Quote:
Originally Posted by -JD-
1engineer, here is an interesting read on how satellite data, and in particular much of the data you cited (UAH, HADcrut4) has been interpolated and what most scientist think are the problems with how they extrapolated that data.
Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends - Cowtan - 2014 - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society - Wiley Online Library
We are never going to get anywhere with this debate when we can't agree on the basic facts.
I find it funny that some of you guys think that things like sun spots, El Nino or the Milankovitch Cycles are things that real climate scientists haven't considered yet. I also find it extremely suspicious that most of the leading 'skeptic' scientists always seem to have strong ties to right wing american politics. From what I've read your often cited Dr Roy Spencer is also a creationist?
^Well I certainly notice it in the information coming from the skeptics. |
You sure are quick to dismiss the notion of the sun having anything to do with earth temperature cycles. Seems kinda closed minded since.....that's what controls our planet's temperature.
Your observation of the critics all being right wing goes along with a casual observation of most polarbearsbeswimingologists tend to be far left. I'm sure they wouldn't have an agenda. I mean it's not like they get huge grants or major funding for proliferating theories based on inadequate sample periods.
Threaded Mode
