Quote:
Originally Posted by dorton
Your observation of the critics all being right wing goes along with a casual observation of most polarbearsbeswimingologists tend to be far left. I'm sure they wouldn't have an agenda. I mean it's not like they get huge grants or major funding for proliferating theories based on inadequate sample periods.
|
Have you researched the claim of pro-climate change scientists being far left? I'm assuming this claim, as your lieing for grants theory, has no actual evidence to support it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bofa
Can you blame someone for using data from the same period to refute your position? If anything that would give me more cause to be skeptical of your assumptions. If data from even the limited window in which you propose significant changes cannot even be consistent, how can you really believe in such data?
|
I'm not even sure what you are referring to. I've never proposed a 'limited window' for significant change. Where have I posted information that has as short a sample period as most of the charts 1engineer posted. Some of them only go back as far as 96.
That aside, the reason you often see information only going back as far as 1978 is that is as far back as we have satellite data. See my previous post for how satellite data was interpolated leading to some incorrect conclusions.
Also this graph and the one below it are showing the same thing. A warming trend.
