Though I can see where some of these arguments are partially relevant to the original question, I hardly think the OP intended to open a politicalcan of worms. Again, I think the question had more to do with semantics than historical prejudice and topics that turned from disagreements into wars.
These days freedom of speech can be boiled down to one person's right to be as stupid as they want & get away with it. I'm sure most people do what they do because they think they are right, but who is ultimately right. I think the guy that flicks a cigarette but on the ground is wrong, but so is the guys that picks it up & hands it to him. It's just an a$$h@le of a different stench. Who do you think died and made you the governor of the EPA? Again, I agree with you fundamentally that they shouldn't litter & personally choose not to, but I'm not so pretentious to believe that everyone should think & act as I do.
I guess the point is live & let live because you can spend your whole life trying to correct things/people that you think are wrong or you can accept that, as Americans, we have the right to be as wrong as we want and there is nothing you can do about it, so stop sticking your nose in everyone else's business & focus on living your own life.
Again, its my right as an American to be as "stupid" as I want, so if you disagree, that's fine, just know trying to change me is much more difficult than learning to acceptour differences