FJ Cruiser, not Land Cruiser, is now top dog in off-roading!

It seems to me we see this as N. Americans. The FJ is probably the most capable off-road here. My guess is the extra torque and low-end power of a diesel would add a little to the desirability of the LC200 for off-road use. I would also think a 3dr Prado diesel could out do an FJC. Nothing like a bunch of sweet, smooth torque to pull you through soft stuff or to crawl over rough stuff.
 
Hang on...yes the statement is horses mouth, but it is most likely the Marketing department of the horse.

The LC is still a legend, but marketing wise maybe there is no reason to position it as the best stock off-roader.

The debate will have to rage on. :)


J

Maybe, but you can't argue with the facts that the FJ has better approach, departure, and breakover angles IN ADDITION to a rear locker.

Now, since i have written this thread, the 2010 4runner TE has come out...and THAT 4runner is probably the best off-roader in Toyota lineup! Now, if you talk about longevity and durability in the harshest climate as an indicator of off-road capability, then yeah, the LC takes the prize. However, if you talk about pure off-road capability in the roughest terrain (without care about durability), then the 4runner (or FJ) is the best.

It seems to me we see this as N. Americans. The FJ is probably the most capable off-road here. My guess is the extra torque and low-end power of a diesel would add a little to the desirability of the LC200 for off-road use. I would also think a 3dr Prado diesel could out do an FJC. Nothing like a bunch of sweet, smooth torque to pull you through soft stuff or to crawl over rough stuff.

Diesel is nice, but you can't substitute for a rear locker or better angles. It is not like the FJ (or 2010 4runner TE) are handicapped by 3-cylinder engines! :D With low range, much of the power deficit can be forgiven under most circumstances.
 
Diesel is nice, but you can't substitute for a rear locker or better angles. It is not like the FJ (or 2010 4runner TE) are handicapped by 3-cylinder engines! :D With low range, much of the power deficit can be forgiven under most circumstances.

True but there's nothing cooler than the slight rattle of a diesel as your hooking the recovery strap to pull your buddies poser G-wagon out:lmao:




j/k!
 
True but there's nothing cooler than the slight rattle of a diesel as your hooking the recovery strap to pull your buddies poser G-wagon out:lmao:

j/k!

That is just wrong to say...i ought to ban your arse!! Oh wait, i can't.... :bigok:
 
Maybe, but you can't argue with the facts that the FJ has better approach, departure, and breakover angles IN ADDITION to a rear locker.

Diesel is nice, but you can't substitute for a rear locker or better angles. It is not like the FJ (or 2010 4runner TE) are handicapped by 3-cylinder engines! :D With low range, much of the power deficit can be forgiven under most circumstances.

I agree, size matters...and the FJ wins for the reasons mentioned. Does the 2010 4Runner TE actually have angles that can compete with the FJ?

J
 
I agree, size matters...and the FJ wins for the reasons mentioned. Does the 2010 4Runner TE actually have angles that can compete with the FJ?

J

Not sure...but i think that the approach angle is slightly better on the 2010 TE, but the departure angle is slightly worst. But more than anything, the TE gives you a better view outside, whereas the FJ is kinda limited...and this is a major plus while off-roading IMHO.
 
Not sure...but i think that the approach angle is slightly better on the 2010 TE, but the departure angle is slightly worst.
FJ approach/departure/ground clearance = 34°/31°/9.6"
T4R approach/departure/ground clearance = 24°/24°/9.0"

FJ wins all round in this department.
 
But more than anything, the TE gives you a better view outside, whereas the FJ is kinda limited...and this is a major plus while off-roading IMHO.

I agree about the value of visibility and that might argue for an '09 Trail.
 
FJ approach/departure/ground clearance = 34°/31°/9.6"
T4R approach/departure/ground clearance = 24°/24°/9.0"

FJ wins all round in this department.

Those are NOT the numbers for the TE. According to Toyota:

approach = 33
departure = 26
ground clearance = 9.6

So, i guess that i was wrong anyways with the approach angle.
 
Those are NOT the numbers for the TE. According to Toyota:
Looks like I listed the 2wd specs. I hate that website, I had selected the TE previously but it seems to default back to the 2wd for some stupid reason...
 
Looks like I listed the 2wd specs. I hate that website, I had selected the TE previously but it seems to default back to the 2wd for some stupid reason...

As an astute member of this forum, you should have recognized the gross error right away!! :D

But, yeah, i hate Toyota website...takes forever to load up.
 
As an astute member of this forum, you should have recognized the gross error right away!! :D

But, yeah, i hate Toyota website...takes forever to load up.

"Astute" member? sweet, I'm just a "registered" member. :)

Anyway, break over is a big one as well. Getting hung up is a real challenge. I've been well ridiculed (and rightly so) when the Jeeps have dragged my butt out of one obstacle only to have me stuck on my belly 5 meters later. Another strong point for FJ. In the terrain around here, the size of the LC would be a major factor.

J
 
Why will toyota discontinue the FJ?
I'm not surprise about the matrix.
The 10 Best Discontinued Cars - Rick Newman (usnews.com)

I have no idea what Toyota was thinking when they redesigned the Matrix...they made it even uglier!! The Pontiac Vibe was always the better looking twin IMO.

With the 2010 TE coming out, a lot of people here think that the FJ days are numbered.

I think that, from the list linked above, the two best buys are the Pontiac G8 and Honda S2000.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,317
Messages
3,554,129
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top