might be a good idea but in this case it didn't work.

The question is, will this vulnerability carry over to the 2017 models and will they voluntarily recall the substandard vehicles to to fix the problem?

My guess is no.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,083
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top