2.7L 4cyl ?

BitShifter

New member
Of the 4cyl toyotas how do these rank in terms of longevity ? Ive got a 91 4runner now, but im looking at a 1995 tacoma pickup 4x4 that has this motor in it.

Im only familiar with the 22R engines.

Time to do some research.

Comments ?
 
Register to hide this ad
Get a 3.4L V6 if you want longevity.
The 4 cylinders have a tendency for the exhaust valves sinking and tightening up; not all that much though, I guess it all depends on how hard you run it.
If you do buy a 4 cylinder, make sure you have the valve clearances checked first.
 
The 2.7 is an incredibly reliable, problem free, long lasting motor. General concensus on these forums is that the 2.7 will out last the 3.4. Early 2.7's like the 95.5 you are looking at sometimes developed a crack in the exhaust manifold, if left unfixed it could cause undue heat near the cylinders and lead to trouble. This issue is not as prevalent as people make it seem, I owned 3 2.7's and never had an issue, and one was the 95.5. A friend has 181k w/ no problems at all. Later models received a new design and the problem went away. Maintenance on the 2.7 is far easier than on the 3.4, not to mention it has a timing chain, but unlike the 22re achilles heel, Toyota used metal chain guides so they don't wear out and dig into the engine. The 2.7 3rz has developed a reputation at least equal to if not surpassing the venerable 22re it replaced. And don't take this as anti 3.4, I have one now and like it, but had I not crashed my 00 Runner I would still be driving the 2.7 and loving it. So buy the 2.7, it will live up to the expectations the 22re has helped you create, and maybe even impress you a little.
 
Last edited:
120K and still running strong.

Not the most powerful motor that's for sure, but I'm getting on average of 20-21 mpg.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,306
Messages
3,554,045
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top