Am trying to make the final decision between the a 4Runner and Acadia, I really like Toyota in general and I think they make great cars, am currently driving a CAMRY and am very satisfied with it. This is what I have so far, Acadia seems to have so much more cargo space, but lack off road capabilities, the seats on the 4Runner seem more comfortable then the seats at the Acadia, captain seats on the Acadia together with enough leg room on the third row seat makes it a real 7 passenger car, the 4Runner drive so much more smoothly specially steering handling but a little bet bouncy which I don’t mind, the Acadia on the other hand seems t0 have more power and better acceleration when hitting the gas paddle, the 4Runner seems to drag a bet, now for price and availability, I Can not find a 2010 4Runner SR5 Black on Black with third row seats, if am going to order it I will need to wait for almost 3 months and the best price I found was $32,500 which is almost $1,800 then the price of the Toyota build your car website, on the other hand I can get a 2010 Acadia LSE Black on Black Bluetooth and back end camera with Capitan seat and third row seats for $31,000 which is almost $5000 over MSRP, any feedback is greatly appreciated.
4runner 2010 VS. Acadia 2010
- Thread starter alrodan
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
JAC
New member
If the most important thing is the cargo and passenger capacity go with the Acadia. Also if you are not planning on keeping it for more than 3-4 years
If reliability, performance and durability is what you want..and also thinking on keeping it for life...Go with the 4runner....even if you want to trade it in later.... the resale value is way better in the long run and you will get buyers on the spot.....JMHO
PS: if you decide to get the 4runner get a 4wd.
If reliability, performance and durability is what you want..and also thinking on keeping it for life...Go with the 4runner....even if you want to trade it in later.... the resale value is way better in the long run and you will get buyers on the spot.....JMHO
PS: if you decide to get the 4runner get a 4wd.
Last edited:
snhrph
New member
If you want a crossover - get the Acadia; if you want body-on-frame - get the 4Runner.
Two completely different vehicles with different customer bases. Figure out what factors are the most important to you, and that should be your "litmus paper".
Asking a bunch of 4Runner enthusiasts if they would choose GM SUV over T4R is silly - did you really expect anyone here to say that Acadia is BETTER than 4Runner? :nono:
FWIW, I own 2 Toyota 120 platform trucks. :driving:, one of them was $20K more than Acadia. Money ain't everything...
Two completely different vehicles with different customer bases. Figure out what factors are the most important to you, and that should be your "litmus paper".
Asking a bunch of 4Runner enthusiasts if they would choose GM SUV over T4R is silly - did you really expect anyone here to say that Acadia is BETTER than 4Runner? :nono:
FWIW, I own 2 Toyota 120 platform trucks. :driving:, one of them was $20K more than Acadia. Money ain't everything...
If you routinely need to carry 6 or 7 people, I think you're better served by a minivan. The 2011 Sienna looks nice, if you're looking at a Toyota.
If you need the 3rd row only for rare occasions, then it seems like you should get the vehicle that satisfies you the most (versus the one with the most room).
As others have pointed out, the Acadia is longer (201.1 in) and wider (78.9 in) than the 4Runner (189.9 in long, 75.8 in wide).
I've learned to not be lured by steep discounts alone. Also keep in mind that you're not going to be seeing steep GM-like discounts on the 4Runner anytime soon, assuming that Toyota continues to keep the supply in check.
The 4Runner was my first choice and I will stick with it, it's more expensive but I need reliability, I usually change cars every 8 years, and we are expecting our first kid this January so I will only need the third row seat when taking road tips with family and basically the kids in the third row seat, thank all. Now I need to start looking for a SR5 black on black or magnetic gray on black, for less then $32,500, I live in Dallas but will actually fly where ever to get one.
FWIW, the first '10 SR5 4x4 4Runner I saw in person, was about a month ago in Magnetic Gray W/black interior, and 3rd row seating.
It was at this Dealer:Salt Lake City Area New Toyota and Used Cars | Larry H. Miller Toyota
I'm in Vegas and just bought a Trail Edition. The dealer here has 12 4runners on the lot. Here's the site...Inventory Henderson NV, 89011 Findlay Toyota Zip code is 89011. Good luck!
Also 10 at Desert Toyota in Vegas. Toyota All Las Vegas, Nevada - Desert Toyota
They also have a black TE on the lot.
They also have a black TE on the lot.
4Funnr
New member
I have never owned a truck but drive several Chevys at work. I thought my new 5th Gen T4R would ride rough like other trucks. Man was I wrong. It is smooth as anything and is a very plush tight ride. Bumps feel like nothing.
If it is just you, your wife, and one or two kids, you don't need something the size of an Acadia. And if you are not going to go offroad or tow, then I would get something other than a 4Runner. I like my 4Runner, but you pay a price for the solid rear axle and heavy frame. If you don't need that capability, you'll likely be happier with a crossover or wagon.
This isn't going to help since I doubt you were planning on flying this far, but I saw a grey SR5 2WD with the third row (and optional audio with Bluetooth, rear-view camera, alarm, 115V outlet) in Honolulu. MSRP including destination charge was $32,310.
I agree -- you will pay a premium for the 4Runner, but I think it's worth it if you like the way it looks and feels. That being said, I'm enjoying my Venza. I didn't need a 3rd row or trailer towing capability.
Different strokes for different folks. After all, it is his money, and he can do what he wants with it. I've put 85k miles on my 4Runner. I have it because I take it offroad.
It rides pretty good, for a truck. It handles pretty good, for a truck. It brakes pretty good, for a truck. But it is definitely a truck and you won't ever mistake it for a car. Every time I rent a car or drive Mrs. M1911's C240, I am reminded just how badly my 4Runner handles in comparison. And don't even talk to me about fuel economy.
There are lots of folks who buy SUVs when they might be better off with a different type of vehicle (e.g., station wagon, minivan, cross-over).
Last edited:
All the more reason to take one's time to make a decision and not rely too much on those of us on a 4Runner forum to help make that decision. After all, none of us are stuck with alrodan's payments either way he goes (Acadia or 4Runner).
If I had to make a decision today (2010 Venza vs. 2010 4Runner), it'd be much more difficult. When I was shopping in 2008/2009 (when I had a buyer lined up for my 2005 SE), I had already ruled out another 4th Gen 4Runner. Why? To me, the whole reason to buy a new car is to get something different from what I was previously driving.
Shawk00
New member
I AM a 4Runner guy... but here are my picks in order IF YOU NEED the 3rd row...
1) Acadia/Outlook/Traverse
2) Honda Pilot
3)GMC Yukon (though you're getting big here... the 07+ are nice & MUCH improved)
I don't like the 3rd row in the Highlander at all so I can't recommend it or the 4Runner. The 3rd row in the Highlander is a cheesy one piece (no split) and the 4th Gen 4Runner 3rd row was barely useful IMO. I haven't seen if they've changed it in the new 5th gen 4Runner. If you don't need the 3rd row then the 4Runner goes to the top of the list for me. My wife has a 09' Outlook (Traverse/Acadia) with 25k and we have no regrets. Her previous vehicles... new generation 07' Yukon SLT, 08' Sante Fe Ltd 3rd row (just slightly small for a family trips but an excellent vehicle), 04' Honda Pilot, 03' Honda Pilot. We chose the Outlook over a new gen Pilot. My previous dd prior to my 4Runner was a Lexus Rx330 (swapped it for a 4Runner when we bought out boat). The materials in the Outlook aren't to the quality level but neither is the price. For the money these vehicles are a really good value. The Outlook is ever bit as comfy as my RX and probably even more so. The space in our Outlook is incredible... GM really nailed everything with these. They are one of the safest SUV's on the road, excellent in all weather conditions (AWD), incredibly popular and I really look for these to continue in gaining market over the next few years.
Btw... I agree with those recommending the Sienna... We would have test drove one as well if I could have convinced my wife to at least consider a mini van. But for now, she has no interest. I tease her all the time that she's driving a mini van in disguise but she doesn't care because it doesn't look like a mini van. :biggrin2:
1) Acadia/Outlook/Traverse
2) Honda Pilot
3)GMC Yukon (though you're getting big here... the 07+ are nice & MUCH improved)
I don't like the 3rd row in the Highlander at all so I can't recommend it or the 4Runner. The 3rd row in the Highlander is a cheesy one piece (no split) and the 4th Gen 4Runner 3rd row was barely useful IMO. I haven't seen if they've changed it in the new 5th gen 4Runner. If you don't need the 3rd row then the 4Runner goes to the top of the list for me. My wife has a 09' Outlook (Traverse/Acadia) with 25k and we have no regrets. Her previous vehicles... new generation 07' Yukon SLT, 08' Sante Fe Ltd 3rd row (just slightly small for a family trips but an excellent vehicle), 04' Honda Pilot, 03' Honda Pilot. We chose the Outlook over a new gen Pilot. My previous dd prior to my 4Runner was a Lexus Rx330 (swapped it for a 4Runner when we bought out boat). The materials in the Outlook aren't to the quality level but neither is the price. For the money these vehicles are a really good value. The Outlook is ever bit as comfy as my RX and probably even more so. The space in our Outlook is incredible... GM really nailed everything with these. They are one of the safest SUV's on the road, excellent in all weather conditions (AWD), incredibly popular and I really look for these to continue in gaining market over the next few years.
Btw... I agree with those recommending the Sienna...
We would have test drove one as well if I could have convinced my wife to at least consider a mini van. But for now, she has no interest. I tease her all the time that she's driving a mini van in disguise but she doesn't care because it doesn't look like a mini van. :biggrin2:
Last edited:
