"Anti-Bilsteinism"...A Perspective

Thai

Elite Member
Hey all,

As you know, on my '02 4runner, i changed my factory shocks to Bilsteins about 7 months ago. Bilsteins have always been one of the most highly recommended upgrade to the 4Runner (3rd gen). Thus, i thought it would help.

Since getting Bilsteins, i have noticed a few things:
- Ride is firmer...SIGNIFICANTLY firmer.
- Less body roll...slightly less.
- Less brake dive...excellent.
- Less wind wander...excellent.
- More control over bumps...yes, but ride is sacrificed. More jerkiness.

Well, today, i switched back to the factory (OEM--Tokico twin-tube low-pressure) shocks. Let me tell you, the ride is soooo much better! Sooo much smoother. You do not feel every zit in the pavement...let's not mention broken pavement. Yeah, over big undulations, there is slight "floatiness" with factory shocks; however, with Bilsteins, the motion is more abrupt over the same undulation (jerking) and not as smoooooth. There is slightly more body sway around corners than Bilsteins. And these observations are with heavier than stock tires (same size, but BFG AT).

Now, for my off-roading needs, i think the factory shocks (with factory springs) are more than adequate. Why? Because with off-roading, i usually go slow (in LOW range). Therefore, there is little chance of factory shocks fading due to excessive heating. Also, the ride is softer, which is preferred in off-roading. Bottoming out is probably more likely with factory shocks; however, '99-up 4Runners rarely bottoms out...and the fact that most off-roading is under 15 mph, this makes bottoming out even less likely. I don't plan on joining Dakar races anytime soon.

Overall, i am really happy with switching back to factory shocks. I still have Bilsteins as my back up down the road. This just proves that Toyota engineers know best! :p

After this experience, I do NOT think that Toyota chose these OEM shocks because of cost-saving. My brother's old Jeep Wrangler had monotube high-pressure shocks, and that thing costs less than $25K. Indeed, in general, monotube shocks cost more than the equivalent twin-tube shocks. However, the design of the shock makes a BIG difference. In addition, Toyota can adjust the valving of it's shocks to match perfectly with the other parts of the suspension...in my opinion, NO aftermarket company can do this type of valving (despite their claims).

In fact, Toyota has DIFFERENT shocks for the 3rd gen 4Runner, depending on TIRE SIZE! Bilsteins does not. Bilstein only differentiates 2wd from 4wd models.

So, in conclusion, IF you have stock springs & shocks, then do NOT upgrade to aftermarket stuff. That combo is the perfect compromise in my opinion. If you have aftermarket springs, then my recommendation goes out the window.

My Opinion.
 
Register to hide this ad
To add to above:

After going from Factory shocks -> Bilsteins -> Factory shocks, i feel that shock selection at the factory produces virtually a custom shock absorber tailored for the vehicle's characteristics (as i have found out after $$ for Bilsteins). Among other things, here are a few of those characteristics that drive the factory choice: high speed behavior, low speed behavior, emergency fully laden behavior, emergency fully laden max braking behavior, center of gravity, suspension travel, suspension geometry, max vehicle weight, min vehicle weight, shock stroke length, vehicle roll center, etc.

As stated above, Toyota has DIFFERENT shocks for the 3rd gen 4Runner, depending on TIRE SIZE! Bilsteins does not have this type of "customization".

Also, Tokico (maker of Toyota shocks) makes excellent shocks and they are very durable.

If you're not lifting or changing out springs, STICK WITH FACTORY SHOCKS (and save $$$$ in the process). Take it from my experience! :dammit:
 
Nope...i kept my stock shocks when i installed the Bilsteins. It was just dusty when i took it back out of the closet.

As for Bilsteins, i bought them from an independent dealer.
 
Thai and others - damping question...

OEM shocks currently and I certainly do NOT want a firmer ride (this is my wife's daily driver). I tend to think that the problem with OEM shocks is not necessarily high or low-pressure oriented, but how the motion of the shock is controlled. Hard for me to explain, but they seem to absorb bumps really well and fail miserably on the rebound, as if there's no rebound damping at all, which basically feels like the UP motion after compressing the shock occurs FASTER than the down motion. Most times I'm driving it actually feels like after compressing into a dip or bump - be it at 5mph or 65mph - at the top of the upstroke/recovery I actually get thrown up against the lapbelt because it happens so fast. I've never had a truck I've owned feel like like - the motion control - I think it's called rebound damping - feels nonexistent.

Wondering if you or others have noticed this and what your thoughts may be on a comfy OEM-like replacement with better control?
 
I'll add this observation also...

IT often feels like the truck "hobby-horses" over expansion joints int he road - and it's got a fairly long wheelbase. I think the rebound-damping issue might be affecting this as well - by allowing the spring to return the shock to full-extend in such a fast, uncontrolled manner that the truck rides unecessarily like a bouncy toy(ota).

Thoughts?
 
Well, you're right. You can try to see if the Monroe SensaTRAC is any better.

Bilsteins provided good rebound control. However, it did not absorb the bump nearly as well.

It's hard to find the perfect shock for the 4runner. However, between Bilsteins and OEM, i would take OEM anyday.

Good Luck.
 
Well, I'll give the Bilsteins this...

they worked as a FANTASTIC alternative to OEM on my old '95 Explorer. WORLD of difference in terms of emergency handling and ride quality (they firmed everything up nicely without being harsh - that said, I think it's because that weak-ass chassis had so much flex to it they the body itself acted as a bit of a shock absorber).

Appreciate the heads-up on the Monroes, Thai. Has anyone else out there tried something different or noticed the same observations with the OEM setup?

I'm at 50k miles and sincerely believe that suspension gets refreshed between 60k and 75k miles in *every* one of my cars...

Thanks all.
 
Just FYI, Tokico Trekmaster shocks are actually harsher than Bilsteins. KYB is about the same as Bilsteins.

Monroe seems to be the closest to OEM, but slightly firmer.

The above are opinions from 4runner owners that i have read on other forums.
 
Interesting post.

Another thing to conside is the tires you are running. Every type of tire will act a little different on your suspension.
 
Still have 4Runner?

Thai,

I thought you sold your 4Runner to an acquaintance when you got your Mercedes G-class.

Edit:

I noticed now that Thai's post was old, from before he got the Mercedes.
 
Last edited:
I put Old man EMU's on my 95 Landcruiser, they were great, made in OZ for the LC. I don't know if they make them for 4runners??
 
Pitbull said:
I put Old man EMU's on my 95 Landcruiser, they were great, made in OZ for the LC. I don't know if they make them for 4runners??

OME shocks are twin-tube i think. I have heard good things about them in terms of off-roading. I am not sure if it will be as good on-road in terms of handling as the Bilsteins. OME provide a soft ride, probably similar to OEM shocks but with a bit more stiffness.

For 3rd gen 4runners, i don't think that OME has made anything specific for the 4runner. But, don't take my words, i may be outdated with the info.
 
Thai said:
OME shocks are twin-tube i think. I have heard good things about them in terms of off-roading. I am not sure if it will be as good on-road in terms of handling as the Bilsteins. OME provide a soft ride, probably similar to OEM shocks but with a bit more stiffness.

Very good description. They are built heavy duty. Not that expensive either. Any guess on how long the Xreas shocks will hold up? I bet they will be expensive to replace :( I'm hoping they will last 90K miles.
 
Pitbull said:
Very good description. They are built heavy duty. Not that expensive either. Any guess on how long the Xreas shocks will hold up? I bet they will be expensive to replace :( I'm hoping they will last 90K miles.

If the XREAS (monotube) shocks are well-made (i assume they are), then they should last a long time. Monotube shocks tend to last much longer than twin-tubes. Bilsteins supposedly last a lifetime.
 
I put bilsteins on my 99 runner with a 2.5 inch rev tek lift. Since I've had the lift, my front cv boots have ripped twice. I'm assuming the rips are related to the lift. What I'm confused about is that I seem to be the only one having this problem. I see a lot of 4 runners and tacomas with the same lift but with no damage to the boot. Any help anyone can give would be appreciated!!!
 
Rancho/Pro Comp

Hi, i was looking through the old posts and sa this. I understand about the sacrificing through changing shocks. But I do have one question/comment.. .

Has anyone tried the Ranch RSX 9000 or The Procomp MX-6?

These are both adjustable shocks through selectors on the actual shock. i guess it might be somewhat of a hassle to change the settings (have to reach up into each wheel well, but wouldnt this way you be able to select super soft for hardcore off roading, and very firm for performance street handling and then somewhare in-between for daily driving? I was kind of thinking of getting a set of these, but after reading Thais opinion on aftermarket shocks i am curious wether its worth it... Thanks Joe...

Oh heres the links..

Pro Comp MX-6 - http://www.explorerprocomp.com/shocks_mx6.php

Rancho RS9000X
http://www.gorancho.com/products/shocks/RS9000X.stm

Rancho also offers a remote control system for their shocks to adjust from the cab...

http://www.gorancho.com/products/accessories/RS9000RCX.stm


Also, what im not sure about is what size would i need for the 2005 SR5 4X4? Its not offered but I was kind of under the assumption that size didnt really matter as long as it is close to stock as the shocks will compress or expand to fit? Thansk again
 
Re: Rancho/Pro Comp

independent70 said:
Hi, i was looking through the old posts and sa this. I understand about the sacrificing through changing shocks. But I do have one question/comment.. .

Has anyone tried the Ranch RSX 9000 or The Procomp MX-6?

These are both adjustable shocks through selectors on the actual shock. i guess it might be somewhat of a hassle to change the settings (have to reach up into each wheel well, but wouldnt this way you be able to select super soft for hardcore off roading, and very firm for performance street handling and then somewhare in-between for daily driving? I was kind of thinking of getting a set of these, but after reading Thais opinion on aftermarket shocks i am curious wether its worth it... Thanks Joe...

Oh heres the links..

Pro Comp MX-6 - http://www.explorerprocomp.com/shocks_mx6.php

Rancho RS9000X
http://www.gorancho.com/products/shocks/RS9000X.stm

Rancho also offers a remote control system for their shocks to adjust from the cab...

http://www.gorancho.com/products/accessories/RS9000RCX.stm


Also, what im not sure about is what size would i need for the 2005 SR5 4X4? Its not offered but I was kind of under the assumption that size didnt really matter as long as it is close to stock as the shocks will compress or expand to fit? Thansk again

The Rancho's are an inferior shock to the Bilsteins. Went through this on the TDR site with the big 3/4 and 1 ton Dodge turbo diesel trucks. Everyone that bought the Rancho 9000's finally came around to order the Bilsteins. Don't know anything about the Pro-Comps.
 
If I go with Bils I'm also gonna pony up the money for PP 1" lift springs which makes the Bils easier to live with sine the Bils/OEM spring combo doesn't really mesh together well. I'm also considering the OME setup since they cost the same pretty much but the OME setup does have a slightly better on-road ride.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,307
Messages
3,554,053
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top