With the seats folded down, the load floor is completely flat, but there's no under-floor storage, as the seat bottoms slide rearward when the seatbacks flip forward. It's also worth noting that overall cargo capacity is down considerably. In the GX 470, the third-row seats could be taken out, leaving up to 49.7 cubic feet of space. Fold the GX 460's third-row seats and it only opens up 17 cubic feet of space. Space behind the third row is down from 13.2 cubic feet to 4.2 cubic feet.
Only 17 cubic feet behind the 2nd row with 3rd row folded compared to 49.7 in the 1st gen with seats removed? And only 4.2 behind the 3rd row? I'm sorry but that is way too much space to give up for the fold-flat convenience, especially since most folks I know with the 3rd row T4R/GX are like me and use it sparingly.
Yes I agree it would be fair to compare the 2nd gen's number to the 1st gen with 3rd row folded up as well as fully removed. However, the new 2nd gen's cargo space behind the 2nd row is unacceptably paltry IMO for a 5,000+ lb SUV, only 17 cu ft! I'm starting to see why they finally added an opening rear hatch - you're gonna have to have all your luggage sticking out the backApparently, this is true...see link above regarding GX460's product info.I guess that is the price you have to pay for having both a fold-flat 3rd row AND a solid rear axle...this is why not many solid-axled SUV have fold flat 3rd rows....
However, Greg, the fair thing is to compare cargo space behind the 2nd row WITH your 3rd row in the GX470 (but folded up) versus GX460 with the fold-flat 3rd row.
Alright now I'm really confused.
Does the GX 470 hatch open upwards vs sideways?
Does the GX 470 hatch open upwards vs sideways?