What exhaust system increases gas mileage and sounds badass?

i know it would really come down to preference.. i was in the same scenario when i was trying to decide on what exhaust to put since i didn't really want anything obnoxiously loud nor wanting much drone in the cabin..

so i started with flowmaster 50 SUV.. it sounded good but drone was there at a certain RPM.. so sold it and moved on to the next one which was the borla turbo muffler.. once again love the sound but it was louder than my flowmaster im thinking due to having a smaller casing.. so ditched that and tried a bigger magnaflow muffler and it was perfect.. sounds great when you gun it and tame on the highway and during regular driving.

oh and this was an add on muffler only stock piping and no resonator i had it cut and re routed the tip to the side.
 
The best mod I have ever done to my 2003 V8 is the Magnaflow Cat-Back system. It growls, without being annoying, and seems to boost HP. As for the claims of additional mpg, I can not report any after one year. It is still worth it for the sound and performance, but the extra mpg claims are not true.
 
we just re-did mine.... flow 40...gutted all 4 cats....cut off resonator...and re routed out the side...still gotta get a tip...but it sounds good...its not too loud...mines a v6 as well...
 
I'm curious about this. Can someone confirm of deny?

The perfect exhaust system would have zero back pressure and 100% exhaust velocity but it is not easily feasible. First what exactly is exhaust theory? Your exhaust system is designed to evacuate gases from the combustion chamber quickly and efficiently. Exhaust gases are not produced in a smooth stream; exhaust gases originate in pulses. A 4 cylinder motor will have 4 distinct pulses per complete engine cycle, a 6 cylinder has 6 pules and so on. The more pulses that are produced, the more continuous the exhaust flow. Back pressure can be loosely defined as the resistance to positive flow - in this case, the resistance to positive flow of the exhaust stream.

The other reason why people say "backpressure is good" is because they hear that cars (or motorcycles) that have had performance exhaust work done to them would then go on to burn exhaust valves. Now, it is true that such valve burning has occurred as a result of the exhaust mods, but it isn't due merely to a lack of backpressure.

The valve burning occurs as a result of a very lean-burning engine, not lack of back pressure and this is only true in older vehicles with carburetion often could not adjust because of the way that backpressure caused air to flow backwards through the carburetor after the air already got loaded down with fuel, and caused the air to receive a second load of fuel.

Modern EFI engines that have a computer that controls the engine will detect that the engine is burning leaner than before, and will adjust fuel injection to compensate. So, in effect, reducing backpressure really does two good things: The engine can use work otherwise spent pushing exhaust gas out the tailpipe to propel the car forward, and the engine breathes better.

Now a little talk about the role exhaust velocity plays in relations to exhaust back pressure. Many people mistakenly believe that wider pipes are more effective at clearing the combustion chamber than narrower pipes. It's not hard to see how this idea would be appealing - as wider pipes have the capability to flow more than narrower pipes. However, this omits the concept of exhaust VELOCITY. Here is an analogy...a garden hose without a spray nozzle on it. If you let the water just run unrestricted out of the hose it flows at a rather slow rate. However, if you take your finger and cover part of the opening, the water will spray out at a much much faster rate.

Then there is the idea that bigger exhaust pipes will increase power. I believe it is/was a misunderstanding of what is going on with the exhaust stream as pipe diameters change. For instance, someone with a Honda Civic decides he's going to upgrade his exhaust with a 3" diameter piping. Once it's installed the owner notices that he seems to have lost a good bit of power throughout the power band. He makes the connections in the following manner: "My wider exhaust eliminated all back pressure but I lost power, therefore the motor must need some back pressure in order to make power." What he did not realize is that he killed off all his flow velocity by using such a ridiculously wide pipe. It would have been possible for him to achieve close to zero back pressure with a much narrower pipe - in that way he would not have lost all his flow velocity.

The faster an exhaust pulse moves, the better it can scavenge out all of the spent gasses during valve overlap. The guiding principles of exhaust pulse scavenging are a bit beyond the scope of this article but the general idea is a fast moving pulse creates a low pressure area behind it. This low pressure area acts as a vacuum and draws along the air behind it. Conclusion. Each engine will before function its best best with a exhaust system balanced to its needs and characteristics with a goal of to producing the the highest exhaust gas speeds.


in a nut shell, exhaust back pressure is bad and exhaust velocity is good. this is the exact science that flowmaster claims they build their mufflers with. Now personally i do not like flowmaster mufflers and have seen some reports of certain engines actually creating less peak HP/TQ than stock with a flowmaster muffler.

-----------------------------------------

anywho my personal recommendations for muffler type in no particular order is

-- Borla

-- Bassani

-- Corsa

-- Magnaflow
 
Last edited:
here is a few videos and pictures of my Magnaflow exhaust i pieced together though, its very simply muffler swap and resonator delete. the muffler, tip and install were right around $120.







582131_3590759525344_271043925_n.jpg


550537_3638182950900_1735942420_n.jpg
 
What size muffler is that?

It is a 4.5" round body with a 15" case, overall length is around 24" and the inlet/outlet diameter is 2.5" I can't remember the part number but it was $40 on Amazon.com iirc it was 10416 or 26 can't recall.

Either way it's just the cheapest bullet style Magnaflow muffler I could find.
 
I would recommend the Gibson exhaust any day. It sounds amazing, constantly receiving compliments about how good my truck sounds. It is cheap for a full cat back exhaust, and I got the stainless steel version, which is $100 more than the aluminum; worth it if rust is a risk you deal with. I did see a slight increase of about .5-1.0 MPG, and definitely some more power on the highway; not a lot, but enough to feel it.
 
Just to throw another name in there dirty deeds industries over on Toyota 120 vendors section seems to be an interesting option as well.
 
I got it now, but redbow the muffler I linked was yours correct? I want to get the same muffler as you!

Jack

Yea 10416 or something like that, really any straight through turbo type muffler or "bullet" is going to sound about the same. I only picked that Magnaflow because It was the cheapest stainless muffler I could find.

I spent more on one XR1 Borla muffler for my last vehicle than I did my muffler, tip and install this time.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,317
Messages
3,554,125
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top